After looking at the logs, I find it likely that this story is true ... Therefore, the ban is removed.
I just find it on the whole too unfair to treat him as though he did something when I'm looking at evidence showing that he didn't.
Feels good to be back; thank you theymos.
I wish your principles were consistent even half of the time.
Always convenient, never consistent.
Interesting how that one turned out, right? Unless I'm understanding this incorrectly, iluvbitcoins also bought their account - except they bought it as a legendary, with trust-feedback years after I did. I'm convinced I have that story wrong though, because the actions of certain members are contradictory when comparing my situation and iluvbitcoins - please correct me where I'm wrong.
Thank you for not being one of the weak-spined muppets that dances to the bullets at their feet.
Yet here we are.
No, I made the situation transparent and allowed the proper people to make the call.
Sorry QS, this time around, it really was me explaining my situation. You'll get em next time, though!
Anyone else as excited for me to be back as I am?
You're entitled to your opinion, but from the way you articulated that it sounds like you would be more supportive of my judgement if I silently accepted the punishment for a crime I didn't commit rather than explaining what actually happened and accepting what will come from my true actions.
Statements like this are surprising to hear from someone you considered a friend.
Now that my ban is lifted, it would seem the next objective is to appeal for consistency within the DT network; either tag all of us bought accounts, set a statute of limitations, or at least stop being so obvious when you play favorites.
Appeal successful, locking thread.