care to share numbers? More heat is better for the upcoming winter 
, but afterwards such info could be useful.
, but afterwards such info could be useful.What numbers ? lol
-_-
like Memfreq before and after and heat before and after + Megahashes before and after! I certainly didn't mean how many ripe apples on a plastic tangerine tree on mars
LOL.. but I like farming on Mars. xD
I did the best I could with my temp guesstimates and tbh, I didn't notice if the mhash/s were affected. If it did, the +/- would have been minimal. I've gone as low as 600mhz on the memory but keep it at 750 because anything lower makes the system a little unstable when watching vids/ surfing the web.
As I said in that thread, the gpu and vrm temps dropped a minimum of 5-7C. The mobo/chipset is also down 3-5C.
I'm using Guiminer with the following flags.. -v -w128 -f70
That whole thread is full of fail. They can't fathom GPGPU computing at all. OP is the only one with a coherent statement. It's likely a bunch of 14 year old Call Of Duty zitfaces. They would be completely [headexploded] by the thought of underclocking and undervolting a card to maximize it's energy efficiency per work, and aren't going to understand W ∝ V^2.
MSI: "tech support is a cost center, we'll just let dumbasses talk to each other in a forum so they don't call us".
The answer is no, you aren't going to damage your card, in fact you may extend it's life by reducing electromigration. There will just be underclocks and undervoltages where the card is no longer stable.
MSI: "tech support is a cost center, we'll just let dumbasses talk to each other in a forum so they don't call us".
The answer is no, you aren't going to damage your card, in fact you may extend it's life by reducing electromigration. There will just be underclocks and undervoltages where the card is no longer stable.
I called tech support to complain and they didn't seem to care. At the start of the conversation I was told that the forum is run by some dudes at HQ and that the forum is 'unofficial'.
