Pages:
Author

Topic: Someone just sent 26 BTC to genesis block address - page 2. (Read 976 times)

hero member
Activity: 2688
Merit: 588
I remember earlier times of the forum when some Bitcoin haters do that. They thought they can kill Bitcoin by burning coins. Grin
Burning Bitcoin wasn't very costly back then, given the prices of the time. However, it's not wise to make this move now. It's very likely that it was an erroneous transaction.
If Bitcoin haters still has plans to do this right now I think they are just killing themselves and just making value to every Bitcoin hodlers wallet. 😅 Good backfire actually.

Maybe that was just a birthday gift from someone for reaching another level of survival of Bitcoin. That gift benefits us all who hodl Bitcoin.

They need a lot of money to do that and if they just throw that money then they are only hurting their selves financially since no people would buy what they are doing. IF they could just sell that on exchange and cash out for sure there's a lot things to use that. But if they really intentionally do that then they must be totally crazy for thinking that they can influence people for doing the same action just what they did.

But anyways I'm still doubting if the owner do that intentionally and I maybe believe that that is mistakenly sent since no insane people will burn his $1m" worth of money just because they don't like to have it.
If they can throw away money just like that, it can mean that they are filthy rich and they won't ever struggle financially. But if ever it was a mistake, it is painful, as the amount is not just big but its pretty huge. That was $1m dollars we are talking about here.

As a normal BTC investor, they are also planning to sell their coins on the exchanges once they think they are profiting already but too bad it won't ever happen. Sad. If it's intentional, only crazy people will indeed follow the same action. What will they get when they do that anyway? LoL  Cheesy. We can only wish it came to the poor BTC users and they can use the money wisely, but they can be kind enough to return it to their rightful owners.
hero member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 558
dont be greedy
To be honest, I really don't know what to think about this transaction, at this point I think that it's better if this person did it on purpose because at least it means that they knew exactly what they were doing. If it's been a mistake, wow, I really don't know what I would do at this point, maybe this guy has a ton of bitcoins anyway, who knows...
Of course, only people with a significant amount of Bitcoin would consciously donate 26 BTC. Someone with a low savings balance would unlikely consciously do such a thing. An equivalent of 1 million dollars is indeed valuable for many, but those in control of substantial wealth may not consider it a big deal as long as they can generate more.

This transaction has already occurred, and we all haven't felt anything special or significant change; we're just amazed by the amount because it's substantial to us. I think speculating on that person's decision is starting to become pointless.
legendary
Activity: 4424
Merit: 4794

Your source. If you read the posts above it, you will see okx is the exchange not binance. All according to the sources though.

lets use an explorer and follow the taint (backward audit)

block 0 satoshi address
1A1zP1eP5QGefi2DMPTfTL5SLmv7DivfNa
received received 26btc from:
bc1q9z82prqdknpv4ku3haargeu7c0h67yrpree6v2
received 39btc from:
bc1qlccksaaehjkdv4tgf032pvx8n76uhazqt4rgy70y4drmqwh5espqwx89f9
received 39btc(~19.5+~19.5) from:
binance4 ~19.5btc
binance4 ~19.5btc

so its binance not OKX..
(though blockchain.info tagging of addresses could be wrong)
(though bitcoinrichlist tagging of addresses could be wrong)
copper member
Activity: 1330
Merit: 899
🖤😏

Your source. If you read the posts above it, you will see okx is the exchange not binance. All according to the sources though.
sr. member
Activity: 1666
Merit: 310
Up thread it's noted that the source of the funds has heavy BRC-20 activity and I've been told that Ayre has been significantly funding BRC-20 activity.
Source?

Since you've been a reputable BTC developer, I'll take your post seriously, especially considering the fact BSVers/big blockers consistently deny there's a conspiracy going on for almost 3 months to clog the BTC blockchain and render it useless for e-cash/p2p transactions.

Sorry HmmMAA, but no free market economics/laws/logic can explain WHY would someone burn 26 BTC! Either it's pure stupidity (highly unlikely) or something more sinister is going on behind the scenes.

