Pages:
Author

Topic: [Solved] Pawn account reputation for a few dollar [1xbit participant] - page 2. (Read 400 times)

copper member
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1827
Top Crypto Casino
He hasn't yet worn signature advertising the scam, but when he does. I will leave negative feedback on his profile, but some members might probably tag him even for just applying.

Quite disappointed in his choice of attempting to advertise scam with such an old account

Members who trust him should know the kind of person they are trusting, so I will quote them here.

giammangiato's judgement is Trusted by:
1. bitbollo (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1078 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. fillippone (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (15) 7234 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Source: LoyceV's Trust list viewer.
Get your own Trust list in BBCode at loyce.club/trust.
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1228
Playgram - The Telegram Casino
You could've informed them via PM first rather than trying to loot merits here.
I'm probably not going to get you to merit me just because of this thread, nor am I going to bother telling DT to stay away from that scam site via PM as he'll know what the trust system function of each user profile.  Tongue
sr. member
Activity: 958
Merit: 265
You could've informed them via PM first rather than trying to loot merits here.
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1228
Playgram - The Telegram Casino
Since I haven't had 7 days active on this forum, message like this always appear above threads created by someone who has been accused of scam. Meanwhile, I have to get used to adapting after my login time reach 7 days and so do other users here.



The message above can be found in the campaign [open] Restart of 1xBit signature campaign - new signatures and more spots! where this campaign is sponsored by a site that has proven to be scamming many previous customers. However, this doesn't seem to deter some users from joining, especially those whose account reputation have been damaged because other scams.

But the different thing I can point out is that the hero members are with a good reputation this time. He started applying for this campaign only after the previous campaign was over and he started pawning his profile just to promote a scam site [not yet using signature & avatar] for a few $$.



Btctalk name: giammangiato
Btctalk URL: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/giammangiato-889300
Rank: Hero
Current post count: 898
BTC Address: bc1qyj0e35dmaxctx0sy4jk9r4pxstzf4n5fj7f7kk



I don't think he never knew about the site's bad reputation, he purposely applied for the campaign though in the end he could quibble that it was a mistake after I created this thread. What do you think about this?
Pages:
Jump to: