Topic: Signature campaign stats: users, bans, posts, deleted posts (Read 1341 times)

Great! Thank you for all what you do for the forum.

Unfortunately I'm up to my neck into some other work but maybe I'll find some time. Will try to refresh this thread as well.

Edit: this thread has been updated and the CryptoTalk list has been updated as well.

Hello suchmoon
Are you planning to generate a new list of Cryptotalk campaign participants soon?
I see the last one was in october. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/cryptotalk-signature-campaign-participants-2019-10-25-5196008

 

ty

Thanks. I'll see if I can replace those with the correct links.

You realize that if suchmoon gives you that list, you're going to repay the favor by ignoring him in the future?  


If you plan any updates you might want to remove
is a short url service.

Pure coincidence is used by a bounty campaign that has just been bumped in the scam accusation

Most of the users of forum including the best users are using at least one of these signatures. If you put all of them in your ignore list, then you will see only the posts made by newbies. So if you want to ignore all of the posts made by these users, I suggest you to ignore the forum and logout now.

Any way, you can use the spreadsheets.

I have added avg and max number of users, as well as posts per day. Removed bitcoin.org and discord.gg sites.

---

That would be a lot of users so probably not. I'm not even sure if your ignore list could handle that.

would it be possible to generate a list of all the users in these campaigns? i would like to put them all on my ignore list.

I, and I'm sure everyone else, appreciates the work you are doing. I realize it's not going to be an instant fix and new spammers are joining all the time. But because of their ridiculous policy of accepting everyone* (which again I realize you have no control over) and then relying on you to ban the spammers, I can't help but feel you will never win. There is a near endless stream of spammer accounts who will want to sign up at some point. If they keep going like this, I would hope theymos would step in as he did before.

*The cynical side of me says they are doing this on purpose. People set their signature, you quickly ban them, they don't realise they are banned, and then YoBit benefit from free signature advertising.

I think everybody knows your situation with the Cryptotalk campaign and that you don't have the power to approve applications. So obviously when a shitposter joins and then you kick them out - by definition all that shit they posted makes the campaign look worse. Don't take this personally


I'm counting all users who ever had that signature over the course of the year. And it also includes those who don't remove signatures even if they're no longer paid by the campaign. I'm thinking of adding "max daily posters" or "average daily posters" or something like that, which would be a better reflection of the size of the campaign.

I skimmed through that thread and saw that most of the posts were being made by cryptotalk.org campaigners.  Some of them weren't exactly shitposts, but I'll take your word on the obviousness of some of the replies.  No doubt they're motivated primarily by their campaign. 

I have the whole altcoin section blocked now, as this seems to be where all the crap posters flock to.  Sometimes I find interesting threads there, but right now I don't feel like sifting through a mountain of manure either looking for a hidden gem to merit or to read something that catches my attention.  That entire section stinks to high hell--it always did, but now it's even worse. 

If that's the case, you ought to learn to lower your expectations.  Bring a shovel and a poopy bag next time you see a thread where the majority of the members are wearing a signature that has anything to do with Yobit or cryptotalk.org.  Lol. 

Anyone remember Secondstrade?  Their participants were just as bad as Yobit's, except I think they put a cap at how many they allowed in their campaign.  It makes a huge difference.  If cryptotalk.org would just accept maybe 50 or even 100 members, the problem might not be so bad.  Or if their manager had any say in the matter as to who gets into the campaign.  The automated process they use is crazy.  No post checking, no merit requirement, no nothing.

I am killing as many spammers as I can each day. Everyone can see that, only problem I have with the numbers is when I ban a user they're still wearing the sig. Even though they're kicked out, their deleted posts and all other stats count against the campaign. Not that the numbers wouldn't still be higher than all the other campaigns(probably 5x more members in the campaign then quite a few of the others, so you have to kinda expect that somewhat right?), but still not exact.

@suchmoon Just to verify a little info for you on the campaigns I manage. I know you posted you have not verified any of the info, just trying to help if this helps.

Windice - 45 currently active users
Bitsler - 16 active users
Bustadice - 16 active users
MintDice - 40 active users
Cryptotalk - 300+

I spoke with the yobit account and they're talking about implementing a merit requirement(no timetable). Agreed I wish i had more control so that users couldn't join and get paid for a few posts before i ban them.

Wow. Those numbers are even worse than I thought they would be. YoBit campaigns 1 and 2 coming in at 162 and 176 respectively, with the next closest campaign being Minter at only 28. As I mentioned earlier in this thread, I've been very aware of all the Minter spam over the last couple of weeks, but to think YoBit is 500% worse is astounding. Cryptotalk at a 176 is even more impressive when you think it has only been active for a few days, since not every spam post is deleted in good time. Seeing these numbers, despite Yahoo obviously trying his hardest to clean up this flood of trash posts, I can't help but feel (and hope) YoBit is heading for another ban.

LOL at the OP's post history, one of those quick language learners.

Sadly not the worst I've seen... I don't want this to become yet another Cryptotalk thread but yeah, we can expect more contrived discussions like that.

@suchmoon, what do you think about this nonsense? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5188843.0;topicseen

I mean......


Its soo borderline and non definitive... but, the obviousness in all of it is sickening.

True. I don't have a way to determine what is an "official" campaign and I stated as much in the OP. I have manually removed some frequent links that are not really campaigns (youtu.be, facebook.com, etc). If I don't forget, during the next update I'll do that with bitcoin.org and discord.gg as well. Binance and Freebitco.in I might just leave as is. If those users with referral links in their signatures are spamming we might want to know.

Yeah, and I'm not saying that their stats are good. I just thought that Yobit/Cryptotalk is the worst campaign. But seems there was even worse campaigns, just with less participants.
Let's hope that Yahoo will clean the house.

But I think Cryptotalk stats is awful.
Suchmoon has listed 100 campaigns and there are only 11 campaigns with a higher percentage of deleted posts than Cryptotalk.

Very interesting stats. Well, Yobit/Cryptotalk campaign stats isn't as bad as I expected. There was even worse campaigns. But notice mainly Yobit spammers, it's because this campaign have highest number of participants and it means highest number of spammers. It would be interesting to see some merits stats included to this table for comparison.
But not everything is 100% accurate here. Some websites are listed here without having signature campaign, for example Bitcoin.org - some users simply wear signatures with a link to Bitcoin.org. And there is websites which never had campaign here, like Binance or Freebitco.in - members simply promote their affiliate links in signature.

I have updated the lists through September 30 so this now includes our new favorite campaign.

I have also made a couple of other changes:


I have adjusted PPD to count only "active" days and users who posted on those days (as per the definition in the OP). So this is going to be even higher for Chipmixer. It may discard some low-activity days but I think it better reflects the overall activity.


Done - see "Del/Day".

---

And last but not least - I have to say I'm very impressed by the number of deleted posts in the CryptoTalk campaign. I don't have time to report that crap but my hat's off to whoever is doing it, and please don't forget to report serial offenders to yahoo62278.

I'm counting the ban against the last known signature within 7 days before the ban. There might be some inaccuracies but it goes both ways - some bans may get uncounted, some may get double-counted - e.g. if someone within 7 days switched campaigns twice AND got banned. This should be very rare though.


Thank you

Just a question-
Imagine, an user has participated in Chipmixer campaign, later he switched to yobit (Noone will do in reality  ), and got banned. Which one you are counting? Current signature?
If you are counting current signature, what if they have removed the signature?

It's now 4000, I have shared it on behalf of you 
Most problems are with altcoin campaign, where 99% campaign manager never think to check the post quality, they only thinks about the post counts.

Oh, lovely thread. Pity I'm out of smerit to give you your 4000th one..
There you open some new work for me to browse and see how many spammers I can report in each campaign and to get in contact with the managers.


Thank you

First offence - typcally a tempban, and it takes a lot of spamming to get that. Some extreme serial offenders could eventually get a permaban but that'd be very rare.


Pretty much.


Sadly no. modlog contains only permanent bans (and not all of them). However as a comparative metric it's still quite good I think. A campaign that had 10% of its participants permabanned is very likely not managed as well as a campaign that had 1 or 2%.

Yeah, now this is what I was talking about!


Is this any good? What is the ban for spamming?
Aren't straight permabans mostly for only plagiarism, ban evasion, and malicious links?
Could you easily redo it to count all bans?


I'd say ban the bounty/campaign manager a couple times before you go banning the signature URL..
If they have to replace the BM a couple times then maybe ban the URL, or if managed offsite then just ban the URL..

Then their will be risk to the companies if they agree to low quality with low quality managers, or risk for 1 strike and your out if they choose to manage offsite..
This will create incentive to hire quality managers and to not manage offsite for the companies..

I wanna see the bad BMs/CMs accounts get WREKT and push the companies to hire managers that do a good job and will only agree to do a good job.. So this would be good for the economy of the quality managers..

Ahh, I misunderstood your tone. Such are the perils of communicating via a forum.

I agree with your statement that pretty much all altcoin bounty managers are not doing the job they are supposed to be doing and are accepting any old trash to their campaigns, and as you say, number of posts deleted is not an absolute measure of quality. It is a useful indicator, though, and it is no surprise that in general the altcoin paying campaigns have many, many more posts deleted than the bitcoin paying campaigns. There are obvious a couple of exception to this, most notable the recently reactivated Yobit spam.

I was talking about signature campaigns that pay participants with altcoins.

You are completely right.
Unfortunately, managers of altcoins signature campaigns accept any user applies. Just check some of their spreadsheets. I just wanted to say that even if a campaign has lower number of deleted posts, it doesn't mean that its manager is doing his job properly. The lower number of deleted posts is only due to his luck. Because he has accepted all the applications.
We cannot compare the quality of mangers work based on deleted posts. Because all of them are doing a same thing. They accept every one.
If campaign "A" has less deleted posts than "B", it doesn't mean that the manager of campaign "A" is better than manager of campaign "B". Because both managers have accepted every one. Manager "A" is only more lucky than manager "B".

Check the spreadsheets. Only some users with red trust are not accepted. It is same in almost all of altcoins signature campaigns.

If you are talking about bounties in relation to Facebook, Twitter, Medium, etc., promotion, then this is irrelevant to these data, since they are "based on URLs found in user signatures".