Also, since the transaction was made from Binance, isn't it possible to verify the identity via KYC? Or am I missing something?
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 1
To be honest, I really don't know what to think about this transaction, at this point I think that it's better if this person did it on purpose because at least it means that they knew exactly what they were doing. If it's been a mistake, wow, I really don't know what I would do at this point, maybe this guy has a ton of bitcoins anyway, who knows...

see the Chart of BTC address where did the 27 BTC come from.
first transaction 13 december 2023.

https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/addresses/btc/bc1qlccksaaehjkdv4tgf032pvx8n76uhazqt4rgy70y4drmqwh5espqwx89f9
hero member
Activity: 1260
Merit: 765
Top Crypto Casino
Edit

The same thing came to my mind. They could have just anonymously donated the coins to some charity than to render them useless. They might have their reason but there has no obvious effect on burning coins as such.
If it's through a mistake it's a very heavy one, and if it's intentional, it's a foolish one. Burning isn't going to help any miners or even the large holders in botthe h short and long term. There are losses every year due to loss and deaths and the supply would keep on decreasing even though you are not wasting 20BTC at once.
That the extent of the hate against human freedom,  the act is perceived to them as being an anti-Bitcoin move,  and with that in mind they failed in every other sense of reasoning to charity or humanity was not in their thought,  just as in the thought of Satoshi who left Bitcoin to flow on it own without interferences,  well maybe they are among the early whales who bought loads of says at an incentive or a giveaway airdrop manner.

Or even hackers who are looking for where to throw away the Bitcoin without any trace,  but in reality this act is anti-social.
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 2880
Catalog Websites
To be honest, I really don't know what to think about this transaction, at this point I think that it's better if this person did it on purpose because at least it means that they knew exactly what they were doing. If it's been a mistake, wow, I really don't know what I would do at this point, maybe this guy has a ton of bitcoins anyway, who knows...
sr. member
Activity: 952
Merit: 303
26BTC is big amount in todays scenario where the value of 1BTC is above 40k USD. The transaction does not look like it was sent to the Genesis block in error. It looks to me that it was sent deliberately, the person who did this transaction I am assuming would be someone who will have a large stash of Bitcoin. Most probably an early adopter who might have done this transaction. But, why would someone do it that is the question in my mind.

        -   You know, to be honest, that makes me think a little bit, because in this day and age, if you are the one holding that amount, it will not be simply released or released. If it is different from us here, who aspire to hold at least 1 bitcoin when the arrival of the bull run is fine with them, if their target sell is 100k$ per bitcoin, that's 26 btc.

Could it be that the person who did that is not really the original owner of that address? Is it possible that a hacker did it? I'm just asking because if the original owner is still holding that address, even if we say that there is an emergency purpose that happened in his personal life, he will not do it for sure to release such a large amount. In fact, what do you think?
legendary
Activity: 2478
Merit: 1360
Don't let others control your BTC -> self custody
I like the CSW angle in this. I think it's the best explanation in this thread and if it's real (which I think it is) I hope it was either his mistake, or he used that address somewhere and got money sent to it.
Thank you for your donation, Craig. You're a sick mofo, but keep it going. Your loss is our gain.

Imagine the look on his face when he gets an email from some company saying -we've sent money to one of the addresses you provided when you made an account with us. Then he checks the address and his face gets more and more pale as he realizes where the money went Cheesy
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 691
In ₿ we trust
It was probably a wrong transaction, very sad for the person who lost their bitcoins in this way, it must be desperate.

It's always a good idea to check the address correctly, or send a small amount beforehand to make sure everything goes well.
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 3061
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
This could possibly have some connection to my involuntary hobby-horse.

what if i told you ayres knows CSW is not satoshi, but wants to keep the rouse alive because he had invested so much into CSW in earlier years where they done a deal demanding all story licencing rights (book and movie deal) when media production/producers come calling and asking for rights to make movies about CSW drama

ayres only wants to keep the rouse alive because he is still hoping big movie producers will make a phone call one day offering a large cheque for the real CSW story


There's more at stake than a potential and hypothetical movie deal. There's not much money to be made in a biopic about satoshi. Even authors of hit books are lucky if they get a million or so advance for their work and they already have source material which has a fanbase. Craig doesn't have anything yet and anyone could write a book about this and then sell the rights to it. All craig could give is exclusive access or make it 'official' but you don't need his permission. Calvin is just hoping Craig can con the courts into giving him ownership of bitcoin and the fortune of the early lost coins along with patents on blockchain technology etc. I don't know why he hasn't given up yet but maybe he's in too deep now and might as well see it out till the end. Like most BSV-ers I doubt he actually still believes he is satoshi even if he did at the start, but just has a financial incentive now. I think most BSV-ers are just greedy fools who think this is their opportunity to invest in "bitcoin" at sub £100 prices so they continue the charade in the hope of getting rich.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 560
Crypto Casino and Sportsbook

generated via imgflip


I remember earlier times of the forum when some Bitcoin haters do that. They thought they can kill Bitcoin by burning coins. Grin
Burning Bitcoin wasn't very costly back then, given the prices of the time. However, it's not wise to make this move now. It's very likely that it was an erroneous transaction.
Hahaha
Why don't them haters make same move? ( laughs)
I guess BTC is too risky for them to burn
The funny thing is that burning Bitcoins even makes it more scarce and less amount in circulation makes the value higher and more stable .
Besides that was Satoshi's point of the halving protocol ( to reduce inflation and promote the Bitcoin value.)
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1069
Someone, please wake me up,  26 bitcoins are quite a fortune to be burned just like that,  considering the current value of Bitcoin,  I suspect this could be an error transaction.

But if it is intentional,  I will say this should be the most ridiculous thing I had this year so far,  but the world needs that money instead of throwing it away forever,  we have so much hunger in the world and humans need money to buy basic needs why burn the money no matter what the state of your wealth.

The same thing came to my mind. They could have just anonymously donated the coins to some charity than to render them useless. They might have their reason but there has no obvious effect on burning coins as such.
If it's through a mistake it's a very heavy one, and if it's intentional, it's a foolish one. Burning isn't going to help any miners or even the large holders in both short and long term. There are losses every year due to loss and deaths and the supply would keep on decreasing even though you are not wasting 20BTC at once.
hero member
Activity: 2940
Merit: 715
Someone, please wake me up,  26 bitcoins are quite a fortune to be burned just like that,  considering the current value of Bitcoin,  I suspect this could be an error transaction.

But if it is intentional,  I will say this should be the most ridiculous thing I had this year so far,  but the world needs that money instead of throwing it away forever,  we have so much hunger in the world and humans need money to buy basic needs why burn the money no matter what the state of your wealth.
Any hard-earned bitcoin or money is never meant to be burned, regardless of how much its value as long as the owner works hard for it, then it’s odd to consider burning bitcoin, unless if the transaction made becomes an erroneous one. And I’d say this is obviously not intentional either, 26 btc is certainly huge, no one would dare simply throwing it away without valid purpose.

Burning bitcoin in the past might not be an issue since the value is still absolutely low, but hey with its current value, anyone would be throwing even 1 btc is not on his proper thinking, except if the transaction goes wrong, then it’s hard to retrieve it again.
legendary
Activity: 4326
Merit: 8950
'The right to privacy matters'
legendary
Activity: 3948
Merit: 3191
Leave no FUD unchallenged
Wouldn't it be funny if Ayre paid Satoshi's address as part of an effort to force Wright to use it?

I genuinely hope this turns out to be true.  It would likely signify the end of their cooperation and a tremendously weakened and fiscally-hobbled Faketoshi going forward.  Because clearly there is absolutely no way in hell he's accessing the BTC in that address.

Fingers crossed.  Although, given that several block explorers seem to suggest the funds are from an exchange, odds seem slim.  Ayre using a SegWit address seems comical to me, somehow.  Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 6403
Blackjack.fun

It's an exchange, seriously stop the witch hunt!

That address history
https://bitinfocharts.com/bitcoin/address/1A1zP1eP5QGefi2DMPTfTL5SLmv7DivfNa
Almost 100 BTC burned in this address that is a big donation to everyone.

It more like 50 BTC bitinfocharts shows the full balance, including the 50 unspendable BTC Satoshi generated.
But since you can can also say that he burned himself those by mistake, yeah one might count them too.

Based on the source, the screenshot from @Eljaboom on the X platform was made from the Binance exchange address
https://twitter.com/Eljaboom/status/1743505392787730899

Some say it's okx.
https://bitinfocharts.com/bitcoin/address/bc1qlccksaaehjkdv4tgf032pvx8n76uhazqt4rgy70y4drmqwh5espqwx89f9
legendary
Activity: 3234
Merit: 5637
Blackjack.fun-Free Raffle-Join&Win $50🎲
~snip~
Joke aside, I seriously doubts that's a mistake and whoever did it probably has an ulterior motive for doing it, rather than just burning 26 BTC.


What @gmaxwell wrote in his post makes sense, because it is not only CW Faketoshi who has already become a pathological liar, but all his sponsors are also infected with these lies. But when you are powerful enough and have a lot of money, you can claim whatever you want, especially that you are Satoshi Nakamoto, who cannot or does not want to defend himself against it.

However, I wouldn't completely rule out the possibility that someone who has a lot of Bitcoin because they bought it cheap or even mined it in the early days just wants their five minutes of fame.
Pages:
Jump to: