Topic: Spoetnik and Roach are Bitcoin maximalists and you can use this info to... - page 3. (Read 2773 times)

Thank you and i hope at least *some* of them are.
I hope to say something interesting sadly i get long winded and verbose though sorry guys

@OP
i have dealt with you lots before for a loooong time and ALWAYS about Monero.
You don't post about anything here except Monero defense.. usually crying Troll / FUD.
So no surprise here we go yet again.

I think people would know me as the guy who is constantly pushing Crypto
to step back and look at the bigger picture.. AKA: The context of the entire situation.
So in reality i don't care so much about any one coin for or against.

I also don't even have any coins because i simply gave them away to a developer.

But we ALL agree Bitcoin is king.
It is the benchmark which we ALL compare Altcoins to.. this is not exclusive to Roach & i.

You missed the part here where we seen thousands of coins made that have definitely contributed to staining Bitcoin.
A nasty vulgar scammy Altcoin scene does nothing for any aspect of Crypto.
It gives all of it a bad reputation.
Yet you all seem to think you can plant a rose in sea of shit then pretend your not surrounded by crap.
When you make ANOTHER coin and another attempt at the ANON "gimmick"
Then yes you do in fact deserve to be criticized..
Did Monero solve a problem and improve on Bitcoin ?
I personally think NO ..i think it was a step in reverse.

So by all means share your opinions.. just quit crying Troll and making up foolish FUD agenda's.
I grow tired off being told i am a paid FUD'er because i hold Dash coins or something.
When all i have tried to do is take each coin on an objective over-view style stance.

Little Miss "Fungability" here spews nothing but Failed pitiful Monero defense attacks
when ever dirt gets posted about Monero and that says lots about you and your motivations not mine shill.
Like generalizethis.. did you put in your first post here the only reason you made this topic
is because your a Monero shill and us two guys have criticized your shit coin Monero ?
Nope.. you avoided mentioning that in an attempt to skew things and portray us as a monster.
Do you think Monero is immune to criticism ?

In case people are wondering i have had a loooong history of putting this Monero shill in his place.
We have gone back & forth 100+ times and ALWAYS over Monero.
He sees something i said about it then runs around bad mouthing me etc.
Funny how he did not mention that at all in his first post here.. i suppose he forgot huh ?

He never has won any debate on anything and i honestly think he is pretty dumb.
He does not have the tools needed to defend Monero and always just ends up digging a hole making things worse.

So yeah let's have a big stickied warning saying ohh well anyone who criticizes Monero is a "Troll"
Sadly you shills can not self moderate the whole entire internet and people's private thoughts..
over your "Anon" coin LOL
Kind of funny the people who push the ANON bullshit the hardest are Crypto's biggest proponents of censorship  

Scotland detected

it must be. XMR is just a known by everybody as its the first to introduce the untraceable protocol.
XMR just didn't reached those who might be interested but once bitcoin will lose its value due to eth and DAO, XMR might gradually come to scene and can potential be used by shady guys  to which bitcoin also started.

Spoetnik and Roach ravings can be a good indicator for traders 

Spoetnik's posts are actually quite fun to read. I don't think he feels threatened by any coin.

They're a couple of baw sacks with the same intelligence and humour. Good to pin this thread as a warning to others of their motivations behind their FUD.

Is XMR a threat to bitcoin? No don't think so

Spoetnik and Roach are Bitcoin maximalists and you can use this info to....determine how threatened they feel by any altcoin. If they praise or ignore the coin, then it is no threat. If they attack the coin, they feel threatened by it--you can see their level of fear raise or lower by the coin's popularity in threads or the growth of marketcap. While I feel that roach's attacks are more technically sound, they do move towards emotional appeals as the threat level increases. Spoetnik's attacks are usually of a prodding/provoking nature and are generally of a low quality to noise ratio--classic trolling.

If anyone could create a spoetnik/roach fear index based on the correlation of their positive, negative and combined post output, I'd be interested. Seems they put most of their effort into ETH and XMR currently.