Topic: Simple argument for FPGA - page 2. (Read 2384 times)
Show me the math or STFU.
It is clear to me that manufactured ASIC's will always sell for more than they are worth (in returns).
It is also clear (to me) that specialized IC's (I did not use the term ASIC) are "what is up"
==> if professionally developed and marketed gear always costs too much, and integrated circuits are dominating...
enter FPGAs to the forefront of real profit for miners (the other profiteer being the manufacturers)
It is also clear (to me) that specialized IC's (I did not use the term ASIC) are "what is up"
==> if professionally developed and marketed gear always costs too much, and integrated circuits are dominating...
enter FPGAs to the forefront of real profit for miners (the other profiteer being the manufacturers)
OMG you breathe FUD....how many fpgas did you buy that you're trying to peddle off on the next quick impulse buyer via ebay ==I was the goofball that bought some like 2 months ago. Who says an ASIC isnt a specialized IC --- they are just that, the same thing: specialized and application specific.
It is clear to me that manufactured ASIC's will always sell for more than they are worth (in returns).
It is also clear (to me) that specialized IC's (I did not use the term ASIC) are "what is up"
==> if professionally developed and marketed gear always costs too much, and integrated circuits are dominating...
enter FPGAs to the forefront of real profit for miners (the other profiteer being the manufacturers)
It is also clear (to me) that specialized IC's (I did not use the term ASIC) are "what is up"
==> if professionally developed and marketed gear always costs too much, and integrated circuits are dominating...
enter FPGAs to the forefront of real profit for miners (the other profiteer being the manufacturers)
Jump to: