Join me as we take an honest look at the OP's claim in an attempt decipher whether it (the claim) stands up to the scrutiny of rationality.
Lets begin by examining a definition:Definition: Volume (finance)In capital markets, volume, or trading volume, is the amount (total number) of a security (or a given set of securities, or an entire market) that were traded during a given period of time. In the context of a single stock trading on a stock exchange, the volume is commonly reported as the number of shares that changed hands during a given day.
#1. Logical Fallacy, Appeal to Ignorance,
http://examples.yourdictionary.com/examples-of-ignorance-fallacy.html [A fallacy is a mistake in belief based on an unsound argument; so, an ignorance fallacy occurs when a person mistakenly believes something to be true that is not, because he or she does not know enough about the subject to know otherwise.]In our dissection of this post, we must first observe that the OP postulates the idiolocical supposition that it is abnormal or otherwise a
'scam' for a coin to obtain more 'volume' (daily trades) during a bull run; ergo, that a coin appreciating in price (or lowering, for that matter) would garnish more active traders wanting to buy or sell, and that this would be somehow 'malicious' and the coin should, for some reason, not change in value.
This supposition is either completely based on ignorance, or as others have noted, a rather dubious attempt to spread uncertainly & doubt. The OP (who apparently is suffering in his grasp of grade school English) further postulates that the 'true value' of the coin is $7.25; in so doing, spuriously displaying his ignorance of market factors such as supply & demand, productivity, real market or commerical usage, and of course speculative accumulation; all real-world market motivators that would drive the price of a product or security (or coin).
Fact: Coins with more volume are more actively traded (thus the above definition of the term 'volume'), and regularly garnish a higher appreciative or speculative market value.
Example: See
http://alt19.com [no affiliation, just has some pretty graphs] for a list of altcoin price inflation correlating with higher trading volumes. Why on earth would it be an oddity or malicious for a coin with rising price to be more actively traded? Answer: It isn't, thus, this post is little but thinly veiled sophistry, as we can now see that indeed the majority of other coins on the market correlate a higher price with an increased volume.
#2. Logical Fallacy, Circular logic or reasoning; Circulus in demonstrando; https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/66/Circular-ReasoningDescription: A type of reasoning in which the proposition is supported by the premises, which is supported by the proposition, creating a circle in reasoning where no useful information is being shared. This fallacy is often quite humorous.Consequently, towards the now (thankfully) end of the OP's debunked rant, he concludes "how many coins with fast transactions" (I'm assuming he is attempting to put forth the aphorism that other coins are also fast, so 'why aren't they also valuable?'). Not only does this portray a fundamental lack of economic erudition, yet seems to be a rather spurious attempt to shill in favor of another coin, syscoin. [See, Supra, for basic economic triggers].
As should now be pointedly obvious to anyone, he has deduced 'syscoin' to be the prime candidate for the apex of market achievement, based on his prior fallacious reasoning that 'high volume is a scam', as is his assumption that speed is "criterion for choice investment" (I'm shaking my head, as you should be, at not only poor the English, but blatant spam).
Conclusion: The OP should invest in an education, not crytocurrency.
