We have an article on investopedia!
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/slimcoin-cryptocurrency.asp
and
https://decentralpost.com/2018/04/09/alternative-consensus-algorithms-how-does-proof-of-burn-work/amp/
Topic: Slimcoin | First Proof of Burn currency | Decentralized Web - page 54. (Read 137085 times)
Yes it's open-source.
It can still have errors, pool is still being debugged, will be up in several hours, so treat it as testnet.
It can still have errors, pool is still being debugged, will be up in several hours, so treat it as testnet.
ok,
for now the shares look validated but that's all.
Will wait until the pool is up.
Yes it's open-source.
It can still have errors, pool is still being debugged, will be up in several hours, so treat it as testnet.
It can still have errors, pool is still being debugged, will be up in several hours, so treat it as testnet.
is the source open? I see it is NOMP/uNOMP based.
minerd.exe -o stratum+tcp://206.189.86.177:3032 -u (slimcoin address) -p pass —hashtable 5 -s 20 -t (threads number)
Getting started is wrong.
Getting started is wrong.
Cool thanks,
Does the stats work ?
My worker does not appear.
K.
minerd.exe -o stratum+tcp://206.189.86.177:3032 -u (slimcoin address) -p pass —hashtable 5 -s 20 -t (threads number)
Getting started is wrong.
Getting started is wrong.
I cannot connect to the pool,
Could you give us a command line, maybe i did something wrong.
thanx
K.
Good news! I'll add it ASAP to the Slimcoin website, if you didn't already. (Edit: Added it to the English mining guide).
The next little project I'm pursuing for Slimcoin is another little tool for "Slimweb": a simplified command-line (and possibly afterwards graphical) tool to inscribe items like Torrent hashes via OP_RETURN transactions.
It will create raw transactions that send the transaction from a particular address/UTXO and execute them via the RPC interface (so you'll have to run a Slimcoin client). Today you have to create the raw transactions yourself if you want to control the address from where you make the inscription, which is a pretty difficult task for non-experts.
The next little project I'm pursuing for Slimcoin is another little tool for "Slimweb": a simplified command-line (and possibly afterwards graphical) tool to inscribe items like Torrent hashes via OP_RETURN transactions.
It will create raw transactions that send the transaction from a particular address/UTXO and execute them via the RPC interface (so you'll have to run a Slimcoin client). Today you have to create the raw transactions yourself if you want to control the address from where you make the inscription, which is a pretty difficult task for non-experts.
I would like to vote for Slimcoin | First Proof of Burn to get listed on octaex. How to vote on octaex please?
This is the voting page, but I don't see Slimcoin still. Hi Team/Community,
I would like to vote for Slimcoin | First Proof of Burn to get listed on octaex. How to vote on octaex please?
Thanks
We have pool!
http://206.189.86.177
http://206.189.86.177
It is great to see that the Slimcoin is still actively burning. Last time I got my Slimcoins was through Biter Exchange which probably has been long gone. I am still learning to get this burner working for the spring. Good jobs. 
Yeah it was crossed away, it's a scam
Careful with coinsmarkets exchange, looks like they've done some shady stuff, here are some details on the situation, also i saw slimcoin was traded there.
https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/8bqvcy/coinsmarkets_exit_scam_update/
https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/8bqvcy/coinsmarkets_exit_scam_update/
The Slimcoin Web2Web Test Gateway should work now. There was an additional fix needed (the webtorrent version was too old, I upgraded it). I tested it now and it connects to Torrent seeders and clients in different parts of Europe.
It is still necessary to enable mixed content in the browser (in Firefox, click on the green "lock" sign on the left in the address bar, in Chrome, a warning sign will appear just right of the address, click on it) .
You can also test the gateway for arbitrary SLM addresses. I recently had written a mini-tutorial on how to publish a page on "Slimweb".
Edit: I'm sorry if someone tested the test page it may have not worked - the virtual server from where I seeded the torrent had an outage, but now it works again.
Just out of curiosity:
What is the problem with coin control? I wonder what does it change in the model, as I thought it was only a graphical interface to the creation of raw transactions. Coin control, by the way, would be something very useful just for the inscription/web2web feature.
It is still necessary to enable mixed content in the browser (in Firefox, click on the green "lock" sign on the left in the address bar, in Chrome, a warning sign will appear just right of the address, click on it) .
You can also test the gateway for arbitrary SLM addresses. I recently had written a mini-tutorial on how to publish a page on "Slimweb".
Edit: I'm sorry if someone tested the test page it may have not worked - the virtual server from where I seeded the torrent had an outage, but now it works again.
Just out of curiosity:
... the havoc that PoS 2.0 and coin control will wreak on the (carefully-constructed) existing model.
What is the problem with coin control? I wonder what does it change in the model, as I thought it was only a graphical interface to the creation of raw transactions. Coin control, by the way, would be something very useful just for the inscription/web2web feature.
as you said, that it should be possible to rebase it on new v0.6 peercoin's base or not?
Not. Because of the havoc that PoS 2.0 and coin control will wreak on the (carefully-constructed) existing model.
It would be precipitate to implement profound changes to the emissions ratio without a detailed technical analysis and a fresh round of modelling.
Cheers
Graham
Well, I actually know some experianced developers now with c++ knowledge, I'll talk with them about it.
Also I know that Slimcoin has a lot of changes made different to PPC, but as you said, that it should be possible to rebase it on new v0.6 peercoin's base or not?
Just a thought, I know, that I'm not helping it, just a hinch. Because currently client is unusable when you try to load blockchain, for a few minutes.
Also I know that Slimcoin has a lot of changes made different to PPC, but as you said, that it should be possible to rebase it on new v0.6 peercoin's base or not?
Just a thought, I know, that I'm not helping it, just a hinch. Because currently client is unusable when you try to load blockchain, for a few minutes.
I think such "hard fork", should be proposed, and voted
I strongly recommend that you first contemplate the remuneration likely required by someone fluent in C++ and with extensive experience of the re-development of elderly Bitcoin clones.Cheers
Graham
Thanks for it. If you want please continue experiment, there were a lot of POS blocks recently, but it should go flat line and burn rewards will be higher and more recent.
I have recently filled in form to GBCAX exchange, and also maybe we could change PoS to 2.0 or 3.0 to be more precise and dont count time when client wasnt turn on (these poa blocks which are now flooding network would cease to exist). I must see, it would be a good upgrade (also peercoin have done such upgrade, so I consider, that we should also do it, because it's our main base we have forked from).
I think Graham said that it doesn't make sense, because people dont have incentive to upgrade from old clients, but I disagree - most people have upgraded from 0.3-0.4 to 0.5, and they have incentive to keep network robust and upgraded, to maintain it's health.
I think such "hard fork", should be proposed, and voted, but imo it would benefit us, with faster client loading up, abd many new features, such as newer bitcoin codebase and better PoS, more honest for everyone.
I would think about limiting PoS to 2% annually, but it's something maybe to think later.
I have recently filled in form to GBCAX exchange, and also maybe we could change PoS to 2.0 or 3.0 to be more precise and dont count time when client wasnt turn on (these poa blocks which are now flooding network would cease to exist). I must see, it would be a good upgrade (also peercoin have done such upgrade, so I consider, that we should also do it, because it's our main base we have forked from).
I think Graham said that it doesn't make sense, because people dont have incentive to upgrade from old clients, but I disagree - most people have upgraded from 0.3-0.4 to 0.5, and they have incentive to keep network robust and upgraded, to maintain it's health.
I think such "hard fork", should be proposed, and voted, but imo it would benefit us, with faster client loading up, abd many new features, such as newer bitcoin codebase and better PoS, more honest for everyone.
I would think about limiting PoS to 2% annually, but it's something maybe to think later.
Hi everyone,
I recently burned 10000 slimcoin, and have been keeping track of the results on a spreadsheet, with a graph of accumulated slimcoin minted by burn:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1b04jiUde-wWvyk7yXzWibVeYc03yz0MB/view?usp=sharing
So far, assuming a linear income (I know it is not, but don't have enough data to know how it is shaping), it looks like being 2 years before I start getting any actual return from my investment. That seems a bit too long for encouraging people to burn.
I recently burned 10000 slimcoin, and have been keeping track of the results on a spreadsheet, with a graph of accumulated slimcoin minted by burn:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1b04jiUde-wWvyk7yXzWibVeYc03yz0MB/view?usp=sharing
So far, assuming a linear income (I know it is not, but don't have enough data to know how it is shaping), it looks like being 2 years before I start getting any actual return from my investment. That seems a bit too long for encouraging people to burn.
Jump to: