Topic: Some dude claims to have met Satoshi in 1993. - page 2. (Read 503 times)

Don't feed the troll. He obviously did it for the temporary noise.

LMAO! It was too harsh to spit that horseshit in front of Saylor.

What do you mean as a "honeypot project"? A honeypot is usually when you design an environment that is used by hackers, for their operator to study and analyze their behavior. For example, Cloudflare could be a honeypot, because it is extensively presented in every page nowadays, and could collaborate with the government to provide valuable information from cyber attacks.

I don't see how this analogy would apply to a decentralized currency that comes with privacy features, if desired. If it was created by the NSA, wouldn't they disable things like SIGHASH_ANYONECANPAY, that allow privacy techniques like coinjoin to be implemented?

In my opinion anyone may be right saying they met Satoshi Nakamoto, but may not actually know him as a brain behind bitcoin. because he or they chose to remain anonymous. Over the years most people have came up with some speculation that they knew who Satoshi is. some even claimed to be Satoshi Nakamoto, but all appears to be false, only to attract attention and recognition.

Do you think scottie was smart enough to met satoshi back then in 1993? Probably I'll say pippen is a weak guy whose wife left him and started dating Jordan's son, also refused the invitation by Kim jong Un from north korea while he had opportunity to visit there but later on rodman went N.K. I've seen twice, thrice post of him on Twitter claiming that satoshi came in his dream and told him that blah blah blah about bitcoin future, i don't remember but yeah he gave the actual date that bitcoin will reach ath or something (whatever happened/'ll/s that is only an imposter prophecy for the audience) and probably those dreams are day dreamed after a one cocaine snort.

Just like Joan9269 said all these really don't matter. besides those that actually know Satoshi would not want to come out publicly to announce it because of the negative things it packs. The truth is many people that fall for these kind of awkward news really don't understand the concept of bitcoin and how it works. The fact is Satoshi being called a pseudenonymous entity sends a certain information.

Though the internet isn't 100% certain about it, there are actually conspiracies that Satoshi isn't a single person and it all seems to make sense since bitcoin seems too complex for a single person to create alone. It's possible Satoshi was simply a group with "Satoshi" as the head.

So, there's more to this story of Scottie Pippen. He has tweeted some good prediction that did happened although on the exact date but with the price that he has mentioned. Now, he has met Satoshi in 1993? only him can tell the truth, maybe true, maybe for the sake of attention.

And so the curiosity drives on, 😏 the cases of people claiming to have met or known Satoshi is now something of a mere joke as so many people just wants to feed up that curiosity.  Although both Micheal Saylor and others are not some kind of expert when it comes to this issue but the fact that what the guy is saying is full of crabs just makes people's opinion of him stand, I mean how would you even say that Satoshi comes to you sometimes in the dream.😅 Am very certain this isn't the last person who would claim to see or even claim to be Satoshi himself and all these claims lack hard evidence to back it up.

Baloney.

Folks, the only theory that makes sense so far is that "Satoshi" was an worker, or group of wokers at the CIA or NSA.

That's the only thing that can explain the fact that "Satoshi" continues to sit on $200B in Bitcoin without selling it.

The only other explanation is that he died suddenly and in a way that absolutely nobody knew what he did or who he was. But this is extremely unlikely: dying suddenly like that is statistically very unlikely, and it's even more unlikely that there would be nobody around him who could at least have a guess that he might be Satoshi.

Now imagine you are the worker at the CIA/NSA who decided, one day, to create Bitcoin as a honeypot project. Both of these agencies have plenty of personnel on the payroll who could do it, and somebody working there would probably have no problem convincing their boss they be allowed to work on this project because presumably it would have upsides for the agency.

Now imagine that worker started Bitcoin, and then in grew... and grew... and grew...

Now what do you do? First of all, you can't sell your Bitcoin (it's not "yours", it belongs to the US government... sorta). And selling it would absolutely expose you and the secret project since and lump of money like that would need to be reported to Congress (even a small amount money, like a few million way back when, would need to be reported and would compromise the secret).

So you keep the Bitcoin, you disappear your public avatar, and make like the project never existed, keeping the project as one of the country's deepest-held secrets.

That's the only theory I've ever seen that explains everything we know about Satoshi--besides the one that I think is very unlikely.

Scottie: I met Satoshi in my dream as well as in 1993...

Moderator: you seem to have a good relationship with Satoshi (sacarsm)

Scottie: (Not realizing the sacarsm) "I feel like I DO"
how hilarious that is ... Especially since it's coming from the same guy that claimed to be greater than MJ.

---

..and yet again, just after craig has been silenced for a while, another impersonator is out... This time, they ain't claiming to be Satoshi himself (like others do) bahahahahaha!!!!
This is clearly just another wannabe Satoshi story teller. Let's see how far he goes with this claims

Obviously, we all know everyone that was part of Bitcoin's creation right from onset,and it's quite understandable that some of them are yet to be noticed or mentioned.I see that all these claims are just to distract people and put them in a state of bewilderment.He seems very serious about what he's doing and saying;but let's see how far he can go with this.

The questions you raised are the questions. I always want to raise when I see posts like this. One thing I can't understand is why Satoshi is being commented on so much or has even met him but no one has been able to find any explanation for this. Everything happened just through such discussions. It's nothing more than creating tension between others or us.

And I think it's impossible to find Satoshi. If it was possible, then all these years wouldn't have passed like this. He could have been found inside. But since he couldn't be found, it can be said that he can't be found anymore.

Really Scottie Pippen of the Chicago Bulls dynasty?

I would agree if he says that he met, Black Jesus, -> Michael Jordan, hehehe.

But saying that he met Satoshi when it was not even in the development stage? That's crazy? I guess he really has to say something, as he had his book sitting, in the shelf, Unguarded Hardcover.

That look says it all lmao. He's already done with that talk especially the last seconds of the clip lmao.

---

Any claim without any proof is considered an obvious fake. I wonder if the host/mod ask any proof from him from that talk lmao.

1993?

Thats 16 years before Bitcoin was released into the wild, Satoshi probably didnt
even start working on it at that stage.

OK the guy claims to have met Satoshi in 1993, it doesnt change anything and I
dont know how he  can associate some guy back in 1993 to Satoshi, maybe he met
some other guy working on a "digital money" project that never made it...

Anyway for me its another meh moment.

Honestly it’s hard and almost impossible to believe someone who makes claims like meeting Satoshi back in 1993. especially when no one even heard of Bitcoin until the 2009.
These types of statements without any proof, make it look like he is just trying to grab attention or possibly pull off some sort of scam. For me, when people put out unverifiable claims like this because it raises lots of red flags. If he can’t provide solid evidence then it’s probably just another conspiracy. I would stay cautious and only trust what can be proven.

Chad Saylor merely being a chad, and knowing a lie when the lie is being told. Tin-foil hate conspiracy theory, he is being blackmailed/paid by some nefarious entities/state-level actors to tell some lies, get everyone's attention, to divide and/or to disrupt the community. Because why is he doing this? Everyone knows, and Scottie Pippen himself knows that everyone knows, that it's a mere lie.

 🤔

As I don't want to give importance to the tweet quoted link by you, I am deleting the link. I am sure this individual will be someone who would like to get more influence and become like faketoshi in a new way. There is a limit to such shots but the genaration now is looking to do anything to get famous.

I won't be surprised that this tweet might help him gain some more followers. In the end this guy will lose them when someone from this forum or a Bitcoin loyalist question him and his integrity. The time has come when such fake propoganda accounts like this one are taken down by X.

So what if he met Satoshi in 1993? Will he reveal his identity? Will he say that he was actually involved in the creation of bitcoin? People these days would make up lies just to chase some clout and unsurprisingly many foolish people would believe it and now give him attention.

It’s just better to ignore people like this. It’s like they are just seeking out attention because they are no longer relevant. Though, I am curious to see how he plans on making money through this because I am sure this lie will end up with him capitalizing on it.

Even without the rugpull, the way he's come out and said it already means he shouldn't be taken seriously.

And of course he rugpulled his fans. Almost anyone who's done a sports NFT has. Any "tokenised" "real world" sale that tanks 95% after launch has to be a scam. But you know, he can always claim it was his advisors, like all the other athletes. Like the guy, but can't say for sure that anything any athlete "says" online is what actually is.

Another Joseph maybe?

 Here's another one where he claimed Satoshi revealed Bitcoin price to him. Although the article is about two months old, it still tells us a thing or two about the guy and I'm not surprised that this sorta thing is happening. He's an ex professional basketball player and when you no longer ball, you'd have to find a way to remain relevant in the social space so aside from him delving into NFTs that didn't favor him and switching to creating his own meme coin that still didn't have promise, I think the next best thing was to use to popular phrase "I've met Satoshi". Only, this one sounds a little delulu when he stated he was told the price at which Bitcoin would be on Nov 5, by Satoshi himself in a dream.

What I don't understand, OP... if you don't want to make firewood out of a fallen tree, well,  'just let it burn then... alone^byfM

(Periódico de ayer=old news=outdated news)
Man, I saw this news and I didn't even pay attention to it, even though I knew the guy in question, who... isn't just any person, at least in the aspect of being an even-tempered citizen and, to this day, only linked to the NBA and being nothing more and nothing less than the playmate of the best basketball player of all time, Michael Jordan.


Man, here CW has nothing to do and even less to say that every person is free to say what they want, it is not like that, at least not if you are an influential person and with the reputation of having been a person with credibility in some activity.

Here they always name MS but it is worth asking who the hell knows MS outside the niche area of ​​bitcoin, because even people linked to bitcoin do not know him...

In the case that concerns us, it would be very strange that a sports fanatic and especially of the NBA does not know this guy, in fact he is someone who is surely better known to his community than SN...

So it is worth asking the true background of this... is it not rather that MS is involved with this supposed idea in the voice of a new ambassador of microestrategy