If you are talking about bounties in relation to signature campaigns which pay in a(n) token/altcoin, as opposed to signature campaigns which pay in bitcoin, then you are correct to say that bitcoin paying campaigns generally have much higher quality posts than token/altcoin paying campaigns. This, however, does not mean bounty managers have free reign to let their participants spam low quality trash across the forum. In fact, the vast majority of spam comes from campaigns which do not pay in bitcoin; since they can create their payment token out of nothing, it costs them nothing to "pay" for this advertising and so they don't have to be picky and look for high quality posters. Instead, the go for quantity over quality and recruit hundreds of spammers.

If any of these campaigns is having excessive numbers of their posts deleted for spamming, then that bounty manager should either do their job properly, or the campaign should be banned.

There is a big difference between bounties and bitcoin signature campaigns.
- In bounties, the acceptance of your application does not depend on your post history, merit, spamming, etc.
- In bitcoin signature campaigns, your post history is always reviewed by managers.

So, if the number of deleted posts of participants of campaign "A" is higher than "B", we cannot say the bounty manager of "A" is worse than "B". Almost all bounty managers accept any user unless the user has red trust.

In bitcoin signature campaigns, the quality of posts of participants depends on manager. The manager remove any one spamming and try to accept high quality posters. In these campaigns the quality of posts depends on the rates too. It's normal that the quality of posts made by Chipmixer's participants is higher than posts made by Bitvest participants.

Any chance of a "posts deleted divided by number of active days" column? I feel that might be a useful metric for both comparing campaigns and finding the worst offenders.

I've certainly noticed (and have been reporting) a flood of "Minter" spam over the last week. This makes more sense now that I see they have recruited 300 users. Their total number of deleted posts doesn't look that high, but when looking at posts deleted per day, they are currently coming in at 23.5, which is the highest of the top 10 recently active campaigns in your second post. I'd be interested to see how it compares against all campaigns.

I appreciate the limitation in what I'm asking for as it does not take in to account total number of posts made in the campaign.

Sure, that's why there is a list of current campaigns in the second post for a more apples-to-apples comparison but even that is not quite fair. Recently started campaigns haven't had a chance to get as many bans or deleted posts as the older ones, although they are trying for sure... see minter: 14 days, 4 bans.

Historic data can be quite interesting for other reasons, particularly since the totally-not-a-yobit campaign is making a comeback. I'm almost tempted to start taking bets on that one - will it be able to exceed the crappiness of the previous one before getting blacklisted.

Excuse me suchmoon, but anyone who wants to jump to conclusions, must be sure he read the number of days for which the campaign have been running during the last year and if the campaign is still active or not.

Impressed by ChipMixer stats! (DS is doing a great job,)

He was temp-banned and sig-banned and got it overturned. No permaban.


cellard was first permabanned, then the ban was revised to temp+sig. That's why he counts and bill gator doesn't. It's just how modlog works.


I have max users per day as well as user count for each day. It's just too complicated to glue it all together as evidenced by the issues above.

---

I have updated the list. The number of users should now be closer to "who posted at least once within the 1 year period" as stated in the OP. Some no longer active campaigns have dropped off the list.

Next I'll try to make the PPD more relevant.

I tried to make analyse signatures way back, but found that it was rather much a cul-de-sac to interpret (or at least it was for me).

The exercise is very interesting, although I do find the PPD rather low in general. For example Chipmixer has a PPD of 2.4, but going over the last two weeks of the spread sheet it is more in the 4.4 to 4.6 area (some random lower week tolled 3.87). It may be related to dividing by the 110 distinct participants over a 365 day period. If we do it by a rough 60 concurrent participants, we get a 4.4 PPD, which is in line with the spreadsheet. Ofcourse we know the number of cuncurrent users in Chipmixer, but not off-hand for all the other campaigns.

I am pretty sure he was. Because of plagiarism.

Later it turned out that it was not he who did the plagiarisms but the person he bought the account from.


Edit:
Alright.. he got banned for plagiarism, but it was just a temp ban instead of a perm ban. 
Sorry for the inconvenience.

cellard is the one banned user. bill gator was never permabanned and I count only permabans.


I don't either. There is only 1 actually posting user and a bunch of inactive ones wearing the signature for whatever reason. I'll fix this.


The number will likely be higher than the current number of participants since I'm counting anyone who ever posted with that signature. Might even catch some applicants who didn't get accepted. I'm not too worried about that, it's the big discrepancies that I'll try to eliminate.

I think there are a lot of stragglers or some formula you are using is borked.
Mintdice only has ~40 people in it.
windice is ~50

might want to check how you pulled the numbers. A few others I glanced at were also off by a large number.

ETA Or what the last 3 posts above said....

-Dave

Cellard? Although it was also a temp ban!

Who is that one banned person ?

Do you only count actual lasting bans or generally all bans happened ?
What i mean is.. is the one person banned bill gator whose ban got changed to a sig ban ? Or is there someone else i am not aware of ?


Edit: IIRC his ban got lifted completely, not turned into a sig ban.

I think I still have some issues with stragglers. Stand by, the number of users in some of those campaigns will likely go down and the list will be reordered.

It's no surprise which campaign has the lowest percentage of deleted posts

I don't even recognize most of the campaigns with a high percentage of deleted posts. I guess because most of the spam happened on the Altcoin boards.

How active is for instance deeponion's signature? Could it be abandoned, but many inactive accounts still wear the signature and a few of them made some posts in the last year? I haven't seen much of it anymore, while it was the worst spam-campaign at some point during it's peak.

Reserved.

Recently active signatures:

                                                        ---- Users ----              ------ Posts ------  ----- Deleted ---- 
   #  Site                            Days    Last Day  Avg  Max  Total  Bans  Ban%  Total  P/Day  P/U/D  Total  Del%  D/Day 
   1. cryptotalk.org                    35      active  362  438    907    10   1.1  93138   2659    7.2   4727   5.1    135 
   2. bitvest.io                       362      active   29   53    226    16   7.1  67494    186    6.3   2900   4.3      8 
   3. xcard.io                          67      active   63  107    214     0   0.0  11863    177    2.8    781   6.6     12 
   4. windice.io                       234      active   40   63    206    14   6.8  38664    165    4.1   2395   6.2     10 
   5. deeponion.org                    364      active    9   21    154     7   4.5   6264     17    1.8    174   2.8      0 
   6. is.gd                            264  2019-10-28    7   33    148     6   4.1   5945     22    2.9    720  12.1      3 
   7. 777coin.com                      362      active   21   38    131     3   2.3  50364    139    6.4   2675   5.3      7 
   8. hivenet.cloud                     49  2019-10-30   29   56    119     0   0.0   4379     89    2.8     82   1.9      2 
   9. semux.org                        333  2019-10-29    4   16    114    19  16.7   2520      8    1.8    247   9.8      1 
  10. wolf.bet                          94      active   18   42    105     1   1.0  11373    120    6.2    100   0.9      1 
  11. icacoin.com                       86      active   16   40    102     1   1.0   4383     51    2.9    239   5.5      3 
  12. chipmixer.com                    365      active   45   60    100     1   1.0  97788    268    5.9    342   0.3      1 
  13. gold.storage                     101      active   15   23     90     0   0.0   5029     50    3.2     73   1.5      1 
  14. tokpie.io                        192  2019-10-30    6   28     87     6   6.9   4523     23    2.6    114   2.5      1 
  15. hawk.cool                         73      active   19   28     85     0   0.0   3693     51    2.6    349   9.5      5 
  16. mintdice.com                      75      active   24   43     76     0   0.0   9560    127    4.3    287   3.0      4 
  17. usdq.platinum.fund               156      active    8   17     74     1   1.4   2560     16    2.0     82   3.2      1 
  18. billcrypt.io                     117  2019-10-30   14   31     68     3   4.4   4895     41    2.7    825  16.9      7 
  19. pointpay.io                      139  2019-10-30    8   19     67     1   1.5   2874     21    2.6    189   6.6      1 
  20. ico.diagon.io                     10      active   23   32     65     1   1.5    718     72    2.9      3   0.4      0 
  21. tlsgroup.io                       29  2019-10-27   10   24     65     0   0.0    651     22    2.0     10   1.5      0 
  22. privcy.io                        222  2019-10-26    2    7     60     6  10.0    686      3    1.8     75  10.9      0 
  23. orionix.io                       118      active   14   24     59     1   1.7   4906     42    2.9    375   7.6      3 
  24. freebitco.in                     346      active    3   10     58     5   8.6   1894      5    1.9     29   1.5      0 
  25. e3t.co                            11      active   16   38     57     0   0.0    379     34    2.0      9   2.4      1 
  26. bustadice.com                    365      active   15   18     56     2   3.6  24080     66    4.4    790   3.3      2 
  27. drife.one                        209  2019-10-28    6   20     46     4   8.7   3394     16    2.6    128   3.8      1 
  28. match365.com                      18      active   16   25     45     0   0.0   1342     74    4.2     10   0.7      1 
  29. agareum.com                       10      active   19   26     44     0   0.0    572     57    2.8     12   2.1      1 
  30. quarkchain.io                     79  2019-10-26    5   18     44     1   2.3   1003     13    2.6     64   6.4      1 
  31. cryptomaniaslots.com              27  2019-10-29   13   19     43     0   0.0   1531     57    4.3     56   3.7      2 
  32. bitc2.org                        293      active    3   20     42     4   9.5   2326      8    2.4     46   2.0      0 
  33. swapzilla.co                      26      active   15   25     42     1   2.4   1266     49    3.0     12   0.9      0 
  34. yolodice.com                     365      active   11   17     42     1   2.4  20959     57    5.3    474   2.3      1 
  35. bitsler.com                      267      active   11   20     41     1   2.4  15708     59    5.2    345   2.2      1 
  36. localcoin.is                     150      active    6   18     40     1   2.5   2488     17    2.8     48   1.9      0 
  37. pngme.com                         52      active   13   24     38     0   0.0   1953     38    2.9     35   1.8      1 
  38. easyfeedbacktoken.io              96      active    5   13     37     2   5.4    940     10    1.9      4   0.4      0 
  39. achpay.org                        29      active    9   18     35     0   0.0    710     24    2.5      1   0.1      0 
  40. bitcoin.org                      313      active    3   10     31     0   0.0   2543      8    3.1     29   1.1      0 
  41. ieo.guider.travel                116  2019-10-25    7   17     29     0   0.0   2723     23    3.2    256   9.4      2 
  42. omnity.io                        269  2019-10-28    3   12     29     2   6.9   2698     10    3.7     21   0.8      0 
  43. swcpoker.eu                      240  2019-10-27    2    9     27     2   7.4    973      4    2.1      7   0.7      0 
  44. onehash.com                      305  2019-10-30    3   17     27     0   0.0   6002     20    6.1     37   0.6      0 
  45. cannacor.io                       15      active    7   14     26     0   0.0    237     16    2.2      0   0.0      0 
  46. ixinium.io                       109      active    6   11     26     0   0.0   1553     14    2.4    144   9.3      1 
  47. vite.org                          87      active    3   10     26     0   0.0    473      5    2.0     22   4.7      0 
  48. flipnpik.io                      322  2019-10-30    4   14     25     2   8.0   4658     14    4.1     47   1.0      0 
  49. https:                           168  2019-10-25    3   10     25     2   8.0   1516      9    2.8     22   1.5      0 
  50. snbtoken.io                       83      active    4   10     25     0   0.0   1259     15    3.4     81   6.4      1 
  51. trueflip.io                      262      active    2    9     25     0   0.0    875      3    2.0     26   3.0      0 
  52. playbetr.com                     159      active    8   12     25     3  12.0   6627     42    5.0    397   6.0      2 
  53. blender.io                        13      active    4   19     24     0   0.0    148     11    2.9      1   0.7      0 
  54. genesisnetwork.io                259  2019-10-29    2   13     24     1   4.2    871      3    1.5     20   2.3      0 
  55. lollypoptoken.com                 28      active    6   10     24     0   0.0    765     27    4.8      3   0.4      0 
  56. wavesplatform.com                192  2019-10-25    2    6     24     1   4.2    540      3    1.8     17   3.1      0 
  57. p2psf.org                        146      active    3   13     24     1   4.2   1198      8    3.0     13   1.1      0 
  58. bethash.io                       199      active    4   14     23     0   0.0   2445     12    3.0     39   1.6      0 
  59. fortunejack.com                  360      active   11   18     23     1   4.3  20600     57    5.1    132   0.6      0 
  60. discord.gg                       312      active    2    5     22     0   0.0   1210      4    2.0    141  11.7      0 
  61. freelanex.io                      41      active    5   12     22     1   4.5    592     14    2.6     46   7.8      1 
  62. crypto-games.net                 365      active    6   12     21     1   4.8  10006     27    4.3    169   1.7      0 
  63. bitenny.io                       128  2019-10-26    3   10     20     0   0.0    944      7    2.2     12   1.3      0 
  64. smartmixer.io                      2      active   12   15     20     0   0.0    138     69    3.8     14  10.1      7 
  65. elad.network                     124      active    3    6     20     1   5.0   1077      9    3.0    210  19.5      2 
  66. adsana.io                         72      active    4    8     19     1   5.3    866     12    3.2    189  21.8      3 
  67. tycoon.io                        106      active    3    6     17     1   5.9    956      9    3.1     95   9.9      1 
  68. refinemedium.com                 172      active    3    7     16     2  12.5   1685     10    3.4    135   8.0      1 
  69. token-sale.fredenergy.org         51  2019-10-30    3    7     16     1   6.3    433      8    2.4      2   0.5      0 
  70. byteball.org                     125  2019-10-28    1    4     15     5  33.3    191      2    1.2      4   2.1      0 
  71. erosiontoken.surge.sh             59  2019-10-29    3    9     15     0   0.0    445      8    2.3     21   4.7      0 
  72. trueplay.io                      228      active    1    4     15     0   0.0    502      2    1.6      4   0.8      0 
  73. gigajoule.io                      37      active    4    7     14     0   0.0    438     12    2.8      9   2.1      0 
  74. sportsbet.io                     169      active    4   10     14     0   0.0   3188     19    5.0     27   0.8      0 
  75. thalertoken.com                   21  2019-10-25    3   10     14     0   0.0    174      8    2.3      1   0.6      0 
  76. novatoken.io                      49      active    2    6     13     0   0.0    125      3    1.7      6   4.8      0 
  77. vipgame.io                        20      active    7   10     13     0   0.0    526     26    3.5      2   0.4      0 
  78. bitdice.me                       365      active    8   11     13     0   0.0  13878     38    4.9    164   1.2      0 
  79. bitcasino.io                     362      active    3    5     12     0   0.0   8907     25    8.1     63   0.7      0 
  80. hodium.com                        15      active    4   11     12     0   0.0    265     18    3.8      0   0.0      0 
  81. quube.exchange                    44      active    3    7     12     0   0.0    372      8    2.8      2   0.5      0 
  82. citios.io                         59      active    2    4     12     0   0.0    447      8    3.9      2   0.4      0 
  83. vectorium.co                      91      active    2    7     12     0   0.0    585      6    2.8     64  10.9      1 
  84. 2local.io                         52  2019-10-30    3    6     11     0   0.0    346      7    2.5      5   1.4      0 
  85. heliosprotocol.io                148      active    1    3     11     0   0.0    269      2    1.4      4   1.5      0 
  86. luckygames.io                    168  2019-10-30    1    4     11     0   0.0    453      3    2.0     23   5.1      0 
  87. nitrogensports.eu                353      active    1    4     11     0   0.0    909      3    1.9      2   0.2      0 
  88. amazix.com                       226  2019-10-28    2    5     11     2  18.2    998      4    2.8     16   1.6      0 
  89. bitmex.com                       279      active    2    5     11     0   0.0   2219      8    4.1     13   0.6      0 
  90. bit.diamonds                     144  2019-10-26    1    4     10     0   0.0    281      2    1.4      7   2.5      0 
  91. tokensale.thebamboo.io            79      active    2    6     10     1  10.0    576      7    3.0      5   0.9      0 
  92. elitemininginc.com               184  2019-10-30    2    4      9     0   0.0    909      5    3.3     30   3.3      0 
  93. emjac.io                          24  2019-10-27    2    7      9     0   0.0    103      4    1.9      2   1.9      0 
  94. exmarkets.com                    103      active    2    3      9     1  11.1    520      5    2.8      3   0.6      0 
  95. lisk.io                          117      active    1    2      9     0   0.0    217      2    1.7     13   6.0      0 
  96. stratisplatform.com              178  2019-10-26    1    3      9     1  11.1    500      3    2.3      0   0.0      0 
  97. savedroid.com                    300      active    1    4      9     0   0.0    867      3    2.2     14   1.6      0 
  98. betking.io                        69  2019-10-29    1    3      8     1  12.5    238      3    3.1     10   4.2      0 
  99. ico.rasputinmansion.com           22  2019-10-27    1    4      8     0   0.0    179      8    5.8     14   7.8      1 
 100. karbo.io                         132      active    1    3      8     0   0.0    227      2    1.4      1   0.4      0 

This data is based on URLs found in user signatures. Multiple users wearing a link to a specific site are likely getting paid for it (e.g. via a signature campaign)  but I have not verified this against any spreadsheets or other "official" campaign information. For the purposes of this post a "campaign" is a "group of users having a link to the same site in their signatures". It's possible that e.g. some users wearing ref links to a certain site will end up included in this list while not being part of an organized signature campaign.
Top 100 signatures by number of users. This covers a period of 1 year between November 1, 2018 - October 31, 2019.

                                                        ---- Users ----              ------ Posts ------  ----- Deleted ---- 
   #  Site                            Days    Last Day  Avg  Max  Total  Bans  Ban%  Total  P/Day  P/U/D  Total  Del%  D/Day 
   1. cryptotalk.org                    35      active  362  438    907    10   1.1  93138   2659    7.2   4727   5.1    135 
   2. yobit.net                          5  2019-07-01    7  306    448     8   1.8  14099   1204    8.5    797   5.7    159 
   3. miracletele.com                   76  2019-06-02   30  234    399    34   8.5  21202    267    2.8    452   2.1      6 
   4. minter.network                    39  2019-10-10   67  246    397     6   1.5  20043    506    3.2    942   4.7     24 
   5. stake.com                        174  2019-07-12   23  104    282    20   7.1  77806    441    9.8   1367   1.8      8 
   6. catex.io                          93  2019-05-02   29   94    233     4   1.7  13521    142    2.6    270   2.0      3 
   7. ironx.io                          77  2019-01-25   34  112    230    10   4.3  13402    171    2.8    334   2.5      4 
   8. bcnex.net                        115  2019-07-17   22  113    227    14   6.2  15522    129    3.0    274   1.8      2 
   9. bitvest.io                       362      active   29   53    226    16   7.1  67494    186    6.3   2900   4.3      8 
  10. temtum.com                        89  2019-08-21   29   98    214     6   2.8   9712    108    2.8   1012  10.4     11 
  11. xcard.io                          67      active   63  107    214     0   0.0  11863    177    2.8    781   6.6     12 
  12. bitwings.org                      73  2019-10-01   32   98    212    10   4.7   8014    108    2.5   1453  18.1     20 
  13. bitbondsto.com                    64  2019-07-12   41  124    211     9   4.3  16711    256    3.5    316   1.9      5 
  14. tokensale.moozicore.com          178  2019-06-07   28   75    207     8   3.9  22436    125    3.5    503   2.2      3 
  15. windice.io                       234      active   40   63    206    14   6.8  38664    165    4.1   2395   6.2     10 
  16. eosex.com                         60  2018-12-30   19   97    200    18   9.0  11458    178    3.0    249   2.2      4 
  17. curioinvest.com                   32  2019-09-19   46  115    181     0   0.0   6412    198    2.7    719  11.2     22 
  18. wppenergy.io                      62  2019-01-04   21   95    170    14   8.2   9103    143    2.8    204   2.2      3 
  19. eterbase.com                     100  2019-08-11   20   54    167     7   4.2  11456    113    3.5    431   3.8      4 
  20. cryptomarketads.com               63  2019-07-11   14   90    167     2   1.2   7493    103    3.0    217   2.9      3 
  21. mycrojobs.io                     283  2019-09-06   13   54    164     9   5.5  13395     47    3.3   1898  14.2      7 
  22. veil-project.com                  91  2019-07-01   26   71    158     8   5.1  13052    142    3.5    198   1.5      2 
  23. deeponion.org                    364      active    9   21    154     7   4.5   6264     17    1.8    174   2.8      0 
  24. ferrum.network                   105  2019-08-09   29   77    153    13   8.5  12027    114    3.0    785   6.5      7 
  25. 1smart.fund                       31  2019-09-24   12   80    148     1   0.7   3624    113    3.7    217   6.0      7 
  26. is.gd                            264  2019-10-28    7   33    148     6   4.1   5945     22    2.9    720  12.1      3 
  27. harmony.one                       53  2019-06-09   15   86    147     8   5.4   6313    114    2.8     49   0.8      1 
  28. vitex.net                         33  2019-09-12   17   71    139     0   0.0   2697     80    2.6    454  16.8     14 
  29. 777coin.com                      362      active   21   38    131     3   2.3  50364    139    6.4   2675   5.3      7 
  30. arround.io                        18  2018-11-18   26   90    131     4   3.1   2998    162    2.9    126   4.2      7 
  31. aigopay.tech                      72  2019-09-04   25   51    130     6   4.6   5709     79    2.7   1198  21.0     17 
  32. iovo.io                           76  2019-05-30   15   57    123     7   5.7   8163    106    3.6     91   1.1      1 
  33. w12.io                            53  2018-12-24   11   67    123     7   5.7   6157    111    3.0    285   4.6      5 
  34. hivenet.cloud                     49  2019-10-30   29   56    119     0   0.0   4379     89    2.8     82   1.9      2 
  35. semux.org                        333  2019-10-29    4   16    114    19  16.7   2520      8    1.8    247   9.8      1 
  36. athero.io                         94  2019-02-05   15   52    112     2   1.8   6228     65    2.8    101   1.6      1 
  37. storichain.io                     45  2019-08-20   15   64    109     0   0.0   3474     75    3.0    244   7.0      5 
  38. wolf.bet                          94      active   18   42    105     1   1.0  11373    120    6.2    100   0.9      1 
  39. deex.exchange                     93  2019-02-07   26   70    104     4   3.8   9180     98    2.8     87   0.9      1 
  40. hydrax.io                         59  2019-07-17   18   60    104     1   1.0   4523     76    3.7     30   0.7      1 
  41. iconiqlab.com                     40  2018-12-14   22   74    103    11  10.7   4632    114    3.7     87   1.9      2 
  42. icacoin.com                       86      active   16   40    102     1   1.0   4383     51    2.9    239   5.5      3 
  43. haratoken.io                      96  2019-04-12   36   78    101     4   4.0  13669    142    3.1    414   3.0      4 
  44. chipmixer.com                    365      active   45   60    100     1   1.0  97788    268    5.9    342   0.3      1 
  45. alprockz.io                      112  2019-04-01   19   41     99     1   1.0   7742     69    2.8    204   2.6      2 
  46. nupaymentalliance.com            122  2019-10-07    9   40     99     5   5.1   5305     41    3.1     40   0.8      0 
  47. stabledex.io                      52  2019-10-05   11   43     98     1   1.0   2574     48    2.6    509  19.8     10 
  48. xcrypt.club                       49  2019-06-23    7   51     96     8   8.3   4584     87    2.9     45   1.0      1 
  49. auditchain.com                   100  2019-09-23   16   44     95     3   3.2   5991     58    2.8   1320  22.0     13 
  50. dbc.io                            18  2018-11-29    7   63     95     1   1.1   1203     58    3.0     34   2.8      2 
  51. azbit.com                        189  2019-07-01    7   28     93     8   8.6   4693     24    2.9     88   1.9      0 
  52. adabsolutions.com                164  2019-05-15   17   39     92     3   3.3   8525     52    2.8    181   2.1      1 
  53. gigzi.com                         94  2019-02-10   15   41     90     5   5.6   6966     72    3.1     96   1.4      1 
  54. gold.storage                     101      active   15   23     90     0   0.0   5029     50    3.2     73   1.5      1 
  55. tokpie.io                        192  2019-10-30    6   28     87     6   6.9   4523     23    2.6    114   2.5      1 
  56. dabanking.io                      45  2019-07-21   11   50     86     6   7.0   3187     69    3.0     48   1.5      1 
  57. bvo.trybravo.com                  30  2018-11-30   14   41     85     4   4.7   2121     70    3.4     76   3.6      3 
  58. hawk.cool                         73      active   19   28     85     0   0.0   3693     51    2.6    349   9.5      5 
  59. iotex.io                          63  2019-05-20   14   44     84     6   7.1   4958     77    2.9     48   1.0      1 
  60. arawtoken.io                      61  2019-01-21    7   49     83     6   7.2   4459     65    4.9     97   2.2      2 
  61. platio.io                         47  2018-12-21   14   46     83     4   4.8   3330     69    2.9     53   1.6      1 
  62. populous.world                   100  2019-10-15    4   38     83     1   1.2   2135     18    2.2     36   1.7      0 
  63. gigtricks.io                     170  2019-09-02    6   33     82     9  11.0   4532     25    3.1    371   8.2      2 
  64. orbistransfer.com                220  2019-07-30    7   27     82     2   2.4   5655     25    2.7     65   1.1      0 
  65. bestmixer.io                      56  2019-05-23   40   61     81     9  11.1  15618    278    6.0     98   0.6      2 
  66. bidooh.io                         63  2019-01-03   19   47     80     5   6.3   5991     94    3.7    515   8.6      8 
  67. invech.io                         85  2019-09-23    9   34     79     4   5.1   2479     29    2.4    177   7.1      2 
  68. colletrix.com                     88  2019-09-05   10   32     79     2   2.5   3098     35    2.7    158   5.1      2 
  69. mintdice.com                      75      active   24   43     76     0   0.0   9560    127    4.3    287   3.0      4 
  70. tokensale.cryptonity.io           83  2019-06-02    4   34     76     3   3.9   2185     23    2.7     51   2.3      1 
  71. ooobtc.com                        66  2019-06-22   17   42     76     4   5.3   4340     65    2.7     31   0.7      0 
  72. lbx.com                           45  2018-12-30   16   45     74     2   2.7   3445     75    3.2     62   1.8      1 
  73. usdq.platinum.fund               156      active    8   17     74     1   1.4   2560     16    2.0     82   3.2      1 
  74. playloteo.com                     89  2019-09-05   10   41     74     2   2.7   4315     47    3.2   1260  29.2     14 
  75. daxico.com                        48  2019-03-12   14   32     73     3   4.1   2267     47    2.7    109   4.8      2 
  76. bluenote.world                    67  2019-02-20   13   44     72     1   1.4   3813     55    3.4    115   3.0      2 
  77. ammut.network                     77  2019-06-18   13   38     71     4   5.6   3681     47    2.9     25   0.7      0 
  78. temco.io                          59  2019-03-28    6   33     70     5   7.1   2938     48    3.5     57   1.9      1 
  79. gemera.io                         49  2019-01-14    8   34     70     0   0.0   2348     45    3.6     81   3.4      2 
  80. agatechain.org                   165  2019-05-08    8   43     69     4   5.8   7536     44    3.9     59   0.8      0 
  81. billcrypt.io                     117  2019-10-30   14   31     68     3   4.4   4895     41    2.7    825  16.9      7 
  82. hubrisone.com                     71  2019-04-20    7   25     68     0   0.0   2206     30    2.8     83   3.8      1 
  83. pointpay.io                      139  2019-10-30    8   19     67     1   1.5   2874     21    2.6    189   6.6      1 
  84. republia.io                      188  2019-09-04    5   26     67     9  13.4   4172     21    2.8     56   1.3      0 
  85. rocketpot.io                      25  2019-09-30   10   25     66     0   0.0   1479     58    3.7     63   4.3      3 
  86. ico.diagon.io                     10      active   23   32     65     1   1.5    718     72    2.9      3   0.4      0 
  87. mycryptobank.io                   32  2018-12-14    8   44     65     2   3.1   2267     67    3.7     83   3.7      3 
  88. tlsgroup.io                       29  2019-10-27   10   24     65     0   0.0    651     22    2.0     10   1.5      0 
  89. livecoin.net                     163  2019-09-21   11   35     65     2   3.1  15358     93    6.8    166   1.1      1 
  90. dominium.me                       32  2018-12-04   12   37     64     2   3.1   1698     53    3.5     48   2.8      2 
  91. imusify.com                      194  2019-08-18    7   26     63     5   7.9   4754     24    2.5    235   4.9      1 
  92. terawattled.com                  114  2019-03-08   12   28     63     2   3.2   3711     32    2.5     64   1.7      1 
  93. iskra-coin.io                     77  2019-09-04   10   29     62     1   1.6   2945     38    2.6    380  12.9      5 
  94. icovo.co                          37  2019-01-27    3   38     61     2   3.3    780     19    2.5     33   4.2      1 
  95. yamzu.io                          39  2018-12-09    9   37     61     1   1.6   2247     55    3.0     30   1.3      1 
  96. codex.one                         56  2019-04-12   17   36     60     3   5.0   4251     76    3.6     86   2.0      2 
  97. privcy.io                        222  2019-10-26    2    7     60     6  10.0    686      3    1.8     75  10.9      0 
  98. sonata.ai                        108  2019-04-12    6   26     60     1   1.7   2526     22    2.2     20   0.8      0 
  99. library.files.fm                 195  2019-08-26    6   20     59     4   6.8   3479     18    2.8     43   1.2      0 
 100. orionix.io                       118      active   14   24     59     1   1.7   4906     42    2.9    375   7.6      3 

• Site - extracted from URLs (links) in user signatures.
• Days - number of days the campaign was active within the 1 year period. Active day is counted when 5% or more of total campaign users make posts. This excludes some stragglers who fail to remove signatures after the campaign has ended. Please note that there is no accurate information when users start or stop wearing certain signatures so this is based on scraped user profiles and archive sites.
• Last Day - last day of this campaign; "active" means the campaign was still active on September 30, 2019 (last day of the evaluated timeframe).
• Users - Avg - average number of posting campaign participants per day.
• Users - Max - largest number of posting campaign participants in a single day.
• Users - Total - number of campaign participants who posted at least once within the 1 year period.
• Bans - number of campaign participants who got permanently banned within the 1 year period. Likely underestimated because signatures get removed after permanent bans and the scraper may have not been able to determine whether the ban occurred while the user still had the signature.
• Ban% - percentage of banned users vs total users.
• Posts - Total - number of posts made within the 1 year period by campaign participants.
• Posts - P/Day - average number of posts per active day.
• Posts - P/U/D - average posts per user/day, which is the sum of the number of users who posted on each active day.
• Deleted - Total - number of moderator-deleted posts (from modlog). Please note that this counts posts that have been deleted while the user was wearing the corresponding signature but that doesn't mean the posts were made during that time (could have been older posts). In other words, it's not necessarily a symptom of spam or other issues within a campaign but a more general indication of the quality of participants.
• Deleted - Del% - percentage of deleted posts vs total posts.
• Deleted - D/Day - average number of deleted posts per active day.