You can do all your analysis and make the right bets, yet even now, it's not the house edge working against you, but the player. Those who bet on Magnus Carlsen to win the World Rapid and Blitz Chess Championships in New York must be very upset because the player decided to quit for the most unbelievable reason. No one saw this coming not even me.
World chess great Magnus Carlsen has quit a major tournament after being told he could not participate while wearing jeans.
The Norwegian was defending his World Rapid and Blitz Chess Championships in New York on Friday when governing body FIDE made the request.
He said he offered to change his trousers for the following day before being fined and told he needed to change straight away.
Did any of bet on Magnus Carlsen to win? And what do you think about the whole situation that happened?
The news article was published on
Daily MailI think that
nitpicking jeans and disagreements between participants and tournament organizers happen extremely rarely. I would even say that this is an isolated case.
On the other hand, shouldn't the casino (or bookmaker) return the bets placed on Magnus Carlsen to the gamblers? What happened is a kind of force majeure circumstance, to which the gamblers have nothing to do, and therefore should not bear the burden of responsibility in the form of losing the bet.
Yes, Magnus Carlsen will probably not become a winner now, but this did not happen as part of his participation in the tournament, but because of a conflict with the organizers.