Have you seen the recent development that the court has now backed the banks to demand customers submit their social media handles as part of their KYC requirements? What do you think of this?
I may have got some positive thoughts towards this development but I bet if the government would stick by it and remains genuine to the society.
Allegedly I don't think if this was a specific for KYC sake to pressure threats of not leaving the Cyber thefts with any loopholes of making away succeedingly after executing their criminal activities.
So what happens to the NIN and the rest government issued I.Ds being used to verify our accounts as also part of KYCs? Are those system outdated just so sudden after put to mandatory as part of the banking exercises?
And what interest would they (government) perform to enhance cyber security networks so that our social media handles can always remain an uncompromiseable privacy away from cyber criminals?
What a nonsense. I have lost several of my social media handles in different networks due to the fragility of how our local security internet protocols are being too weak to be impenetrable to hackers.
So what happens when I loses by social handle like after linking it to my banks details?
I hope that seems to have us more exposed not just as easy to lost our social media Privacies but also as a medium to have our bank accounts at risk from the so Cyber criminals.
On the other way round, I believe such development is basically implemented for the government to have us all on track, pin us at a point of internet imprisonments where we would not have the privilege of freedom of speech anymore.
They have long way understood how the masses has been using the internets such as social handles in different networks to have them (government) being exposed with their disapproving and unpleasant governing conducts.
So they just want to have us in a chain and take total control of us that not even in the internet world can be live a non custodial privilege.
If that eventually takes effectiveness, then we are totally prisoners to the governments.
I think such related bill was was proposed by Sen. Bala N'Allah since 2015 about the conducts of moderating Cyber expression and how victims violating the law should be imprisoned to 2 years or pay a fin for about $10,000 if I don't get it wrong.
So basically I don't see this development to offer advance well-being to the society but of the governments self-interests.
And what do you think of this if crypto exchanges start demanding social media accounts as part of their KYC requirements?
What matters is to keep reputations and respects dealers self custodial rights also to maintain reliable source so, if the crypto today come to an end in request of investors and traders social media for KYC, no problem about that, if we haven't been indicted with the current KYCs by the Crypto networks and they could also maintain such reputation, so be it but all is needed by Crypto enthusiasts is Privacies to our crypto assets and also for the non-custodial network of the Crypto currencies not to be compromised where the government would then take charge of the decentralized blockchains.