Could also be they hit a rough patch and need the extra BTC AND if they have really not been back here for 5 1/2 years are more newbie them old user in terms of what is going on..
But, if you asked me to bet I would take changed hands.
NOT worthy of neg feedback YET.
-Dave
Topic: [solved] hZti changed hands or not? - page 2. (Read 482 times)
Therefore, I suggest to give him a negative trust to ensure that the account belongs to the real owner.
Negative trust will not affect those who want to participate in the discussions and will force him to prove ownership of the account.
No I won't give him negative feedback and I don't think anyone else should do that until we hear what he has to say.Negative trust will not affect those who want to participate in the discussions and will force him to prove ownership of the account.
What makes me even more suspicious was that he send me two messages and one of them was written in German language to prove something.
It looks desperate if you ask me, but my popcorns are ready for his replies.
did you send him a link to this thread, maybe he can come here and give a real explanation of what happened with him and this account?
No, I didn't reply to any of his messages, and I expect him to reply in public about this.... it could be much more fan 
I am sure he is well aware of this thread, but I will add the link on feedback for his profile just in case.
Therefore, I suggest to give him a negative trust to ensure that the account belongs to the real owner.
While his behavior is suspicious I think that would be an overkill, to give this user negative feedback right off the bat. Imho, its much better to do it the way dkbit98 did, to give him neutral feedback for starters and then give it some time before proceeding with the negative when more evidence is available. If he was asking for a loan in this situation, then I wouldn't think twice before tagging him. He always can prove account ownership by signing any of his previous used BTC addresses. there are a few of them here, by ninjastic.space
I was just in the middle of checking those when I saw your post and from what I can see, none of them were used in the last 7-8 years so somehow I doubt that he will be able to sign any of those even if that account never changed hands. 
He always can prove account ownership by signing any of his previous used BTC addresses. there are a few of them here, by ninjastic.space
For example address 1MXv1mGhhzYy22rFM8NWeYWSyYDnRnYRYL is used Archive (IDK why I can't quote this post). I don't know German, but it seems understandable to me that this was the address of this BTT account.
I would not say that all this is enough for a negative tag. These are all assumptions and estimates only. Even if he can't sign any of previously used addresses (maybe they're from the exchange), it's not enough for the red tag. Neutral is fine.
@dkbit98 did you send him a link to this thread, maybe he can come here and give a real explanation of what happened with him and this account?
Code:
1DDTHEqppJqwn6QbjGSyNu6jxqqS8SeD5P
1CFhZu8SMx94DDUGi38wLUGgX8UqBSfWQB
1MXv1mGhhzYy22rFM8NWeYWSyYDnRnYRYL
1kc2hQHohBw3gbvwXQpzZmytPhbyZGe6B
For example address 1MXv1mGhhzYy22rFM8NWeYWSyYDnRnYRYL is used Archive (IDK why I can't quote this post). I don't know German, but it seems understandable to me that this was the address of this BTT account.
Therefore, I suggest to give him a negative trust to ensure that the account belongs to the real owner.
Negative trust will not affect those who want to participate in the discussions and will force him to prove ownership of the account.
Negative trust will not affect those who want to participate in the discussions and will force him to prove ownership of the account.
I would not say that all this is enough for a negative tag. These are all assumptions and estimates only. Even if he can't sign any of previously used addresses (maybe they're from the exchange), it's not enough for the red tag. Neutral is fine.
@dkbit98 did you send him a link to this thread, maybe he can come here and give a real explanation of what happened with him and this account?
And it's only possible that a German speaking member also bought the account recently, so he can speak the language just like the original owner of the account.
But still being inactive for many years and then suddenly joining campaigns is already suspicious to me.
But still being inactive for many years and then suddenly joining campaigns is already suspicious to me.
This user did not even attempt to make any posts to verify the authenticity of his account and therefore it is difficult to say that he "suddenly returned to post in the forum."
In general, the fact that the account is from 2013 or from 2022 will not make a difference, and the most important is the writing style. Therefore, I suggest to give him a negative trust to ensure that the account belongs to the real owner.
Negative trust will not affect those who want to participate in the discussions and will force him to prove ownership of the account.
In general, the fact that the account is from 2013 or from 2022 will not make a difference, and the most important is the writing style. Therefore, I suggest to give him a negative trust to ensure that the account belongs to the real owner.
Negative trust will not affect those who want to participate in the discussions and will force him to prove ownership of the account.
What I think is that if an account is bought, the seller can give the buyer the private key and address to sign a message, but this would still remain the best way to know if hZti is the owner of the account. Be it bought or built.
What I just know is that he is not qualified to be in a campaign, I have noticed he applied in three signature campaigns like Chipmixer and Bestchange recently when there was no slot available. He does not have any merit in the last 120 days, even in the last few years he got no merit, the merit he has was the one given to all members when merit system was introduced.
What I can only say is that he should provide the evidence that he is the owner of the account by signing a message using bitcoin address. If proven, then you can change the neutral tag to another neutral tag indicating account just woke up. If he start having and maintaing integrity, then you can remove it.
What I just know is that he is not qualified to be in a campaign, I have noticed he applied in three signature campaigns like Chipmixer and Bestchange recently when there was no slot available. He does not have any merit in the last 120 days, even in the last few years he got no merit, the merit he has was the one given to all members when merit system was introduced.
What I can only say is that he should provide the evidence that he is the owner of the account by signing a message using bitcoin address. If proven, then you can change the neutral tag to another neutral tag indicating account just woke up. If he start having and maintaing integrity, then you can remove it.
Someone noticed that member hZti woke up recently after seven years of inactivity, and he jumped right back to signature campaigns.
His password and email address was changed recently, and looking at his post history I noticed he was natively speaking German language.
I suspected that this account changed hands and it was probably sold so I left neutral feedback on his profile, and than I received two PM's from him telling me that he already proved ownership to forum admin (i don't know how exactly).
He asked me to remove neutral feedback from his profile, and I am ready to do that if he can prove ownership of any address he used in bitcointalk forum before year 2022.
I usually don't share content of private messages, but I will make exception here, because one of them is written in German, and I would like to ask other members if this is correctly written or done by machine translation?
What do you think about this case?
PS
Help from German speaking members is appreaciated.
His password and email address was changed recently, and looking at his post history I noticed he was natively speaking German language.
I suspected that this account changed hands and it was probably sold so I left neutral feedback on his profile, and than I received two PM's from him telling me that he already proved ownership to forum admin (i don't know how exactly).
He asked me to remove neutral feedback from his profile, and I am ready to do that if he can prove ownership of any address he used in bitcointalk forum before year 2022.
I usually don't share content of private messages, but I will make exception here, because one of them is written in German, and I would like to ask other members if this is correctly written or done by machine translation?
Quote
Hallo,
hab grad gelesen, dass du auch Deutscher bist. Also nochmal auf deutsch: Ich bin der Eigentümer von dem Account und habe das auch dem admin ausreichend nachgewiesen. Falls du auf Computerbase oder Ähnliches unterwegs bist kann ich dir da gerne eine Nachricht zum Beweis schicken. Glaube aber eigentlich das es nicht notwendig sein sollte.
Und finde es eigentlich nicht verwerflich mich bei einer Signatur Kampagne anzumelden bevor ich hier wieder mehr poste.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
hab grad gelesen, dass du auch Deutscher bist. Also nochmal auf deutsch: Ich bin der Eigentümer von dem Account und habe das auch dem admin ausreichend nachgewiesen. Falls du auf Computerbase oder Ähnliches unterwegs bist kann ich dir da gerne eine Nachricht zum Beweis schicken. Glaube aber eigentlich das es nicht notwendig sein sollte.
Und finde es eigentlich nicht verwerflich mich bei einer Signatur Kampagne anzumelden bevor ich hier wieder mehr poste.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
What do you think about this case?
PS
Help from German speaking members is appreaciated.
Jump to: