Pages:
Author

Topic: Special Auction for 5x Denarium 1/2 BTC Gold 2018 Coin - page 2. (Read 2769 times)

legendary
Activity: 2520
Merit: 3238
The Stone the masons rejected was the cornerstone.
Annnd this is Denariums response so far>>>>> Roll Eyes



copper member
Activity: 1918
Merit: 254
COMIT>>>>Yes it does seem so... Roll Eyes

These coins should have been designated lots 1 thru 5.

So much unnecessary confusion really..and Denarium should have been here in the last 30 minutes to clarify and update the highest bidders list.

I also see Ramelius only won one coin according to Teegumes list...shouldn't it have been two?

I mean I see that was his intention there..that is to bid on two coins.

Why would he bid higher when his first bid was one of the winning bids??

Yes the rules says what it says and if that's the case then the latest bid cancels the the first one?Huh  

If 5 lots were designated one for each coin all of this would have been avoided. Tongue

Absolutely, this auction won't win the professionalism price!

I haven't been contacted in the meantime, Denarium hasn't been online since yesterday afternoon... Huh

And you are right about teeGUMES list, it should be as follows:

Ramelius 1 @ 0.13
BitcoinNewsMagazine 1 @ 0.128
Ramelius 1 @ 0.127
hybridsole 1 @ 0.125
Comit 1 @ 0.123

Anyway, looking forward to where this is going. Roll Eyes

Based on following auction rule:
“When you post a bid, the bids in your previous posts are considered to be automatically canceled. You can put multiple bids in one post, however.”

The 0.13 from ramelius should therefor replace his previous bid of 0.127.
Teegumes list should therefor be the correct one:

Ramelius 1 @ 0.13
BitcoinNewsMagazine 1 @ 0.128
hybridsole 1 @ 0.125
Comit 1 @ 0.123
bavicrypto 1 @ 0.122

Unless they say that 20utc was the actualy stop time or....
I don’t even  care anymore at this point, just let us know the winning bids please.

Thanks
legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1164
Where is @Denarium? Would have expected him to check in by now with official auction results.
hero member
Activity: 2422
Merit: 668
Community management 24/7 for hire
legendary
Activity: 2520
Merit: 3238
The Stone the masons rejected was the cornerstone.

And you are right about teeGUMES list, it should be as follows:

Ramelius 1 @ 0.13
BitcoinNewsMagazine 1 @ 0.128
Ramelius 1 @ 0.127
hybridsole 1 @ 0.125
Comit 1 @ 0.123



Anyway, looking forward to where this is going. Roll Eyes


Agree..thats the way the winning list should be bro!

Everything else was a total clusterfuck  Shocked
sr. member
Activity: 800
Merit: 326
COMIT>>>>Yes it does seem so... Roll Eyes

These coins should have been designated lots 1 thru 5.

So much unnecessary confusion really..and Denarium should have been here in the last 30 minutes to clarify and update the highest bidders list.

I also see Ramelius only won one coin according to Teegumes list...shouldn't it have been two?

I mean I see that was his intention there..that is to bid on two coins.

Why would he bid higher when his first bid was one of the winning bids??

Yes the rules says what it says and if that's the case then the latest bid cancels the the first one?Huh  

If 5 lots were designated one for each coin all of this would have been avoided. Tongue

Absolutely, this auction won't win the professionalism price!

I haven't been contacted in the meantime, Denarium hasn't been online since yesterday afternoon... Huh

And you are right about teeGUMES list, it should be as follows:

Ramelius 1 @ 0.13
BitcoinNewsMagazine 1 @ 0.128
Ramelius 1 @ 0.127
hybridsole 1 @ 0.125
Comit 1 @ 0.123

Anyway, looking forward to where this is going. Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 2520
Merit: 3238
The Stone the masons rejected was the cornerstone.
COMIT>>>>Yes it does seem so... Roll Eyes

These coins should have been designated lots 1 thru 5.

So much unnecessary confusion really..and Denarium should have been here in the last 30 minutes to clarify and update the highest bidders list.

I also see Ramelius only won one coin according to Teegumes list...shouldn't it have been two?

I mean I see that was his intention there..that is, to bid on two coins.

Why would he bid higher when his first bid was one of the winning bids??

Yes the rules says what it says and if that's the case then the latest bid cancels the the first one?Huh  

If 5 lots were designated one for each coin all of this would have been avoided. Tongue
sr. member
Activity: 800
Merit: 326
hero member
Activity: 1596
Merit: 534
Man... Forum was down for half the day for me. I just decided to jump late and found these...

Nice buy everyone, I would have loved to have a 1/2 oz gold bitcoin for that price.

Do you still have more of these coins and are there any plans to have another auction?
member
Activity: 366
Merit: 29
fake payment pms are being sent from Denarium imposter. Check the "activity" and "merit" of any Denarium PMs
Real account has 37 activity and 1 merit
legendary
Activity: 1253
Merit: 1203
Ramelius 1 @ 0.13
BitcoinNewsMagazine 1 @ 0.128
hybridsole 1 @ 0.125
Comit 1 @ 0.123
bavicrypto 1 @ 0.122

A snipe in this format would have occurred at 19:57:00 UTC and have had all other participants fall asleep for 3 minutes to end at 20:00:00 UTC. 3 minutes were added to the clock at 19:59:40 UTC and the last valid bid was at 20:02:40 UTC. The only questionable part of the auction terms would have been if this ended at 20:00:00 UTC or 20:00:59 UTC but this did not play a factor in the bidding.
legendary
Activity: 2520
Merit: 3238
The Stone the masons rejected was the cornerstone.
Didn’t the auction end after my last bid? (as there were no more bids within 3 minutes)

I agree..Comit...yours was the last bid...nobody bid after you within three minutes
legendary
Activity: 2520
Merit: 3238
The Stone the masons rejected was the cornerstone.
Angry
UTC time made me confused
But good. Could not afford it anyway.

A countdown timer would help for sure.
hero member
Activity: 2422
Merit: 668
Community management 24/7 for hire
 Angry
UTC time made me confused
But good. Could not afford it anyway.
copper member
Activity: 1918
Merit: 254
3min after last bid seems hard with the website constantly going on and off today..
@denarium Let us know if the auction is finished or still running please

Just in case: bavicrypto 1 @ 0.126

The auction rules didn’t specify anything about forum downtime. By the way, forum hasn’t had any downtime the last couple of hours (unlike the rest of the day).

True, they didn’t specify anything about forum downtime. @denarium maybe something to include in the next auction. Especially on days like this.
sr. member
Activity: 800
Merit: 326
I could also make a case that my BitcoinNewsMagazine 1 @ 0.128 bid at 10 seconds before 20:00 UTC was the winning high bid but will leave it to @Denarium to sort out.

Could live with that.
copper member
Activity: 1918
Merit: 254
I could also make a case that my BitcoinNewsMagazine 1 @ 0.128 bid at 10 seconds before 20:00 UTC was the winning high bid but will leave it to @Denarium to sort out.

Would also make sense to me, as they don’t mention anything about an actual EXTENSION beyond 20:00UTC. I quote:


End date and time: Wednesday 29th of August at 20:00 UTC and when there have been no new bids in *3 minutes*!


So it should’ve ended right after BitcoinNewsMagazine 1 @ 0.128 , right?

Looking forward to denariums respond
legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1164
I could also make a case that my BitcoinNewsMagazine 1 @ 0.128 bid at 10 seconds before 20:00 UTC was the winning high bid but will leave it to @Denarium to sort out.
sr. member
Activity: 800
Merit: 326
3min after last bid seems hard with the website constantly going on and off today..
@denarium Let us know if the auction is finished or still running please

Just in case: bavicrypto 1 @ 0.126

The auction rules didn’t specify anything about forum downtime. By the way, forum hasn’t had any downtime the last couple of hours (unlike the rest of the day).
copper member
Activity: 1918
Merit: 254
3min after last bid seems hard with the website constantly going on and off today..
@denarium Let us know if the auction is finished or still running please

Just in case: bavicrypto 1 @ 0.126
Pages:
Jump to: