Topic: So I look for interesting alt coins to invest and I find Sexcoin (?) (Read 2792 times)

What you were doing is effectively advertising via the pictures of girls here in the ALT section.
So i am sure the problem mprep had was that it was low quality posting / advertising of sorts.
Had the pictures of girls been fully clothed i highly doubt the outcome would have been any different.

What bugs them here is low quality posting and advertising.

And this is suppose to be about discussing altcoins.. not advertising them.

I never heard about or had interest on this coin until i see this thread i. even after some research based on your comment i dint find any huge potentiality for this coin.Do you have any future prediction which is reliable?

I'm currently invested in BTC and other large cap coins. But I am seriously looking to invest (nothing big) on al alt coin with potential. Just a scan over coin mark cap website and well there's a lot of coins but one jumps out both on name, supply, and "history".

Sexcoin apparently has been around for a while. But it has not accomplished much apparently. I read through most of there main blog here in the forum and I see potential.

Any thoughts from anyone on the team or users?

That wasn't what the mod told us. That whole stupid explanation of at the start of the thread is what I had to do to remain 'compliant'. And it was a lengthy chain of communications with the moderators. Maybe I still misunderstand what was at issue.

Staff moved the one here in ALT main to the trash not because it posted nude pictures but because they felt it was poor quality advertising of sorts.

The topic revolved around posting a picture of a girl nude etc on a regular basis.
I had no problem with it
But staff must have figured it was low quality posting.

Since you put NSFW in the topic title it was fine.
You ARE allowed to post nudity.. so i am saying it was NOT deleted simply because there was some naked pics.

See what i mean ?

1. First of all You need check the Law requirements, and there is direct requirement of 18 U.S.C. 2257, and there is about "proof of age" and "the custodian of records".

2. I'm not a big expert in this issue.
It's a big work to attract models and users in such activity.
You need consider, that bandwitch and monitor are limited by any of models, and they shut off projects where are no money.

Also, the way we've implemented the verification actually implies that "better" is on the way. We've been looking at services like Sho-Card and a couple of others that offer very strong verification, and we have left room in the code to be able to 'fold-in' third-party verification schemes in the future. This is what we REALLY want to see.

1. First of all You need check the Law requirements, and there is direct requirement of 18 U.S.C. 2257, and there is about "proof of age" and "the custodian of records".

2. I'm not a big expert in this issue.
It's a big work to attract models and users in such activity.
You need consider, that bandwitch and monitor are limited by any of models, and they shut off projects where are no money.

1. Age verification is a self-reported verification

2. BTW, I'd love to talk to you about a cam project we've been brainstorming, any interest?

About what are You talking?
On the cam site the cam host heed to provide skans of ID and verify address.
Are You dreaming that some user of such site send to You similar data?

Where You have find the requirement of age verification for users, other of accepting the Site Rules?

Age Verification and Sexcoin

REPOST:

I wanted to take a minute and fill in some information about the age verification feature in the new client.  Age verification is a self-reported verification that is carried IN the transaction and written to the block-chain. This is accomplished through creating a flag field in the existing transaction version field. In effect, the high-byte of the transaction version carries the flags and the low-byte carries the transaction version.

We had a lot of discussion about the validity of 'self-reported' age-verification, and whether it was really worth putting into the client at all. The decision to write the feature in was accepted because self-reporting does provide merchants and end-users a certain amount of protection. If you doubt this, go to porn.com, and initiate a bitcoin purchase. This is processed with a button certifying your age. Pair that with the number of sites you can access with a button-click, and you can see that it does hold weight. In effect, the sender is certifying they are of age. As a merchant, the client has lied to you if they are not, so the client is culpable of fraud.

Also, the way we've implemented the verification actually implies that "better" is on the way. We've been looking at services like Sho-Card and a couple of others that offer very strong verification, and we have left room in the code to be able to 'fold-in' third-party verification schemes in the future. This is what we REALLY want to see.

I think the real power of this layout is that the flag is carried in the transaction, so it can be confirmed any time, by anyone (de-centralized ) in the future that age-verification was provided by looking up the transaction via the block-explorer.

Finally, I want to mention that age-verification offers protection both ways, and in some sense can make the coin useful in tangent with other payment schemes. I do picture a cam-to-cam scenario where both parties send age-verified coins to each other, providing an electronic signature that both are of age. Another scenario would be sending sexcoin with age-verification flags set as a side-transaction, with the bulk of the "traded-value" being doge or litecoin.

Lets try this again.

Thread History Newest to Oldest:

• https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12559375
• https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2689850
• https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2292819

Please be mindful of Bitcointalks posting rules:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7955645

age verification

As the lead dev for Sexcoin, I can tell you its not dead.

Our growth has been rocky, you can figure that out simply by reading through the threads. The original dev disappeared and a few of us that saw the potiential picked it up and kept it moving. If anyone is truly curious about the history I'd be happy to go through it, but will spare the thread the long read.

The russian that keeps being mentioned is a passionate supporter... and she's pretty hot   She can see the potential, the way the rest of us that believe in Sexcoin see it.

Right now, we're getting ready to release a new client that has age verification features. Cam-to-cam and token sites have always been high on our list of places sexcoin can carve out a niche, and age verification get's carried on the transaction level, so sexcoin can be sent with age verification attached. When the coins show up, it also reports if the sender has confirmed being over the age of consent, over 18 , over 21, or if no verification is given. We're hoping this can set the stage for deeper adaptation.

Past that, the potential we see is for all things adult oriented. From pay-per-view sites, to micro-transactions on porn sites, to adult toy-stores, to local fetish economies like artisans and service providers. Pretty much anything you would want some descretion involved in the transaction. So the android app ( which has been available ) coupled with age verification creates a pretty strong foundation for a coin.

There is zero reason for them to use some 3rd party coin as a token. It's nothing to create some "token" that the users can buy for money and they want to tie the value of that token to a far more stable currency like the USD as opposed to something volatile like a crypto coin. This is already established practice in both the porn (primarily cam sites) and game (primarily f2p) companies.

Get a bunch of pornstars to advertise it and watch it rise back into 'action'.

To be honest,apart from bitcoin and couple of others like a handful of them,every other altcoin is just to make profits.And there is nothing wrong with the process,being a trader myself,I love the altcoin culture but I never took any of them seriously since they were not meant to taken.Did you hear about the siacoin ? Unknowingly it's leading the charts now.