signature campaign BITMIXER - page 2.

bitcoin revo

legendary

Activity: 1168

Merit: 1049

Quote from: yahoo62278 on June 27, 2016, 04:54:07 PM

Quote from: --Encrypted-- on June 27, 2016, 02:36:29 PM

Quote from: yahoo62278 on June 27, 2016, 02:32:40 PM

This right here is a clear example of the level of intelligence on this forum. Lauda is the only person who is on topic period besides the OP.

Bitmixer uses a bot for those of you who care. Its an extremely lazy way to run a campaign and doesn't control spam at all. Just does a character count basically. Someone should compile a list and send to Marco and if he fails to control the issue then ban hammer heaven

err... I don't think marcotheminer manages bitmixer sig campaign.

I dont keep up with bitmixer since im not managing it but i do recall marco had some part in it. Not the point though. Whomever is managing the campaign can be messaged

IIRC, Bitmixer.io used marcotheminer's signature campaign bot/program in their own automated system. I believe that BitMixer.io themselves operate the campaign, so it may be worth a shot to contact them directly.

yahoo62278

legendary

Activity: 3808

Merit: 4603

Contact @yahoo62278 on telegram for marketing

Quote from: --Encrypted-- on June 27, 2016, 02:36:29 PM

Quote from: yahoo62278 on June 27, 2016, 02:32:40 PM

This right here is a clear example of the level of intelligence on this forum. Lauda is the only person who is on topic period besides the OP.

Bitmixer uses a bot for those of you who care. Its an extremely lazy way to run a campaign and doesn't control spam at all. Just does a character count basically. Someone should compile a list and send to Marco and if he fails to control the issue then ban hammer heaven

err... I don't think marcotheminer manages bitmixer sig campaign.

I dont keep up with bitmixer since im not managing it but i do recall marco had some part in it. Not the point though. Whomever is managing the campaign can be messaged

--Encrypted--

copper member

Activity: 924

Merit: 1007

hee-ho.

Quote from: yahoo62278 on June 27, 2016, 02:32:40 PM

This right here is a clear example of the level of intelligence on this forum. Lauda is the only person who is on topic period besides the OP.

Bitmixer uses a bot for those of you who care. Its an extremely lazy way to run a campaign and doesn't control spam at all. Just does a character count basically. Someone should compile a list and send to Marco and if he fails to control the issue then ban hammer heaven

err... I don't think marcotheminer manages bitmixer sig campaign.

yahoo62278

legendary

Activity: 3808

Merit: 4603

Contact @yahoo62278 on telegram for marketing

This right here is a clear example of the level of intelligence on this forum. Lauda is the only person who is on topic period besides the OP.

Bitmixer uses a bot for those of you who care. Its an extremely lazy way to run a campaign and doesn't control spam at all. Just does a character count basically. Someone should compile a list and send to Marco and if he fails to control the issue then ban hammer heaven

BitcoinRonnie

sr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 250

Quote from: ManyMen on June 27, 2016, 11:34:11 AM

I sent a small list of spammers, user BITMIXER, but received no response

Really only one signature that will give you the time of the day and thats Yobit,only because it is run by a mod of this forum. You are throwing a dart up in the air hoping it sticks contacting any other signature mod.
The other issue is you are using a new account and people view newer accounts usually as sock puppets with agendas and write them off easier than say a established member of sorts.

ManyMen

member

Activity: 110

Merit: 12

I sent a small list of spammers, user BITMIXER, but received no response

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 2965

Terminated.

Quote from: zeaderza on June 27, 2016, 09:07:47 AM

if spammers getting removed then this is a good thing I think..

You need to re-read the post again as you haven't clearly understood it. He's saying that the campaign is not removing spammers, i.e. is indirectly endorsing spam.

Quote from: ManyMen on June 27, 2016, 07:39:06 AM

do not you think that BITMIXER signature campaign, it's time to make a warning since a lot of spammers and the company not removes them?

This is not how the staff currently deals with the spam. Usually it is the members themselves that get punished if they do spam. It is quite unfortunate that there are no consequences for the campaign itself if they let a lot of spammers remain 'enrolled'. It would help if you posted examples of spammers.

BitcoinRonnie

sr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 250

Quote from: ManyMen on June 27, 2016, 07:39:06 AM

do not you think that BITMIXER signature campaign, it's time to make a warning since a lot of spammers and the company not removes them?

You got something against Transgenders?

zeaderza

hero member

Activity: 896

Merit: 502

what is your point man? and what exactly you want to say? if spammers getting removed then this is a good thing I think..
this is not the place for spammers. and what was your account by the way which removed from the campaign?

ManyMen

member

Activity: 110

Merit: 12

do not you think that BITMIXER signature campaign, it's time to make a warning since a lot of spammers and the company not removes them?

Topic: signature campaign BITMIXER - page 2. (Read 1770 times)