Pages:
Author

Topic: Spam Terracoin? - page 2. (Read 7039 times)

hero member
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
April 13, 2013, 12:24:54 PM
#85

DO NOT WORRY IF YOU ARE ON A NODES BANNED LIST...AND PLEASE STOP PUBLISHING NODE BANNED LISTS


Unless you are having problems connecting to the network, and are being blocked by multiple nodes, it is nothing to worry about.

Just make sure you are using the latest client. TRC is having enough issues without starting another completely unnecessary fire.


To avoid such confusions the devs might want to publish chain forking changes a little bit earlier (less than a day, seriously?) and/or broadcast a message like Bitcoin devs did when their chain forked.

Apparently they are even quite a lot of miners on a previous fork (so that makes it at least 3 simultaneous TRC chains) on P2Pool as MaGNet's previous post shows.
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002
Waves | 3PHMaGNeTJfqFfD4xuctgKdoxLX188QM8na
April 13, 2013, 12:24:10 PM
#84
But what does it mean now my IP is on that "ban list"?

Can I still mine Terracoin from my home-IP?
Can I still transfer Terracoin from my home-IP?
How do I get off that list?

edit: Back to Litecoin mining. PM me when you fix this.
It means nothing.

It means a lot since Terracoin is legit hard-forked on block 104290. Banscore 100 is absolutely rare in normal occassions. For example, double spend attempt
(sending tx which constains already spent outputs) will earn you banscore of just 10.

@ MaGNeT

Reset your IP than start wallet again. When in miner, check what difficulty it shows, write it down, wait the next block then compare difficulty you
wrote down with one shown on Terracoin explorer. If they are same, you are fine.

Reset my IP? How do you mean? I have this IP for 4 years now and can't be changed.
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002
Waves | 3PHMaGNeTJfqFfD4xuctgKdoxLX188QM8na
April 13, 2013, 12:22:15 PM
#83
All IPs listed above were submitting or relaying invalid blocks, which is very bad thing so banscore went from 0 -> 100 immidiately. Listed IPs are of
those who use older wallet versions, so not neccessarily an attacker but I've listed them anyway. From my perspective, there is not so much difference
between ignoring mandatory updates and intentionaly attacking the network.

I am in this list. I compiled the client from git master's head less than 24h ago. What nonsense is this? The chain is forked by the devs at a whim?

Just did a git pull, saw one commit, git diff HEAD^ shows ugly hacks testing a minimum block that was already reached.

The commit was published less than 24h before it was needed to remain on the main chain, that's quite brutal. I wonder if all exchanges are on the right chain and how they will react if they aren't...

These are my statistics from P2Pool.
Why are there 104.xxx and 100.xxx blocks? Or isn't that the blockchain?



hero member
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
April 13, 2013, 12:19:49 PM
#82
All IPs listed above were submitting or relaying invalid blocks, which is very bad thing so banscore went from 0 -> 100 immidiately. Listed IPs are of
those who use older wallet versions, so not neccessarily an attacker but I've listed them anyway. From my perspective, there is not so much difference
between ignoring mandatory updates and intentionaly attacking the network.

I am in this list. I compiled the client from git master's head less than 24h ago. What nonsense is this? The chain is forked by the devs at a whim?

Just did a git pull, saw one commit, git diff HEAD^ shows ugly hacks testing a minimum block that was already reached.

The commit was published less than 24h before it was needed to remain on the main chain, that's quite brutal. I wonder if all exchanges are on the right chain and how they will react if they aren't...
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
April 13, 2013, 12:19:23 PM
#81
All IPs listed above were submitting or relaying invalid blocks, which is very bad thing so banscore went from 0 -> 100 immidiately. Listed IPs are of
those who use older wallet versions, so not neccessarily an attacker but I've listed them anyway. From my perspective, there is not so much difference
between ignoring mandatory updates and intentionaly attacking the network.

I am in this list. I compiled the client from git master's head less than 24h ago. What nonsense is this? The chain is forked by the devs at a whim?

Same for me. As soon as I saw the new client and before I started mining at P2Pool, I updated my client to terracoin-0.1.3-33-win32.
I only setup my P2Pool 7-8 hours ago because multipool.in was giving me trouble again and I wanted to mine TRC.

I'm looking around but can't find any newer, so I don't think the problem is at my side.
But I still get banned.


DO NOT WORRY IF YOU ARE ON A NODES BANNED LIST...AND PLEASE STOP PUBLISHING NODE BANNED LISTS


Publish away!!!!

Unless you are having problems connecting to the network, and are being blocked by multiple nodes, it is nothing to worry about.

Just make sure you are using the latest client. TRC is having enough issues without starting another completely unnecessary fire.

full member
Activity: 148
Merit: 100
April 13, 2013, 12:15:41 PM
#80
All IPs listed above were submitting or relaying invalid blocks, which is very bad thing so banscore went from 0 -> 100 immidiately. Listed IPs are of
those who use older wallet versions, so not neccessarily an attacker but I've listed them anyway. From my perspective, there is not so much difference
between ignoring mandatory updates and intentionaly attacking the network.

I am in this list. I compiled the client from git master's head less than 24h ago. What nonsense is this? The chain is forked by the devs at a whim?

Same for me. As soon as I saw the new client and before I started mining at P2Pool, I updated my client to terracoin-0.1.3-33-win32.
I only setup my P2Pool 7-8 hours ago because multipool.in was giving me trouble again and I wanted to mine TRC.

I'm looking around but can't find any newer, so I don't think the problem is at my side.
But I still get banned.

it may work the other way too : you're getting banned by remote nodes still using an older client ?
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002
Waves | 3PHMaGNeTJfqFfD4xuctgKdoxLX188QM8na
April 13, 2013, 12:13:09 PM
#79
All IPs listed above were submitting or relaying invalid blocks, which is very bad thing so banscore went from 0 -> 100 immidiately. Listed IPs are of
those who use older wallet versions, so not neccessarily an attacker but I've listed them anyway. From my perspective, there is not so much difference
between ignoring mandatory updates and intentionaly attacking the network.

I am in this list. I compiled the client from git master's head less than 24h ago. What nonsense is this? The chain is forked by the devs at a whim?

Same for me. As soon as I saw the new client and before I started mining at P2Pool, I updated my client to terracoin-0.1.3-33-win32.
I only setup my P2Pool 7-8 hours ago because multipool.in was giving me trouble again and I wanted to mine TRC.

I'm looking around but can't find any newer, so I don't think the problem is at my side.
But I still get banned.
hero member
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
April 13, 2013, 12:11:49 PM
#78
All IPs listed above were submitting or relaying invalid blocks, which is very bad thing so banscore went from 0 -> 100 immidiately. Listed IPs are of
those who use older wallet versions, so not neccessarily an attacker but I've listed them anyway. From my perspective, there is not so much difference
between ignoring mandatory updates and intentionaly attacking the network.

I am in this list. I compiled the client from git master's head less than 24h ago. What nonsense is this? The chain is forked by the devs at a whim?
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002
Waves | 3PHMaGNeTJfqFfD4xuctgKdoxLX188QM8na
April 13, 2013, 12:07:29 PM
#77
All IPs listed above were submitting or relaying invalid blocks, which is very bad thing so banscore went from 0 -> 100 immidiately. Listed IPs are of
those who use older wallet versions, so not neccessarily an attacker but I've listed them anyway. From my perspective, there is not so much difference
between ignoring mandatory updates and intentionaly attacking the network.

I used terracoin-0.1.3-33-win32 client during the time I mined at P2Pool because I saw the message it was mandatory from block xxx.xxx.

I didn't know there is a newer one. Where do I find it? On SourceForge this is still the last one.

And "ignoring mandatory updates"? Come on guys... That's about 2-3 "mandatory updates" in 2 days because they f*cked up their own coin?
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
April 13, 2013, 12:07:18 PM
#76
But what does it mean now my IP is on that "ban list"?

Can I still mine Terracoin from my home-IP?
Can I still transfer Terracoin from my home-IP?
How do I get off that list?

edit: Back to Litecoin mining. PM me when you fix this.


It means nothing.

It just means that whatever node (client/daemon) that list came from, will not allow your node to connect to it for 24 hours. You will still be able to connect to any other node that has not personally banned your node. The ban only effects the node that issued it.

For whatever reason, that persons node thought your node was misbehaving and this is not uncommon and nothing to worry about unless you find yourself having a hard time getting connected and a bunch of nodes have banned you. This would be an indicator that your client/daemon is malfunctioning in some way.
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002
Waves | 3PHMaGNeTJfqFfD4xuctgKdoxLX188QM8na
April 13, 2013, 12:01:10 PM
#75
But what consequence does it have now my IP is on that "ban list"?

Can I still mine Terracoin from my home-IP?
Can I still transfer Terracoin from my home-IP?
How do I get off that list?

edit: Back to Litecoin mining. PM me when you fix this.

Edit: my TRC client goes out of sync every now and then, is that a result of the ban?
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
April 13, 2013, 11:58:38 AM
#74
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002
Waves | 3PHMaGNeTJfqFfD4xuctgKdoxLX188QM8na
April 13, 2013, 11:55:56 AM
#73
Your current Terracoin wallet is submitting or relaying invalid blocks, for example:

2013-04-13 16:24:14 received block 0000000000245a6c0f603705df6ff3b3aa8149d2319def5ed0e4023e86bd1b48 from 46.73.147.179:62383
2013-04-13 16:24:14 ERROR: AcceptBlock() : incorrect proof of work
2013-04-13 16:24:14 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : AcceptBlock FAILED
2013-04-13 16:24:14 Misbehaving: 46.73.147.179:62383 (0 -> 100) DISCONNECTING
2013-04-13 16:24:14 disconnecting node 46.73.147.179:62383

Upgrade to newest version as soon as possible!

What is the newest version?
I have the terracoin-0.1.3-33-win32 running on my mining rig.
full member
Activity: 148
Merit: 100
April 13, 2013, 11:48:18 AM
#72
old client maybe ? i just updated mine and everything looks good til now.
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002
Waves | 3PHMaGNeTJfqFfD4xuctgKdoxLX188QM8na
April 13, 2013, 11:43:47 AM
#71
full member
Activity: 148
Merit: 100
April 13, 2013, 11:43:01 AM
#70
I am not too sure about this.

hrm .. me neither, reading this forum, i'd expect to see another famous one, but not necessarily those. Are there any others in this list ? are all known popular pools in that list ?
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
April 13, 2013, 11:34:35 AM
#69
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 252
April 13, 2013, 11:21:14 AM
#68
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002
Waves | 3PHMaGNeTJfqFfD4xuctgKdoxLX188QM8na
April 13, 2013, 11:09:35 AM
#67
It was fun to find out how to get P2Pool running anyway Tongue
hero member
Activity: 631
Merit: 501
April 13, 2013, 11:00:58 AM
#66
Pages:
Jump to: