Topic: Signature raffle: win 0.5 BTC + Jackpot every week! - page 4. (Read 28748 times)
1CheXo2v9uNK52LQ121GA4bNpxLdvcjmBg
I do not want to accuse anyone, but this is what I'm seeing:
..and..they all have the "Satoshi Karoshi" signature.
Is this strange only for me?
I ask that users to explain their position in this situation
| USER shana dancon leydoh abell cerhut harle | POSTS 12 12 12 13 12 12 | DATE REGISTERED 09 June 2013, 06:23:16 09 June 2013, 10:07:00 09 June 2013, 10:08:23 09 June 2013, 10:09:28 09 June 2013, 10:12:14 09 June 2013, 10:13:42 |
..and..they all have the "Satoshi Karoshi" signature.
Is this strange only for me?
I ask that users to explain their position in this situation
This is foul play - disqualify them.
They've done 10 posts for link signatures, 1 post in this thread, then 1 post in the CoinVictory thread...and they all have spam posts.
Was about to post this, can confirm that they are most likely alt accounts, and using duplicates for a higher chance.
Thank you for this information! We will check this! If they are scammers, we disqualify them!
@nicolazza: Do you get answer from this users!? (I ask that users to explain their position in this situation Smiley)
I am very disappointed that some user play a false game to get more chance to win ... 0 tolerance for this...
Wait, you're not vit1988, are you from Satoshi Karoshi too?
I do not want to accuse anyone, but this is what I'm seeing:
..and..they all have the "Satoshi Karoshi" signature.
Is this strange only for me?
I ask that users to explain their position in this situation
| USER shana dancon leydoh abell cerhut harle | POSTS 12 12 12 13 12 12 | DATE REGISTERED 09 June 2013, 06:23:16 09 June 2013, 10:07:00 09 June 2013, 10:08:23 09 June 2013, 10:09:28 09 June 2013, 10:12:14 09 June 2013, 10:13:42 |
..and..they all have the "Satoshi Karoshi" signature.
Is this strange only for me?
I ask that users to explain their position in this situation
This is foul play - disqualify them.
They've done 10 posts for link signatures, 1 post in this thread, then 1 post in the CoinVictory thread...and they all have spam posts.
Was about to post this, can confirm that they are most likely alt accounts, and using duplicates for a higher chance.
Thank you for this information! We will check this! If they are scammers, we disqualify them!
@nicolazza: Do you get answer from this users!? (I ask that users to explain their position in this situation Smiley)
I am very disappointed that some user play a false game to get more chance to win ... 0 tolerance for this...
1NasXZQzRNgACBWC3UYKwmWJaokmeLiZkT
Again, another spammer.
Could the OP please manually disqualify these alts/spammers?
1NasXZQzRNgACBWC3UYKwmWJaokmeLiZkT
I do not want to accuse anyone, but this is what I'm seeing:
..and..they all have the "Satoshi Karoshi" signature.
Is this strange only for me?
I ask that users to explain their position in this situation
| USER shana dancon leydoh abell cerhut harle | POSTS 12 12 12 13 12 12 | DATE REGISTERED 09 June 2013, 06:23:16 09 June 2013, 10:07:00 09 June 2013, 10:08:23 09 June 2013, 10:09:28 09 June 2013, 10:12:14 09 June 2013, 10:13:42 |
..and..they all have the "Satoshi Karoshi" signature.
Is this strange only for me?
I ask that users to explain their position in this situation
This is foul play - disqualify them.
They've done 10 posts for link signatures, 1 post in this thread, then 1 post in the CoinVictory thread...and they all have spam posts.
Was about to post this, can confirm that they are most likely alt accounts, and using duplicates for a higher chance.
I do not want to accuse anyone, but this is what I'm seeing:
..and..they all have the "Satoshi Karoshi" signature.
Is this strange only for me?
I ask that users to explain their position in this situation
| USER shana dancon leydoh abell cerhut harle | POSTS 12 12 12 13 12 12 | DATE REGISTERED 09 June 2013, 06:23:16 09 June 2013, 10:07:00 09 June 2013, 10:08:23 09 June 2013, 10:09:28 09 June 2013, 10:12:14 09 June 2013, 10:13:42 |
..and..they all have the "Satoshi Karoshi" signature.
Is this strange only for me?
I ask that users to explain their position in this situation
This is foul play - disqualify them.
They've done 10 posts for link signatures, 1 post in this thread, then 1 post in the CoinVictory thread...and they all have spam posts.
1KFpt9zqumnmnKt7M7xid1mjp5L7PicYTx
174CF9YXJVFtKH6AQGnquNPVkdrrusLwjC
1C94dC6rYQbhWxCWR6vQXnBsKAEkecNavF
1Q2MHb4DLc5d6bwbQngza879moVwzYy4BQ
195HD5hP5xKewRDq2Z2YuqboNjdzirDziZ
No, bad. Using modulus will skew the results, allowing some people an unfair advantage. Unless 'n' is a divisor of the maximum possible value for RND, skew is inevitable.
oh right. the advantage would be negligible low but nevertheless making it divisible will do it:
Code:
$winner = floor( hexdec(substr($hash, strlen($hash)-8, 8)) / $n) % $n + 1;
I'm pretty sure that still introduces skew, because it doesn't look like that makes the maximum random value divisible by n.
The correct way to do it is to discard "bad" random values. Something like this:
Code:
do
{
retval = GetRandomNumber() / ( RAND_MAX / ( n + 1 ));
} while( retval > n);
17Di2p77aEoX1WXxLotGXaaDiTWHL4TrVC
No, bad. Using modulus will skew the results, allowing some people an unfair advantage. Unless 'n' is a divisor of the maximum possible value for RND, skew is inevitable.
oh right. the advantage would be negligible low but nevertheless making it divisible will do it:
Code:
$winner = floor( hexdec(substr($hash, strlen($hash)-8, 8)) / $n) % $n + 1;
is it ok?
1C6MoQ4DrKaLFuu4YqXArUwBEqAQD3dA1n
1C6MoQ4DrKaLFuu4YqXArUwBEqAQD3dA1n
1Ds35NU93W1YNnv59FCzJU5rK4uWErivPg
Very good question. I'm working on this right now 
this is my first draft:
- All participants will get a number from 1 to n in relation to their nicknames in alphabetical order (participant list here)
- Random number RND will be the decimal value of the last 8 characters of the first bitcoin block hash on the drawing day
- Winner is the participant with the number (RND modulo n) + 1
this is my first draft:- All participants will get a number from 1 to n in relation to their nicknames in alphabetical order (participant list here)
- Random number RND will be the decimal value of the last 8 characters of the first bitcoin block hash on the drawing day
- Winner is the participant with the number (RND modulo n) + 1
No, bad. Using modulus will skew the results, allowing some people an unfair advantage. Unless 'n' is a divisor of the maximum possible value for RND, skew is inevitable.
Very good question. I'm working on this right now this is my first draft:
- All participants will get a number from 1 to n in relation to their nicknames in alphabetical order (participant list here)
- Random number RND will be the decimal value of the last 8 characters of the first bitcoin block hash on the drawing day
- Winner is the participant with the number (RND modulo n) + 1
this is my first draft:- All participants will get a number from 1 to n in relation to their nicknames in alphabetical order (participant list here)
- Random number RND will be the decimal value of the last 8 characters of the first bitcoin block hash on the drawing day
- Winner is the participant with the number (RND modulo n) + 1
1DigiT3iQEC2Qsra19eXF66eNr5nhLPLKV
Jump to: