Topic: So many Bounties-Which one is trusted? - page 64. (Read 6266 times)
You shouldn't trust anybody. Even good and prospective project can be scam. And I saw it many times. Sometimes modest project become very profitable. So if you want earning - take a lot of bounties. Some will be scam, some will be normal.
Like with ICOs, you can't really tell. You have to do proper research and trust your experience and knowledge.
There Bountyhive and bounty0x platform, you can simply use it that site manage by experienced member from here. and most of them not require you to put a report of tweet or facebook post to their bounty thread, so its much simple and easy to use.
I usually check the one who is managing the bounty, managers like Sylon, deadley, atriz and many more is seems to be legit because they will check the project first before they get it. Also check the project and the people behind it to see if their are reputable and trust worthy.
Most of the bounty threads are believable.
But choosing an excellent ICO project is key. If the ICO project does not complete crowdfunding, then the bounty will not be distributed, and even distribution will be worthless.
But choosing an excellent ICO project is key. If the ICO project does not complete crowdfunding, then the bounty will not be distributed, and even distribution will be worthless.
I have checked the latest active bounties on bountylord.com and found many of them but only few are rated as 3 or 4 so any of you here working for any of those bounties listed there and found it trusted source of earning stakes/tokens/coins... I want to do the twitter campaign...
most of Bounties is trusted! But you can seaching more info before you want o join!Best way to check old Bounties member and ask them about it!
The most important thing to do is to look for bounty campaign being run by highly respected managers, because they won't want to do anything to hurt their image, and also the quality of the project, if it is one project you can't invest into don't bother touch it, because that means it doesn't worth spending time marketing what you yourself will not invest into so how are you going to convince others to invest into it, because the amount most bounty campaigns give out is tied to the success of token sale
Are you looking for a bounty that can be trusted ? https://bounties.biz is the answer 
bounties.biz is a collection of bounty programs managed by AmaZix Team.
So who is AmaZix ?
AmaZix are a group of professional crypto ICO consultants who have technical expertise, are excellent at support and are led by an elite team of managers. You can find more information about this here : http://www.amazix.com/#
bounties.biz is a collection of bounty programs managed by AmaZix Team. So who is AmaZix ?
AmaZix are a group of professional crypto ICO consultants who have technical expertise, are excellent at support and are led by an elite team of managers. You can find more information about this here : http://www.amazix.com/#
For me in order to get a good bounty.You have to check the project proposal,read the whitepaper if they have strong foundation,review the developers if all of them are legit because many ico nowadays using a picture on internet it is called identity theft,another way to choose bounty is to check their social media accounts ot telegram if they are professional and well mannered when asssisting a customer.Read more about the project then after that you can decide.
I have checked the latest active bounties on bountylord.com and found many of them but only few are rated as 3 or 4 so any of you here working for any of those bounties listed there and found it trusted source of earning stakes/tokens/coins... I want to do the twitter campaign...
we have a lot of bounty here in forum so better to choose who run it so choose trusted actually all are trusted but some not go welltry to gain experience about bounty for your knowledge and for your future in crypto
Everybody here take the risk like in bounty and in trading to earn so better to always try anything here about crypto.
Just an addition to others opinion aside from the manager it can also be determine by checking their websites,whitepaper,roadmap or the overall plan of their project.The mass of its participant is also a proof of its legitimacy,members would not apply to a bounty if it is a scam.
I have checked the latest active bounties on bountylord.com and found many of them but only few are rated as 3 or 4 so any of you here working for any of those bounties listed there and found it trusted source of earning stakes/tokens/coins... I want to do the twitter campaign...
In this case the best bounty is the bounties which managed by expert manager like yahoo or atriz or other legendary member with many positive thrust. Especially for yahoo, may be he has ability to find scammers because he has many experience in cryptocurrency. But it's only my oppinion. 
I have checked the latest active bounties on bountylord.com and found many of them but only few are rated as 3 or 4 so any of you here working for any of those bounties listed there and found it trusted source of earning stakes/tokens/coins... I want to do the twitter campaign...
bounties that can be trusted are those who have good management, quick response to each participant, always update about the progress of the project.
So many Bounties-Which one is trusted? Well those projects that are useful and so kany members are the ine that needs to be trusted.
Before following an ico bounty, you may check the project site or ann thread and explored the white paper for you to deciding are the project legit enough, also you can review their team, and you may decide do you want to follow the project or not.
I think the trusted bounty is when they have good management about the weekly report, when they always routine review the report and show the report, I think they have good management, so it always give me trust to them
just because its a hot ICO doesn't mean it's trustable or profitable . take a look at bitconnect it was so popular but some people i know lost all their money in it , another example ARK , so many hunters and good ICO ,YET it wasn't profitable at all to any hunter . take some time to study different aspects of the project and you will find a good one for you .
Whilst it's a good idea to follow bounties with high scores by trusted sources, they are not always accurate. Some bounties that are highly advertised as trustworthy end up being scams, not allocating the tokens promised, or are absolutely saturated with too many other bounty hunters.
If you take a little risk and go with the ones that aren't as widely known - the smaller and unknown ones - you will have less competition from fellow bounty hunters and thus the potential to earn a lot more. With higher risk comes potentially greater reward. Do your own due diligence and research in the project before promoting it.
If you take a little risk and go with the ones that aren't as widely known - the smaller and unknown ones - you will have less competition from fellow bounty hunters and thus the potential to earn a lot more. With higher risk comes potentially greater reward. Do your own due diligence and research in the project before promoting it.
Yes. Absolutely agree with that. I am consulted by two bounty hunters who already has successfully results for last 6 months.
As for smaller ones - yes, it's true. I participated in Aigang Bounty. It wasn't very widely known project. But I had trusted and finally I made more that $1000 in eth and still have big part of coins.
Whilst it's a good idea to follow bounties with high scores by trusted sources, they are not always accurate. Some bounties that are highly advertised as trustworthy end up being scams, not allocating the tokens promised, or are absolutely saturated with too many other bounty hunters.
If you take a little risk and go with the ones that aren't as widely known - the smaller and unknown ones - you will have less competition from fellow bounty hunters and thus the potential to earn a lot more. With higher risk comes potentially greater reward. Do your own due diligence and research in the project before promoting it.
If you take a little risk and go with the ones that aren't as widely known - the smaller and unknown ones - you will have less competition from fellow bounty hunters and thus the potential to earn a lot more. With higher risk comes potentially greater reward. Do your own due diligence and research in the project before promoting it.
I think it is a reasonable way, but I think if some projects are very hot with a lot of bounty hunters and followers, the ico maybe very successful and the bounty hunters can get their tokens since the dev team have enough tokens to distributed and they will not risk to let them down.
Whilst it's a good idea to follow bounties with high scores by trusted sources, they are not always accurate. Some bounties that are highly advertised as trustworthy end up being scams, not allocating the tokens promised, or are absolutely saturated with too many other bounty hunters.
If you take a little risk and go with the ones that aren't as widely known - the smaller and unknown ones - you will have less competition from fellow bounty hunters and thus the potential to earn a lot more. With higher risk comes potentially greater reward. Do your own due diligence and research in the project before promoting it.
If you take a little risk and go with the ones that aren't as widely known - the smaller and unknown ones - you will have less competition from fellow bounty hunters and thus the potential to earn a lot more. With higher risk comes potentially greater reward. Do your own due diligence and research in the project before promoting it.
Jump to: