Simplistic fix for blocksize problem... - page 2.

MicroGuy

legendary

Activity: 2506

Merit: 1030

Twitter @realmicroguy

Quote from: JaredKaragen on September 29, 2015, 09:16:30 PM

I don't see why people can't wrap their heads around this simple concept..... and instead they would rather risk everything falling apart over a whole redesign of the currently stable system.

Input?

I don't think increasing the maximum blocksize to 8MB (static, not Gavin's crazy idea) would be a whole redesign of the current code. It's a tiny, tiny tweak.

Too bad Satoshi disappeared, this is what he would have done already.

DarkHyudrA

legendary

Activity: 1386

Merit: 1000

English <-> Portuguese translations

Oh god, how a perfect solution.
Such good scalable solution, everytime we need more we create Bitcoin(X+1)

Mickeyb

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 1000

Move On !!!!!!

Quote from: JaredKaragen on September 29, 2015, 09:16:30 PM

There is a stupid simple way to not destroy bitcoin's value and cause forks and still allow for wiggle room when it comes to blocksize:

For smaller faster transactions; just use a frikken altcoin thats based around speed....

That is all. Simple right?

I don't see why people can't wrap their heads around this simple concept..... and instead they would rather risk everything falling apart over a whole redesign of the currently stable system.

Input?

The problem is that people want the security of the Bitcoin network, even for small transactions. And if they are small, it doesn't mean that they are not valuable. You have merchants that just deal in many small transactions.

So all this time you were telling them that they will have security of the Bitcoin network and now you just need to tell them that it won't be Bitcoin but some other alt. That doesn't work this way!

There is no simple solution. If there was one, it would be implemented already!

meyns

newbie

Activity: 31

Merit: 0

Quote from: Kakmakr on September 30, 2015, 02:20:06 AM

Quote from: JaredKaragen on September 29, 2015, 09:16:30 PM

There is a stupid simple way to not destroy bitcoin's value and cause forks and still allow for wiggle room when it comes to blocksize:

For smaller faster transactions; just use a frikken altcoin thats based around speed....

That is all. Simple right?

I don't see why people can't wrap their heads around this simple concept..... and instead they would rather risk everything falling apart over a whole redesign of the currently stable system.

Input?

What do you tell to the 150 000+ merchants that already adopted Bitcoin? There is also millions of dollars invested into development of Bitcoin based businesses.

Your solution sounds simple, but it's a lot more complicated than that. The alternative would be to just lift the block size a bit, and see how it goes.

A lot of the merchants accepting bitcoin can already accept other altcoins.

zetaray

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

Using a different crypto is your solution for fixing bitcoin blocksize problem? That is not fixing anything, that is sending users away. We already have solutions to the problem, we just need to have a majority on one of them.

dothebeats

legendary

Activity: 3542

Merit: 1352

Cashback 15%

Using another altcoin to replace bitcoin just for the sake of speed is killing bitcoin itself. Also, a hardfork itself wouldn't kill bitcoin. By just not using bitcoin kills the entity itself.

ranochigo

legendary

Activity: 2982

Merit: 4193

Quote from: JaredKaragen on September 29, 2015, 09:16:30 PM

There is a stupid simple way to not destroy bitcoin's value and cause forks and still allow for wiggle room when it comes to blocksize:

For smaller faster transactions; just use a frikken altcoin thats based around speed....

That is all. Simple right?

I don't see why people can't wrap their heads around this simple concept..... and instead they would rather risk everything falling apart over a whole redesign of the currently stable system.

Input?

Bitcoin currently have much more stable value than alt coins. Many merchants only accept Bitcoin via bitpay or coinbase, asking people to switch to altcoins would not be a solution as their POS options is severely limited. Also, with the high hashrate of Bitcoin, it would be much more expensive for people to attack it instead of Bitcoin.

Kakmakr

legendary

Activity: 3458

Merit: 1961

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: JaredKaragen on September 29, 2015, 09:16:30 PM

There is a stupid simple way to not destroy bitcoin's value and cause forks and still allow for wiggle room when it comes to blocksize:

For smaller faster transactions; just use a frikken altcoin thats based around speed....

That is all. Simple right?

I don't see why people can't wrap their heads around this simple concept..... and instead they would rather risk everything falling apart over a whole redesign of the currently stable system.

Input?

What do you tell to the 150 000+ merchants that already adopted Bitcoin? There is also millions of dollars invested into development of Bitcoin based businesses.

Your solution sounds simple, but it's a lot more complicated than that. The alternative would be to just lift the block size a bit, and see how it goes.

gentlemand

legendary

Activity: 2590

Merit: 3014

Welt Am Draht

People moan about Bitcoin's volatility, that would be nothing compared to this mythical alt if it was subject to the whims of BTC usage.

Outlander

legendary

Activity: 1218

Merit: 1000

Quote from: JaredKaragen on September 29, 2015, 09:16:30 PM

There is a stupid simple way to not destroy bitcoin's value and cause forks and still allow for wiggle room when it comes to blocksize:

For smaller faster transactions; just use a frikken altcoin thats based around speed....

That is all. Simple right?

I don't see why people can't wrap their heads around this simple concept..... and instead they would rather risk everything falling apart over a whole redesign of the currently stable system.

Input?

You are going to create another altcoin. You are destroying it. Try to think in this way you are holding dozens of bitcoins.

jeffthebaker

legendary

Activity: 1526

Merit: 1034

You don't see why people don't simply just use another altcoin instead of Bitcoin? If you want to kill Bitcoin, it's not through a hardfork, but rather by simply not using it.

JaredKaragen

legendary

Activity: 1848

Merit: 1165

My AR-15 ID's itself as a toaster. Want breakfast?

There is a stupid simple way to not destroy bitcoin's value and cause forks and still allow for wiggle room when it comes to blocksize:

For smaller faster transactions; just use a frikken altcoin thats based around speed....

That is all. Simple right?

I don't see why people can't wrap their heads around this simple concept..... and instead they would rather risk everything falling apart over a whole redesign of the currently stable system.

Input?

Topic: Simplistic fix for blocksize problem... - page 2. (Read 1722 times)