actually I am kind of glad this happened. because finally, either I will be proven wrong and I'll gladly accept it, or we see that I am right and maybe people start looking at other things than just price and marketcap when it comes to comparing an altcoin to bitcoin.
let ethereum become bigger, more used.
let the number of transaction on its network increase to near bitcoin's level.
let ethereum network be "stress tested" for 3 years, something that we have been experiencing in bitcoin with the same name but it is really spam attack.
let the transaction fees grow to $0.75 (currently there) and then $1 and then $2 and so on.
let the size of their blockchain get extremely big and centralizes the nodes
let the mining of it become big and let China get in on it and start their farms with new more efficient equipments.
let another DAO scam and another roll back hard fork and a chain split happen.
and lots more, and then lets see how they will do in real world not just on exchanges and on paper with some numbers showing bigger marketcap because they simply have 6 times more the supply of bitcoin but not even half its circulating supply or distribution.
the point is active DEV is taking place on ETH
The difference is that if the ETH devs were inactive there would be no way out.
Bitcoin has clear alternatives like Rootstock and BU, and whether or not people like them is another matter - the point is that Bitcoin has the opportunity to change, while ETH's development is so heavily centralised that its path seems fully dictated by Buterin.
More tokens could be created in future versions for all we know, considering that they hard fork at a rate of fifty hard forks per second.
ETH is like the evil genius of the crypto world, getting bigger and more evil as it goes on.