Thank you mprep, for giving your REAL reasons for deleting my posts. I'm new and don't have much info to give. I like seeing pics and other people do to. How do you quantify the quality of a post? I bet you have some "low quality posts" too, but I'm the one being picked on. I guess it's your forum, your rules.
It's awfully convenient for you to say to stop posting the posts that were deleted by you and cluttering my own thread! I guess you don't want anyone else to qualify them.
I determine quality by several aspects: does it provide an opinion, info, etc., how generic it is, how on topic that is, how many similiar replies are there, what section of the forum that is. I take tips and suggestions from other moderators and theymos, the admin. Also, don't flatter or victimize yourself, I (and possibly anyone) have absolutely no reason to pick on a random newbie. I noticed your spammy response while going through my regular procedure and checked out your post history for possible spam. And I wasn't mistaken.
Posting all the deleted responses would be spam as well since a few examples are enough. If a person makes a thread and starts posting random chars or overall low quality responses, he'll get his posts deleted like any other member posting in that thread. And yes, me and most of us here had at least a few responses deleted - none of us are perfect. Some more (like you), some less. That's how moderation works.
+1 = I agree, yes, here here, hell yeah, etc.
What's wrong with offering support to what someone else posted by simply agreeing with them? Do you have to give a reason as well to qualify your post?
If these useless +1's and similiar responses were allowed, we'd be neck deep in thousands of pages containing these, overwheliming any worthwhile response that actually is interesting.