Topic: social distancing ? covid - page 2. (Read 644 times)

While there is a kernel of truth in what you say, most of it is an emphasis of BS.

The social distance between Covid-19 can protect us from infection with the virus. there's an opportunity of spreading the disease through sneezing and coughing. He instructed to wear a mask when getting to Bauer. If possible use a tissue when sneezing and coughing in order that the droplets don't spread to others. then the tissue should be discarded and hands should be washed with soap and water. By following the etiquette of sneezing and coughing along side social distance it's possible to stay the people within the vicinity free from infections like flu or Covid-19.

There is no other word that every meeting with many people in a closed building even though using the air conditioner, can be sure that there will be massive transmission that can occur.
Indeed, there is no other alternative at any time in the room not to linger because it can be ascertained that airborne transmission is very fast. Besides, it can be ascertained that in one room no one carries the Covid-19 virus with the results of the tests that have been carried out.

what is feared is that this spread is carried home without realizing it and spreads all the families which is clear. This is certainly very terrible news if it happens. In other words, people should always adhere to simple health protocols, wash their hands every time they hold anything, keep wearing a mask, not stay close to each other for too long, at least this helps narrow the transmission.

I don't think there is a way to stop spreading the virus at home, practicing social distancing from your loved ones seems to harash. Unfortunately this means that if one person is affected from corona the hole household would need to placed under qarantine. But atleast you are with your family..

The biggest risk in my opinion is with mass gatherings indoors like in churches or concerts. It happened many times in the past months that one person infected hundreds others just by being in the same room for a long period of time. Stopping these super spreaders would be very important.

It seems that most people who contact the virus, get infected in their homes. Staying in a closed environment means that if one person gets infected, then evrty one in the household is likely to catch it. The ones that don't seem to be the ones who go out, got a mild infection, and built up a natural immunity.

It really is time that we stopped believing all the nonsense that is being pushed out by the Pharma companies, and we just adopted sensible healthy lifestyles. That way we can save the billions that are going down the Pharma toilet, and we can get back to work. More people are dying from the effects of the lock downs, than are dying from all of the viruses combined.

The last option for people who really want to stay safe is by staying at their home, and don't go everywhere, even if the new normal has been starting in his country. He will not get infected if he decides that, but the consequences will be too difficult for him because he needs to order everything online. He doesn't have to bother following the health protocols because he doesn't go out and enjoy his time at his homes.

but there is renewable news that has happened in my country but there has not been any major publication by the government because there are steps that must be taken before it will be mass produced.

One of the universities in my country has found a covid-19 drug so it's no longer a vaccine, instead the vaccine is still in phase 3 and it still takes time. The drug that have been reported in our national news have been tested and have 90% accuracy, of course this is the best news.

We will be receiving possible updates for the next few weeks about this drug as the announcement was just made on August 19th yesterday.

Covid has traveled around the world long ago. It is carried, just like billions of other viruses, by the air currents in the atmosphere. All this mask stuff is entirely useless. Everybody has Covid already, long ago.

See: https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=wafting+viruses+around+the+world+by+air+currents&ia=web.

Even if you follow every safety measures which are suggested by WHO and governments still you can't sure about getting free from infection then why people should bother lot of things which is not going to save them anyways and also people aware that it is not a deadly virus and the mortality is nowhere near the other diseases causing deaths every year so people taking these things are easy nowadays.

That's not a bug; it's a feature.  It is the excuse to put cell towers in every light-post.  Power levels drop off with respect to distance as a cubed function.  A light pole out on the street near one's house can achieve the same power levels against a target with a tiny amount of the power necessary for a large tower 500 meters away.

It is also worth understanding distance from a wave generating source (a tower) is really not as important as it was in technology prior to 5G.  What they are doing is trying to get waves from multiple towers to interefere in certain ways at distinct points in space.  By playing with the timings they can move the points in space where the waves happen to resonate with one another.

Certain of the 5G stuff I've read said straight-up that some of the tricks they would like to use are obviated when two target receivers (e.g., cell phones) are too close to one another.  'Too close' was not defined because it was not describing a particular system.  Just a concept that the technology anticipates making use of.  Anyway, having availed myself of some of these concepts, the 'social distancing' really does seem to fit the 5G testing hypothesis better than some flying spit thing.  Especially in light of the observations about how and where it is strongly enforced.

5G wasn't enough. They already have 6G in the works... and who-knows-what-else. So far most 5G doesn't extend far beyond the towers.

At least, with social distancing, people can prevent virus spread. But that will depend on how people can follow the health protocols from the government because many people seems to underestimate the virus by not wearing a mask, using hand sanitizer or wash their hands, or careful when they are in the public area. It needs awareness from the people about preventing the virus.

"Social distancing" is nothing more than a way of going live with 5G before the technology and infrastructure is ready for higher geospacial resolutions.  That will come with the higher frequencies...the initial implementations are using typical well used frequency ranges currently used for 4G, wi-fi, etc.

This is why 'social distancing' is fiercely enforced in only a handful of large cities where the heavy development is being undertaken.  Social distancing is given lip-service in most places, but most people pay no attention to it and the authorities don't really care that much.  If you are in a place where men with guns help you follow the IMF/WHO distancing guidance then you are probably in an one of the test-bed cities.

Social distancing protocols are not considered as a safety measure by the people because they found the virus can spread even if you are few metres away from the infected on via air so why need to follow it anymore?

Okay. You speak some serious talk. I like that. So, what does the scientific method say about science theory? Is science theory fact or not? Here's what I mean.

We have only seen viruses since the advent of the electron microscope (EM). So, we DO know that they exist. However, whatever they are, and how they really work is something that researchers have had to more or less assume, and even guess at, over the years. Why? Because you can't see a living virus actually moving and doing its "thing" in an EM. You can't even see them in color in an EM.

Over the years there have been other microscopes that some claimed they could use to see living viruses. The medical society doesn't accept most of these. But they do accept the Microsphere Nanoscope (MN), invented in 2011. Using the MN, one can actually watch living, moving viruses, and lots of other things.

The question is, does what we see in the MN confirm all the assumptions about viruses from over the years? Or does in show we were mistaken? Or is the verdict still out because of the complexity that we are seeing with the MN?


Please be patient with me.

Consider the methods used for isolating and identifying viruses... and other things. Way back in 1889, Dr. Koch revised his process for identifying tiny particles... like viruses. In 1937, Dr. Thomas Rivers upgraded Dr. Koch's Postulates. Others have refined even Rivers'.

The point is that there are processes that have to followed to get a pure sample of a virus from a sick or dead person. Since you are a person who is connected with the medical, please find us both a report that follows Dr. Rivers' process (or a better one) properly, so that we can determine that Covid was even identified in the first place, back in 2003.

Regarding why I am asking this, there is a doctor, Dr. Andrew Kaufman, who says that the identification work surround the SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 was sloppily done. This means that the viruses weren't really identified. No identification means we are basing all of what we are doing with Covid on false info.

See: https://pieceofmindful.com/2020/05/25/sloppy-virology/.



Then go here https://www.andrewkaufmanmd.com/ and watch the video. More videos can be found at https://www.bitchute.com/. Search on both "Kaufman" and "Andrew Kaufman."

Then, find us both some properly done, basic, Covid-identification reports so we can see that Covid really exists... or not.

I definitely don't do this and I know you don't either. The fact that we're on this forum is indicative of the fact that neither of us trust the media.

I believe in the scientific method, but I know that bad science is published and shared, especially once an issue has been politicized. I don't trust the WHO, I don't trust the media.
I come from a family of doctors. I know people who work in hospitals, I know people who have intubated patients who are on their last legs, I know people who have contracted covid and have lived, I knew people who contracted covid and died.

Some people who get it have no symptoms, some people who get it have long term symptoms, some people die. This isn't the flu, it's just not.

We don't know if herd immunity will work —time will tell in Sweden's case— it looks like things are getting better there (though I think it would be silly to not recognize the fact that the government eventually endorsed social distancing measures, as well as limiting the size of large gatherings). I'm going to continue keeping my distance, avoiding unnecessary travel, and wearing a mask (like the MAJORITY of people in my city) since the statistics have shown these choices keep the infection curve flatter.

If you'd like to go out and put yourself and others at risk, you can do that, though I hope you don't regret the damage that you do.

You were the one with your blinders on. You knew that I was standing in front of the oncoming train. You knew that I saw it coming and then closed my eyes. But you didn't see where the track curved away from me before the train got to me. Enough about trains already.

You go to the movies and believe everything you see about X-men and Galaxy Guardians. So when the media bluffs you, you simply accept everything they say.

I don't mind that you wear masks. If they work so well, what are you worried about? You're protected, right? Lol. Stay ignorant about what is really going on. Ignorance is bliss, right?

If you stand in front of an oncoming train and then close your eyes, it doesn't mean the train isn't going to hit you, it just means you won't see it.

If there is a second wave, then it will be the result of manufactured fake stats. Most people now have immunity to what has transpired to be a minor epidemic. As yet, no healthy person has died from the virus. but they suppress that info with fake stats, You know that Big Pharma is concerned about the population becoming immune, because they are rushing to bypass all the safety precautions that are in place to check vaccines. It takes a minimum of 4 years to provide basic tests, and probably in excess of 20 years to ensure safety. Current testing just looks for the production of antibodies created from synthetic viruses, and evaluates the pharmaceuticals that are required to overcome the side effects. Hopefully they won't allow any vaccines to be adopted for mass use - we can't afford the resulting medical costs involved in treated the cripples that will be created.

Very soon, there is no need to have social distancing but as long as the area you are living isn't yet confirmed and proclaimed to be a COVID-19 free area, you have to obey.

Meanwhile, some good news.

China grants country's first COVID-19 vaccine patent to CanSino: state media