Pages:
Author

Topic: Signatures actually effective? - page 2. (Read 1417 times)

legendary
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1015
September 22, 2015, 03:25:40 AM
#16
Are signatures actually effective? I've seen a lot of them and some have been around for many months. Wouldn't it be pointless to continue further after already having advertised for a couple of months?

They're effective for me but I don't own Playtodos.com...

Seriously though, there have been several campaigns that have ended (e.g., Primedice, CryptoVPN, DaDice) and cited a saturated market or too much expense for the benefit of advertising via signature ads.

Don't be worried about the campaign's effectiveness - these business owners know what they're doing. And when it doesn't work they're not going to wast their time paying people to advertise.

Don't forget Rollin.io, they closed their signature campaign last month due to not enough direct business from this Forum.

Keep the post constructive, kids, otherwise these campaigns will just be history...

Rollin.io running fixed signature campaign which is different payment method if we compare DaDice or Bit-X ( pay per post scheme )
Ofcourse it will effective if signature campaign using ppp scheme.

If you say signature doesn't effective, why we still can see PRC,FJ,Victor,etc still buy advertise slot on Auction..
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 1000
September 22, 2015, 03:15:59 AM
#15
of course it is effective as majority of the people in crypto world are known to this forum and share their opinions and problems on this forum.
but it is tottaly senseless to promote anything unrelated to crypto here as well.
without the SIG's this forum has only 50-60 users ,all this crowd is helping this forum and getting good AD revenues to thermos and more funds to forum,if no sig's then no crowd and eventually isolated and non-profit forum,which the admins dont like too.

I get your point, but I'm fairly sure many people already know what bit-x is because of their signature. The only reasonable explanation is that the advertisements are for users who just joined the forum.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1005
Decentralized Asset Management Platform
September 22, 2015, 03:11:49 AM
#14
of course it is effective as majority of the people in crypto world are known to this forum and share their opinions and problems on this forum.
but it is tottaly senseless to promote anything unrelated to crypto here as well.
without the SIG's this forum has only 50-60 users ,all this crowd is helping this forum and getting good AD revenues to thermos and more funds to forum,if no sig's then no crowd and eventually isolated and non-profit forum,which the admins dont like too.
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
September 22, 2015, 03:05:34 AM
#13
Are signatures actually effective? I've seen a lot of them and some have been around for many months. Wouldn't it be pointless to continue further after already having advertised for a couple of months?

They're effective for me but I don't own Playtodos.com...

Seriously though, there have been several campaigns that have ended (e.g., Primedice, CryptoVPN, DaDice) and cited a saturated market or too much expense for the benefit of advertising via signature ads.

Don't be worried about the campaign's effectiveness - these business owners know what they're doing. And when it doesn't work they're not going to wast their time paying people to advertise.

Don't forget Rollin.io, they closed their signature campaign last month due to not enough direct business from this Forum.

Keep the post constructive, kids, otherwise these campaigns will just be history...
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
Loose lips sink sigs!
September 22, 2015, 02:44:05 AM
#12
Are signatures actually effective? I've seen a lot of them and some have been around for many months. Wouldn't it be pointless to continue further after already having advertised for a couple of months?

They're effective for me but I don't own Playtodos.com...

Seriously though, there have been several campaigns that have ended (e.g., Primedice, CryptoVPN, DaDice) and cited a saturated market or too much expense for the benefit of advertising via signature ads.

Don't be worried about the campaign's effectiveness - these business owners know what they're doing. And when it doesn't work they're not going to wast their time paying people to advertise.
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 1000
September 21, 2015, 11:45:34 PM
#11
Well the Bit-x campaign started on Nov 9, 2014 and its probably give out tons of BTC over this (almost) year. Is it really useful in running a signature campaign for that long???
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
September 21, 2015, 11:30:33 PM
#10
...

My understanding of advertising in general (not Signature Campaigns here) is that advertising is expensive and needs to be systematic for quite a while.

If that holds here, brief Campaigns may be disappointing to the advertisers.  The ones who advertise on and on may be the winners.

But, who knows?  Smiley

then why most of the campaigs are brief?
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1863
September 21, 2015, 11:07:47 PM
#9
...

My understanding of advertising in general (not Signature Campaigns here) is that advertising is expensive and needs to be systematic for quite a while.

If that holds here, brief Campaigns may be disappointing to the advertisers.  The ones who advertise on and on may be the winners.

But, who knows?  Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
September 21, 2015, 10:53:55 PM
#8
It is effective but just like in real life it depends on who is wearing them.
If the signature is attached to a user with negative feedback or negative trust or known scammer, others will find the signature not worth to try
hero member
Activity: 821
Merit: 1003
September 21, 2015, 10:39:32 PM
#7
after a couple of months probably, most signatures are only active for few weeks or months then are cancelled, I think it is only effective for a short time
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
scams hunter!
September 21, 2015, 10:28:07 PM
#6
asked guy with coinut sig Tongue
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 500
September 21, 2015, 10:24:38 PM
#5
honestly i don't think runnong a signature campaign is worthless because we don't even know that how many peoples are really watching the advertisement banners so that means we are paying some users for nothing and some users for something
Agree with you! But every product/firm/company need to be advertised in order to get the customers. And yes, advertisment (sig. Campaigns) will be worthless on some point, so it should be limited. And it'll always efective.
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
September 21, 2015, 10:16:30 PM
#4
honestly i don't think runnong a signature campaign is worthless because we don't even know that how many peoples are really watching the advertisement banners so that means we are paying some users for nothing and some users for something
hero member
Activity: 821
Merit: 1003
September 21, 2015, 10:11:28 PM
#3
signature campaigns?

they must be in some extention, or there would not be much campaigs around now
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1043
:^)
September 21, 2015, 09:10:58 PM
#2
i would think they are, i figure the service owners wouldnt bother running sig campaigns if they werent effective.
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 1000
September 21, 2015, 09:07:29 PM
#1
Are signatures actually effective? I've seen a lot of them and some have been around for many months. Wouldn't it be pointless to continue further after already having advertised for a couple of months?
Pages:
Jump to: