I'm actually gonna stop mining litecoins on the gpu's.
I would make around 138.484 LTC a day = 0.34759 BTC a day at the exchange. 0.34759 x 7 = 2.43313 BTC a week. When I mine bitcoins, I make 3.12 a week.
As stated this was a test and it isn't worth mining litecoins atm. And I have learned quite a bit by this experience. So it wasn't a waste.
Topic: [Solved]Reaper help request please.[Fulfilled .05 BTC bounty] - page 3. (Read 17326 times)
You also did try to turn the aggression up from 10 to 18 ?
I had it at 18 but pc is unusable at that number, I changed it to a little bit more moderate, 15. pc gets a little hiccups here and there once in a while, like opening certain stuff.
Ok, cool. Just wanted to help you get the best hashrate.
cheers
Yea, for sure.
What is odd is, I am using the intel hd graphics for my desktop, and don't use the two ati gpu's at all but for mining. And using 18 I would think, should have no effect on my desktop use at all. Find that odd?
My stales jumped up to 1.4%.
You also did try to turn the aggression up from 10 to 18 ?
I had it at 18 but pc is unusable at that number, I changed it to a little bit more moderate, 15. pc gets a little hiccups here and there once in a while, like opening certain stuff.
Ok, cool. Just wanted to help you get the best hashrate.
cheers
You also did try to turn the aggression up from 10 to 18 ?
I had it at 18 but pc is unusable at that number, I changed it to a little bit more moderate, 15. pc gets a little hiccups here and there once in a while, like opening certain stuff.
You also did try to turn the aggression up from 10 to 18 ?
Good. you are using the right cpu miner Stales look better then mine
I've got a 5870, 5770 and a 6850 mix rig running @ 644 Khash
Stales look better then mineI've got a 5870, 5770 and a 6850 mix rig running @ 644 Khash
Alrightttt! Very cool.
Good. you are using the right cpu miner Stales look better then mine
I've got a 5870, 5770 and a 6850 mix rig running @ 644 Khash
Stales look better then mineI've got a 5870, 5770 and a 6850 mix rig running @ 644 Khash
Ok, this is odd.
I set the work back to 256 & gpu_thread_concurrency to 6144. It looks to be good now. 0%. How does the stales look? They look alright?
I set the work back to 256 & gpu_thread_concurrency to 6144. It looks to be good now. 0%. How does the stales look? They look alright?
Code:
GPU 333.9kH/s, shares: 310|1, stale 0.3215%, GPU errors: 0%, ~324.559 kH/s, 63s
GPU 334.8kH/s, shares: 316|1, stale 0.3155%, GPU errors: 0%, ~326.656 kH/s, 64s
GPU 331.7kH/s, shares: 321|1, stale 0.3106%, GPU errors: 0%, ~324.655 kH/s, 65s
GPU 331.2kH/s, shares: 323|1, stale 0.3086%, GPU errors: 0%, ~323.708 kH/s, 66s
GPU 331.1kH/s, shares: 330|1, stale 0.3021%, GPU errors: 0%, ~324.746 kH/s, 67s
GPU 330.1kH/s, shares: 332|1, stale 0.3003%, GPU errors: 0%, ~320.934 kH/s, 68s
GPU 330.5kH/s, shares: 335|1, stale 0.2976%, GPU errors: 0%, ~320.082 kH/s, 69s
GPU 330.5kH/s, shares: 337|1, stale 0.2959%, GPU errors: 0%, ~318.318 kH/s, 70s
GPU 330.9kH/s, shares: 343|1, stale 0.2907%, GPU errors: 0%, ~318.45 kH/s, 71s
GPU 330.9kH/s, shares: 347|1, stale 0.2874%, GPU errors: 0%, ~317.668 kH/s, 72s
GPU 330.8kH/s, shares: 353|1, stale 0.2825%, GPU errors: 0%, ~318.702 kH/s, 73s
GPU 330.8kH/s, shares: 361|1, stale 0.2762%, GPU errors: 0%, ~321.481 kH/s, 74s
GPU 330.7kH/s, shares: 365|1, stale 0.2732%, GPU errors: 0%, ~319.816 kH/s, 75s
GPU 330.7kH/s, shares: 369|1, stale 0.2703%, GPU errors: 0%, ~319.057 kH/s, 76s
GPU 331.1kH/s, shares: 374|1, stale 0.2667%, GPU errors: 0%, ~319.169 kH/s, 77s
GPU 331.4kH/s, shares: 386|1, stale 0.2584%, GPU errors: 0%, ~321.043 kH/s, 79s
GPU 331.4kH/s, shares: 389|1, stale 0.2564%, GPU errors: 0%, ~320.307 kH/s, 80s
GPU 331.3kH/s, shares: 396|1, stale 0.2519%, GPU errors: 0%, ~321.207 kH/s, 81s
GPU 331.9kH/s, shares: 410|1, stale 0.2433%, GPU errors: 0%, ~317.657 kH/s, 85s
GPU 331.9kH/s, shares: 415|1, stale 0.2404%, GPU errors: 0%, ~317.011 kH/s, 86s
GPU 331.8kH/s, shares: 418|1, stale 0.2387%, GPU errors: 0%, ~316.381 kH/s, 87s
GPU 332.1kH/s, shares: 425|1, stale 0.2347%, GPU errors: 0%, ~317.999 kH/s, 88s
GPU 332.1kH/s, shares: 427|1, stale 0.2336%, GPU errors: 0%, ~315.162 kH/s, 89s
GPU 331.9kH/s, shares: 446|1, stale 0.2237%, GPU errors: 0%, ~314.996 kH/s, 93s
reduce gpu_thread_occurency ??
mine is at 5000
mine is at 5000
That at 5000, with worksize @ 64 I am receiving 4.00% now, jumping from 1% to 2 % then to 4%
try 4800 or even lower. Not going to hurt to play around.
also, if you are cpu mining on the other PC's, are you using reaper ? Cause there is better cpu mining sofware.
Nope, for cpu mining I am using Pooler miner and for the other cpu on another computer using pooler as well. I just configured my prifinity64 to set reaper to use use core 3 and Pooler set to 0,1 and 2 core and running pooler as 3 cores.
I put it work back to 128 and the gpu_thread_concurrency back 6144 , I receive around .2% to .3% error. which is ebtter than the .4% and much better than 4%.
And actually, when I used work set to 64 or 256 my hash rate was breaking from the original 333khash/s to 289 khash/s.
reduce gpu_thread_occurency ??
mine is at 5000
mine is at 5000
That at 5000, with worksize @ 64 I am receiving 4.00% now, jumping from 1% to 2 % then to 4%
try 4800 or even lower. Not going to hurt to play around.
also, if you are cpu mining on the other PC's, are you using reaper ? Cause there is better cpu mining sofware.
reduce gpu_thread_occurency ??
mine is at 5000
mine is at 5000
That at 5000, with worksize @ 64 I am receiving 4.00% now, jumping from 1% to 2 % then to 4%
reduce gpu_thread_occurency ??
mine is at 5000
mine is at 5000
It's climbing backup to .4%, I will give 256 a shot.
no, my GPU errors < 0.03 and falling
try lowering worksize to 64
try lowering worksize to 64
yup try this , never use 128 cause it break the hash rate (at least on my gpus) 64 or 256 is the way, also the gpu error go up with lower aggression i notice that.
Ok, cool. thanks.
no, my GPU errors < 0.03 and falling
try lowering worksize to 64
try lowering worksize to 64
Ok, thanks, I changed it to 64, and will give it a while so what ever needs to build up to show the result, I'll post back with results in like an hour or half an hour.
It looked to steadily climb upto .4% from 0% with previous setting "worksize 128" so we'll, see.
Thanks.
no, my GPU errors < 0.03 and falling
try lowering worksize to 64
try lowering worksize to 64
yup try this , never use 128 cause it break the hash rate (at least on my gpus) 64 or 256 is the way, also the gpu error go up with lower aggression i notice that.
no, my GPU errors < 0.03 and falling
try lowering worksize to 64
try lowering worksize to 64
Hey, how are your gpu errors look? Around .4%?
I noticed this as well. also about 17% lower power usage with higher memory clocks.
I see this as ocing even more of an opportunity.
I noticed this as well. also about 17% lower power usage with higher memory clocks.
Jump to: