a special smart contract was deployed and everyone who wanted to receive a reward did it with its help
Thus, after the end of the bounty campaign, you introduced a new rules, one of which implied the need to spend ETH in order to receive tokens.
For example here
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.23687427wasted 0.077527716 ETH
I think that you just hope everyone forgot about the unpaid bounty.
Now I remember where is the problem. Thanks Rabbot
Also there:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.23838241
Note that despite the fact that we failed to raise the softcap in the framework of earlier conducted the TSO and the bounty we have no obligations to participants, We tried to accrue a bounty from the share of teams.
Silent Notary project did not reach a soft cap, but I see this token in some exchanges. This project is still alive?
quoting for future reference
@Sythyn you are asking me to remove negative trust.
I know for accusations that you or Silent notary refuse to pay bounty hunters or you change rules after the bounty ended. Can you give me proof that you or your team paid yours promises, and all the people who are participated in promotion in your ICO has ben paid?
I will remove my trust mark if you provide me with valid proof of your project
Yes, of course, we are ready to provide all the proofs. I'll do it while describing the situation at the same time.
Initially, we did not reach a soft cap and under the terms of the bounty, in this case, no one should not have received anything (
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.22049704).
But, nevertheless, we took account of the participants interests (
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.22414302) - a special smart contract was deployed and everyone who wanted to receive a reward did it with its help -
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.23483477. We did this because the vast majority of the bounty participants turned out to be bots. All the real ones, who wanted, received a reward -
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.29225459,
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.23638811,
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.23515642,
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.23518765,
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.23532792,
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.23559174,
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.23650424,
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.23655623,
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.23747974,
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.23748247,
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.24462632. Some participants who successfully received the payment even created additional instructions so that everyone could do it -
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.23748247Moreover, we extended the bounty payment period several times, as some people were late -
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.23253643.
The complaints were due to the fact that some people did not follow the instructions correctly, but all in all everyone who wanted it received all the bounties fully. We hope that you consider the fact that we extended the bounty payment period and, please, take into account all the links I posted above with the participant's gratitude about successful bounty payment.
Also, read my answer to Rabbot as well.
Yes, of course, the project is alive. We have just released our own blockchain Chain-in-Law and Ubikiri social network. You can make sure that it is working - all transactions made on the Chain-in-Law network, through the SilentNotary service and the Ubikiri social network, can be viewed using the Chain-in-Law Explorer -
https://explorer.ubikiri.com/It is true, that initially the soft cap has not been reached, accordingly we were not obliged to pay bounties. But we gave an opportunity to receive bounties, even considering that.
Our participants voted to restart, and that was done later. Moreover, on very favorable conditions for those who received bounties.