..but there are also who borrows money for no reason for the sake of getting their accounts in good credit scores, and it is also not a bad thing as long as they can pay it before their due dates
This actually gives rise to an individual with a strong debtor character, leading people to become dependent on debt. For some, avoiding debt seems impossible due to their insatiable needs that cannot be met solely by their salaries. However, it is worth reconsidering: until when should someone be in debt? Is it until death?
Living a simple life and enjoying the process of growth stimulates adrenaline more than taking shortcuts by accumulating debt just to fulfill our desires for fun. Many people underestimate the burden of debt because they have a job and the certainty of receiving their monthly salary.
Even though they can repay their debts, their financial planning will progress at a snail's pace. I still believe that debt incurred for consumptive activities will only add to our burdens, and such habits will become a time bomb that can trigger stress if the job we love unexpectedly disappears.
That is correct but that is correct with the “dead investments” and not with the “progressive investment”. The difference is very simply in both of them. Dead investments is something which will have depreciation of the value over the period of time. This includes cars, bikes, furniture, artefacts, paintings, electronics (LCD, smartphones, watches) and much more in the list. However, if you consider a loan to be taken for the progressive investment then that is the best thing to do. You can have example of Real estates, commercial shops, homes, offices, that get appreciation with the time due to increasing demand. They offer exponential growth in the value because they are materialistic things which are always in demand. Definitely what is said in above post is true but it’s even better if we segregate our investment like I mentioned here.