R U phucking retarded?
Obviously you know ZERO about trading right?
#1 Trading like new businesses all suffer from RETARDED people who have no plan no rules no ability to count or manage risk. 90% of businesses fail within their first 6months-a year. Why is that? Because they did not have what it takes.
#2 Most people lose in trading and this will add to the liquidity pool that will pay off investors of the ICO, phucking duh! I would imagine depending on the amount of coin holders which makes more sense for there to be less then more as a balanced relationship between token holders and traders using the platform is something to consider. Too many token holders = dilution of future returns... Hmmm have not seen how it is structured but the point is that Spectre management is taking 2% instead of 100% and it is based on volume instead of customer loses. Now if you wish to state that close to 20% goes to the liquidity pool and if most lose that it will be well funded in the future, well you are correct and who gets those funds or what happens to them as they build up? That is not a bad question and would need to be answered. There are a bunch of scenarios again depending on how they structure it. My bet is that it will go to the ICO token holders...
#3 Don't compare them to Israeli scam brokers who will manipulate prices/trap people/trade on their behalf in order to lose their money and any number of despicable measures they have used to defraud binary option traders world wide. They are getting 2% paid on volume and the rest is paid to token holders/winning traders ect ect. If nothing else I will take the lesser of two evils, in this model at least the conflict of interest is all but eliminated and you no longer have brokers making a living purely off your misery in a river of disgusting sh*t that has plagued this asset class for far too long.
If you wish to accuse them of anything, accuse them in moving things in the right direction! Only a broker/israeli insider would feel that way. Going to suck for them losing their 100% of clients losses to people who take 2% based on volume... Which business model do you favor more as a trade and who the phuck would you trust!
This makes no sense. How can you sustain a 75-90% return just by guessing that the price will go one way or another? If you guess it goes up and the price goes up only by .1% your still right, but are going to get a 75% return? The money come from the liquidity, thus detracting from the whole network value. So if people do guess right, the network is worth less even tho your personal value went up. So if you achieve your goal(making smarter traders), then you company will be worthless.
If people do guess wrong, then they lose everything nd so if your company succeeds then majority of users have lost money.
Your page states that a person needs a 57% correct guess rate (minimum) to make profit, due to the 2% fee on every trade(both entry and exit).
And your trading robot will advise them if they make a mistake? The same robot that controls the price points, trade access, and the liquidity pool? It sounds like you replaced the brokers with an automated version.
All in all, I feel you make this sound like it's a win win for all whIle also sayin that the majority will lose.
And yes the name makes no sense. I'm not sure what language you translated from but something is not right here. Just my 2 cents.