Topic: So Lauda is Theymos (Read 2922 times)
I do not think you understand what "corrupt" means. It is not possible for forum moderation staff to be "corrupt", as they are not in a position where they can receive money in exchange for special favors. Unless we are looking at forum staff of high positions who also happen to be managers of heavily promoted businesses on Bitcointalk, but that is another story.
i dont want make a problem with them 
include with user whom green trust that dangerous,apologize and find another way to resolve this problem,would be better
include with user whom green trust that dangerous,apologize and find another way to resolve this problem,would be better
lol! how can you call Lauda a bitch..??
He is not Theymos but he is a scammer see this topic https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.19346365
We all know that Theymos is living on a tropical island, swimming through a huge pile of Bitcoins like Scrooge McDuck.
Or is that the 2016 meme? In 2017 Theymos is creating alt-accounts to give negative ratings.
Maybe someone can trace his IP address? But good luck, hes behind 7 proxies...
Or is that the 2016 meme? In 2017 Theymos is creating alt-accounts to give negative ratings.
Maybe someone can trace his IP address? But good luck, hes behind 7 proxies...
Omg reading this thread makes my brain hurt. Should we link these stupid people to that thread that explains how the trust system works here? It seems kind of odd to show a legendary member but seriously I don't think he understands (also a few randoms don't get it but whatever.).
So OP I guess Theymos employing Lauda then firing her is some sort of long con...? What's the benefit there? Pretend to moderate the forum for years and pay yourself minimum wage (I'm assuming, idk what mods make) into another bitcoin address? Seems legit. Theymos definitely has nothing better to do than create alts and make them into staff members, fire them, etc. Actually this whole forum is the exact same as "The Bloody Board" but on a much bigger scale.
So OP I guess Theymos employing Lauda then firing her is some sort of long con...? What's the benefit there? Pretend to moderate the forum for years and pay yourself minimum wage (I'm assuming, idk what mods make) into another bitcoin address? Seems legit. Theymos definitely has nothing better to do than create alts and make them into staff members, fire them, etc. Actually this whole forum is the exact same as "The Bloody Board" but on a much bigger scale.
well Theymos is a nice guy but yes if he gives DT spots to cunts & extortionist like Lauda and yahoo then well he too is either involved or unaware about the crimes Lauda does.
Theymos did not put Lauda, nor yahoo in the Default Trust network. Theymos manages and has control of the account called "Default Trust", and would have added users such as OgNasty and Blazed into DT network by adding them to the trust list of that "account", making both OgNasty & Blazed DT Level 1. There are of course more people in DT1, these are just 2 examples.
When those 2 users add people into their trust list, the users added become DT Level 2. So again, theymos did not add Lauda into Default Trust. Blazed did. If you have an issue with that, you should contact Blazed and explain why you think they shouldn't be in DT. Good luck with that though..
well Theymos is a nice guy but yes if he gives DT spots to cunts & extortionist like Lauda and yahoo then well he too is either involved or unaware about the crimes Lauda does.
Why so many people are against Lauda? What did this person did bad against you? [...]
Look at the trust rating of those people... That should tell you enough.
Lauda is a campaign manager (and former forum moderator) who takes the task(-s) very seriously.
This automatically means that a lot of people who do "stupid" things get Lauda on their back... with good reason.
Now that Lauda made a big mistake (for which a severe punishment followed) they all "smell blood"...
And it's not "many people", it just seems that way because they all came out crawling from under the woodwork now...
The vast majority of (decent) people on this forum still trust Lauda.
Why so many people are against Lauda? What did this person did bad against you?
Also trust from simple default trust members has 0 affect on trust rating and on another side it's correct because some people are giving silly trust and some of them are for no readon but as you mentioned correctly, such trust rating is bad at the same time, yes, it has it's negative and positive side.
BTW do you think that trust which was left from lauda wasn't correct? If yes, than what do you think, why did he/she do this on you and why isn't lauda giving me red trust me if he/she is so unfair?
I want to say, if Lauda is unfair in giving red trust, than why isn't he giving me red trust? I am member of this forum as you.
BTW Lauda isn't alt of theymos and on another hand, quickseller said that he/she isn't alt of theymos and I believe because quickseller is saying trust in similar situation, really, if lauda would be alt, no one would be able to stop quickseller's posts against lauda.
Also trust from simple default trust members has 0 affect on trust rating and on another side it's correct because some people are giving silly trust and some of them are for no readon but as you mentioned correctly, such trust rating is bad at the same time, yes, it has it's negative and positive side.
BTW do you think that trust which was left from lauda wasn't correct? If yes, than what do you think, why did he/she do this on you and why isn't lauda giving me red trust me if he/she is so unfair?
I want to say, if Lauda is unfair in giving red trust, than why isn't he giving me red trust? I am member of this forum as you.
BTW Lauda isn't alt of theymos and on another hand, quickseller said that he/she isn't alt of theymos and I believe because quickseller is saying trust in similar situation, really, if lauda would be alt, no one would be able to stop quickseller's posts against lauda.
I am confused that kiklo says that theymos has made trust system a rigged one so isn't the thread belongs to meta?
The thread title says theymos = lauda, which seems to be the main point kiklo wants to communicate, hence a Reputation topic.He's been quiet ever since he got exposed for selling a DT account to a known scammer.
No way :O~snip~
Obvious sig spammer and paid off by Lauda.(sorry, zephy <3)
Hey ,
I Tried to move on and the bitch negative rated my new screen name, so how can I move on when the bitch keeps attacking me.
You can't escape a negative rating by creating an alt. Actually, if you try to covertly do this, you are making yourself even less trustworthy.I Tried to move on and the bitch negative rated my new screen name, so how can I move on when the bitch keeps attacking me.
FYI:
I got banned because Lauda is Theymos!
No. You got banned because you broke several forum rules and I kept reporting your posts.I got banned because Lauda is Theymos!
They are not the same.
LOL your accusation is so ridiculous that even QUICKSELLER calls bullshit!ROFLOLOLOLOLOL Basically sais it all, doesn't it...
They are not the same.
Exactly what i wish to say.I am confused that kiklo says that theymos has made trust system a rigged one so isn't the thread belongs to meta??
@Lauda i believe that you have first left the negative feedback on kilko right? If the war started for the scaling issue of bitcoin as a discussion then it should not be negative as everyone has different view on a particular issue, even trolling to small extent can be tolerated. would like to hear why you consider OP to be red tagged as from start before this feedback war started.
chevas They are not the same.
LOL your accusation is so ridiculous that even QUICKSELLER calls bullshit!ROFLOLOLOLOLOL Basically sais it all, doesn't it...
[...]Kiklo has left the Building [...]
Byebye, don't forget to close the door!
Just to explain how you do that (because you don't seem to grasp the basic concepts of forum participation):
go to your profile, change your email into some gibberish, then change your password to some gibberish too...
and then log off, please.
You, sir, are what most of us sane individuals refer to as a conspiratard. You're seeing all these red tags and negative trust because of your profile and account settings. By default, accounts are set to only display trust scores based on Default Trust members of the forums. That's clearly stated on the trust settings page. Second, quit your bitching. In my experiences on the forums, I've only seen people get red tagged because of their incompetence to follow basic instructions and rules.
With all that said, good riddance. We don't need users like you on this site.
With all that said, good riddance. We don't need users like you on this site.
That asshole Lauda aka Theymos, just banned my account ,
So that is it , enjoy this bunch of Lying Sons of Bitches.
Kiklo has left the Building
FYI:
I got banned because Lauda is Theymos!
So that is it , enjoy this bunch of Lying Sons of Bitches.
Kiklo has left the Building
FYI:
I got banned because Lauda is Theymos!
I can login with a newbie account and
this is what I See under Lauda Name
Psychotic Bitch™
View Profile Personal Message (Offline)
Trust: 81: -0 / +11
and this is what a newbie sees under my name
Trust: -8: -3 / +0
Warning: Trade with extreme caution!
So one of you Genius explain how the bitch can red tag my ass, like we are in the same trust network , yet , when I red tag her , it is hidden under untrusted.
Explain?
FYI:
This was my account created to move on , and the bitch red tagged it, when it had never communicated with her.
Because I was done, but she/ theymos is the asshat that provoked another response.
this is what I See under Lauda Name
Psychotic Bitch™
View Profile Personal Message (Offline)
Trust: 81: -0 / +11
and this is what a newbie sees under my name
Trust: -8: -3 / +0
Warning: Trade with extreme caution!
So one of you Genius explain how the bitch can red tag my ass, like we are in the same trust network , yet , when I red tag her , it is hidden under untrusted.
Explain?
FYI:
This was my account created to move on , and the bitch red tagged it, when it had never communicated with her.
Because I was done, but she/ theymos is the asshat that provoked another response.
Kiklo, if you genuinely think that Lauda = theymos, then you really are delusional. These little temper tantrums you are having repeatedly are not doing you any favours. Just accept what has happened and move on. You are acting like you have become obsessed with Lauda at this point. Christ man, grow up.
Hey ,
I Tried to move on and the bitch negative rated my new screen name, so how can I move on when the bitch keeps attacking me.
FYI:
She refers to herself as a psychotic bitch, I only left off the psychotic.
How many other extortionist are allowed to run around like lauda with their negative trust being hidden?
FYI2:
@kingcolex feel free to just fuck off!
No one will miss you.
Others that also realize the Trust System is Bullshit.
To sum up:
Gregory Maxwell is shit
Bitcointalk.org trust system is shit
Whoever invented it thought shit
Whoever has a different opinion about it than me now is also shit.
Gregory Maxwell is shit
Bitcointalk.org trust system is shit
Whoever invented it thought shit
Whoever has a different opinion about it than me now is also shit.
Am I the only one here thinking kiklo is a bought account? There's no way a legendary member could be this stupid about how bitcointalk works. Then again, I tend to underestimate people's ability to be stupid and am surprised daily by same.
OK , explain it to me,
how is it lauda can label me with red ink and when I returned the negative feedback , it goes to the untrusted feedback for her and does not show up when viewed from everyone else account. But hers shows up under my trusted feedback.
Why does she get to label me in a trusted feedback but my replies are hidden in her untrusted feedback.
Because the bitch is not trustworthy at all.
Explain?
FYI:
Saw this on your account name.
Trust: -4: -3 / +4
Warning: Trade with extreme caution!
They are not the same.
LOL your accusation is so ridiculous that even QUICKSELLER calls bullshit!
Jump to: