Topic: So do you really think Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto? - page 3. (Read 5382 times)

craig is an arrogant prick from what I have seen and can't imagine him keeping a secret like that. He
seems like the type that would remind you daily that he invented bitcoin.

Because then when you look for a job, people will pay you MAJOR money to work for them since you created a world-changer.

What are you guys thinking about? he is totally not Satoshi Nakamoto

Interesting, but I don't know why you would want to fake it. Just having to deal with all the people harassing you when you don't even have any of the supposed bitcoins. Fame? Screw it if you ask me. Rather have the cash.

There is no proof in the article. There's plenty of circumstantial evidence and hints, but no proof. In contrast, there is absolute proof that some of their evidence was forged.

The Gizmodo article is pretty convincing if you ask me.

http://gizmodo.com/this-australian-says-he-and-his-dead-friend-invented-bi-1746958692

What I can't understand if the email was hacked and all the evidence was shown from the satoshi vistomail account. Then why from the same vistomail account did he then deny being Satoshi.

Fuck, one of these days I wish Maria6.0 would explain all this to me.

i'm not sure about this,but the only thing make me little to believe this is the fact of his news and about his arresting,and some fact when i'm seacrh on google,we all will find this :
Craigh Wright : Outed as the man behind the persona 'Satoshi Nakamoto', Craig Wright is believed to be the founder of Bitcoin.
but i dont too much care about who really he is.

just use your logic,while satoshi nakamoto trying to hide his personality by not going to show up on any media, craig wright suddenly claimed that he's nakamoto satoshi, its really odd, and why'd craig wright using japanese name? or he just addicted on japanese?

The two keys used to prove him has suspicious history. I do not believe he is Satoshi. From his action, if he is, he would have been exposed earlier.

I don't think he is satoshi nakamoto. Unless he can prove he's pgp key.

Maybe he was just only want to be famous. This issues has been happen several times ago.

Some people declare that he is satoshi nakamoto.

I don't think that Craig is Satoshi Nakamoto, why take so long to just reveal him self like this.
People won't just belief that he is for me doesn't matter who he is I like that he found it so. I am happy for it.

Nope ,Donald Trump is the new Satoshi .Fact is nobody is satoshi Nakamoto except Satoshi Nakamoto.Anybody can come up with such stupid shit and claim to be him.Criag weight is just some random dude trying to get attention by posting fake news.

Satoshi nakamoto wont let himself reveal on internet world.  And talk about bitcoin in media.
If he wanna be famous it would since bitcoin start

This guy craig just wanna be famous itself actually.

No, I think he was just a miner from the very beginning.  He has been cashing out and his writing is much different than satoshis.  He could just be a scammer looking to avoid taxes.

another misdirection of media i think,and lets be realistic,if craig was satoshi and bitcoin founder,why he's sold bitcoin and buy gold?he think bitcoin will be end?and so if you change your subject and search satoshi nakamoto on google,i think media will much more talking about satoshi as founder of bitcoin.

Great analogy here! And I wasn't aware that he only sent the public keys -- I thought it was private as well.

Not sure why are you making yet another thread on this guy since it has been discussed enough. This guy is a hoaxer and wanted fame to make people think that he created Bitcoin which gives you massive status in the tech world and would open any doors to your future projects and funding of those, it's not that hard to understand the motive.

I am sorry but I do not think he would let himself be discovered as easy as this.  I am sure he is out there and he if he is selling bitcoin out for a currency exchange, he will be doing it a little more low key than something like this. He has went through all of this to keep himself out of the light, then they want us to believe that he is out there now selling off $85m for gold.  Get real.  Media like that is for those who want something else to believe in.

Bitcoin copyrighted, perhaps I am misunderstanding what you are trying to say? The entire source code, and platform is released with an MIT license.  As long as you include the same license, everyone is free to copy, modify, distribute, monetize the software underlying Bitcoin, and most of the other cryptos..   Someone could trademark the name Bitcoin still, I think... Will have to check on that..

While a determined group may be able to exercise the ability to control all the nodes, install/implement custom software that doesn't allow inputs from targeted groups, or people.  That would inherently alienate the end-users.  I would think simply moving to a different altcoin not dominated by a single group would be the solution to that problem.  

When the people who are broadcasting bitcoin nodes, block finding/confirming transactions with miner, and crypto trading platforms are jailed, and/or charged for those activities.  Then you will know Bitcoin has been assimilated into the current monetary structure controlled by hierarchically established entities.  If you have to purchase a license to use send/receive cryptocurrency, ASIC mining hardware, from your state/government then you will know of centralized bitcoin control.  Nobody can freeze assets on the blockchain as is, it is imperative that it stays that way.  Even if senators, presidents, or other reps cry for control/regulation under ruses such as like money laundering(Physical USD is still the best for this), illegal markets, violation of current monetary laws, and other nefarious reasons to get the masses scared (Problem-Reaction-Solution time right? Pffft...) inherently obliging/supporting to all the proposed new laws around this "speculative commodity"/currency.  Look at who is all stuffing those shiny quarters in input slot of the Pseudo-Representative of the state/government proposing the new laws.  

Or, such is the case in the USA (most castrated country I think when it comes to monetary policy) watch for them ninja bills that seem to keep finding themselves attached to happier named bills that have no relation, to the primary bill.  Attached to pass.  If the house, and senate can pass through bills such as the original Patriot Act into law.  Anything is possible.