Firstly you have shown yourself as an idiot on prior occasions, that is lacking intelligence, and you also have shown yourself to be someone hot headed who flies off the handle and would rather create drama than debate. If someone like you is working for a company in the "upper reaches", I don't care what company it is, we do not want your business. Your company is obviously steps away from failure or scamming others with people like you in charge. All under the presumption you are actually have a job because with the way you portray yourself I don't see how anyone cannot see you as anything other than a pimply nosed teenager with a bad attitude. This last post of yours is the most coherent I've seen of you, obviously trying to act the part now I guess.
I think the saddest part about your post, indeed your entire philosophy, is that you think the place of a currency is to deign to select those businesses worthy to offer themselves to you for consideration. Imagine a world where anyone looking to make a transaction had to be accepted into the "club" to be able to exchange his tokens for the other fellow's widgets. Is it conceivable to you that such a condition might create a barrier to wider adoption? Does it seem that maybe the brand of token, or even the flavor of the token, might not be better to be unimportant, as it really has nothing to do with the exchange?
The purpose of any currency is to facilitate exchange. It is easier to use tokens of value than to haul different units of barter around in the back of a truck whenever one needs to make an exchange. Having any currency controlled by a cabal, or an abusive and seemingly irrational spokesperson, is not a formula to encourage others to use it. Neither is having a stated philosophy of opposition to government, law and order.
Apparently discussing this fact, teasing you about this this fact, openly insulting your intelligence and beating you over the head with this fact, and publicly proclaiming the fact through analysis of the continuous failure of your pet project, has not educated you on the basics of a transactional model.
Coming to a functional currency screaming that your project is going to rule the world, and now, simply due to manipulation by you and your confederates, an insignificant spike in value happened for a matter of minutes doesn't change the simple fact that your premise is fatally flawed. Nobody, no individual, no business, no body politic and certainly no economy, wants to use a means of exchange that can be manipulated by a single entity with anger management issues, an inconsistent approach to value, rigid and secretive centralized control, and a theoretical half-life of 534 years to be able to do anything about changing any of it.
Did you consider for a moment that creating an artificial spike might actually frighten businesses away? Did it occur to the brain trust behind SC that showing a business in such an obvious way that the value of your tokens can be manipulated with pocket change and that the underlying economy of your token is based on demand equal to the value of a clapped-out 1992 Chevy Impala with two flat tires in toto, might not be the best approach?
Didn't think so.
So have fun with your comp-sci class project. Revel in those fantasies that you will one day rule the world economy, and that supermodels will come knocking just to bask in the radiance of your Uncle Scrooge stash of ShortBusCoin.