Pages:
Author

Topic: [SOLVED] $20 in BTC for an algebra problem (Read 2448 times)

hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 1000
April 24, 2015, 08:17:48 PM
#36
Yes, TriggerX got an answer. Thanks everyone!
Contest closed.

TriggerX, money sent.
Would you mind posting the steps to the solution?

It took 30 minutes to figure it out and I don't want to type it all out again haha. If I have time I may post it here again.

As for the BTC, I have received it, thanks.
member
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
Yes, TriggerX got an answer. Thanks everyone!
Contest closed.

TriggerX, money sent.
Would you mind posting the steps to the solution?
full member
Activity: 266
Merit: 100
so triggerx already won this contest?
member
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
TriggerX did not request an escrow. I'm checking his solution at this moment. If it's good, I'll send the money.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
where is the fund being escrowed ? Show us the proof ?
legendary
Activity: 2087
Merit: 1015
wouldn't be unsolvable

May want to rephrase that a bit
full member
Activity: 266
Merit: 100
math make me crazy insane lol , goodluck to everyone .
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
I am not Math genius, but in high school we were told that if we had 5 variables and 4 equations for it, then it wouldn't be unsolvable . Wouldn't that be true for this case ?   
member
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
TriggerX, this looks extremely close! Still need to carefully check
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 1000
xi = 2L/mu
alpha = 1/(1+xi)(mu+L)
c = (s_k)/(2*xi*mu*m*alpha*alpha)
k=(1/[(s_k)/m-(1+1/xi)*c*alpha*alpha*2*L)] + (mu+L)/[2*alpha*mu*L]

Is this correct?
member
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
TriggerX,

Let u=1/100, L=2/100, s=1, m=2

Then xi = 6, c = 147/2000000, a = 100/21.

In that case the first three inequalities hold, but the last one doesn't.

BOUNTY STILL OPEN!!!!!

EDIT: I will pay $20 for EITHER a) or b) !!!! Will extend the deadline 24 hours from now.
member
Activity: 101
Merit: 10
the answer is n ^ n + b ^ = c n ^
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
you can use Mathematica to solve this problem, it's not hard.
legendary
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1094
Checking the solution!

Am I correct that you are suggesting the following?

k=1

alpha=(u + L)/2uL

e =4uL - 1

c=(sk/m - 1)/(1 + 1/(4uL - 1))*2u²L/(u + L)²

EDIT: I still need to check it, but I don't think it will work, since your first three lines contain a mistake...
1/k - 2alpha*u*L/(u + L) <=0;
1/k <= 2alpha*uL/(u + L);
k<=(u + L)/2alpha*uL

EDIT2: This solution does not work, since for u = 1, L =2, the second (original) equation does not hold.
(1+4*1*2-1)*(3)/(2*1*2) - 2/(1+2) = 5.3333... which is not <=0

I just checked and noticed I substituted a wrong value for alpha and so the result is incorrect. I can see that another memebr has tried solving the equation and if by chance his solution too is incorrect, I can try again.  Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 251
Im still confuse with math question, for this one, very difficult for me! Im usually can answer for aljabar question!
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 1000
I think I have the answer, can you escrow the funds? Also do you think you can extend the date a few more days?

Edit: Nevermind, I'll just post the answers. Only for part a)

alpha = (mu)/[(mu+L)(mu+3L)]
xi = 3L/u
c = (s_k)(u+L)(u+L)(u+3L)(u+3L)/3L
k = (1/[(s_k)/m-(1+1/xi)*c*alpha*alpha*2*L)] + (mu+L)/[2*alpha*mu*L]

If it is correct, please send the BTC to this address: 13MLwx49jT4a2SSwD17qu1uaG1sbGMdrzi
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Bro, you need to try http://dadice.com
Is the calculation for some purpose? Are you trying to let someone else donyou homework Wink? Or are just trying to have fun when people burn their brain juice away?
legendary
Activity: 2087
Merit: 1015
Don't know if you posted it yourself or not but these guys can't solve it. https://2ch.hk/cc/res/98420.html
member
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
Bounty still open!!
member
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
Checking the solution!

Am I correct that you are suggesting the following?

k=1

alpha=(u + L)/2uL

e =4uL - 1

c=(sk/m - 1)/(1 + 1/(4uL - 1))*2u²L/(u + L)²

EDIT: I still need to check it, but I don't think it will work, since your first three lines contain a mistake...
1/k - 2alpha*u*L/(u + L) <=0;
1/k <= 2alpha*uL/(u + L);
k<=(u + L)/2alpha*uL

EDIT2: This solution does not work, since for u = 1, L =2, the second (original) equation does not hold.
(1+4*1*2-1)*(3)/(2*1*2) - 2/(1+2) = 5.3333... which is not <=0
Pages:
Jump to: