Topic: Spoetnik Coin - page 2. (Read 10079 times)

Strong interests for your coin, man.
You should give it some thought while you're away.

Better not to start with it at all (as your poll is saying).

Thanks for putting it on hold at least :-)

Edit Oh, and there is not a blocknet scandal. You created a "blocknet scandal". That is a subtile difference

BCT ... that's can be Spoetnik's coin ... built, launched, market listed ... all you have to do is show ... up
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annbct-coin-sha3-keccak-bitcointalk-coin-bct-pow-listed-on-mintpal-569997

Crypti is working on Custom BlockChains that will allow you to add your own coin and use the XCR network to forge the transactions. 

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=654463.new#new

ALso coming out with a hardare cubie to run the nodes. 

Have you ever checked out some of the stuff I've been working on? I've got mod powers and stuff on the Col forums and I've got something like double the posts there than I do here about lots of various stuff. It is really nice having your own forums cause if people annoy you, you can just delete or ban them, maybe you should set up your own forums or even ask Sudo23 or Heat007 on the Col forums if they would be willing to help build you some forums if you paid them. I don't know how to get in contact with them otherwise, they are pretty identity conscious but good honest people.

You wanna team up in some way? Maybe take over Colossuscoin? I dunno, the code is pretty bad but the forums are big and spacious and has a public section, members section, consul section, shoutbox, newsletter function for global mods and is laid out quite well not to mention it has been run for a full year with no issues or drama's. I'm not sure if something like that is too restrictive but in general Sudo has full control and can limit my powers on the forums but I have more power there than I really want or need but only Sudo can add people to the Development Team section or change peoples user group. Would be great to get the coin back up and running, good name, good rep but lots of struggles with development. Also have about 8-9 promo videos and a few hundred pictures and images, marketing strategies etc.

What do you think about something like that? You did say that in a proper scenario that you should only be working in testnet and projects with your friends and not shoving coins out to market as an experiment.

I'm open to suggestions.

I reported him too, mods deleted some of my posts too cause I guess I made some unfunny jokes? Maybe you don't like me posting, I can live with that but this is my favorite thread right now and I'm actually trying to contribute to it unlike most of the rest here. If you self moderated the thread then the same kids are going to go around saying you deleted all their posts and FUD about it.

Edit: Maybe you could have a moderated thread as well?

Oooo, you reported me, how cute is that? ))

GTFO poor ass, go get a real job

i reported him and left him a negative trust rating.

i knew i should have self modded this.. no surprise people kids act like a baby around here 
crypto needs age limits.. we shouldn't have 12 yr old's running financial markets in all aspects with no regulation.

^ wtf

@Spoetnik

How do you think it could be done where a person has their own coins but limited influence over the funds of the network? Let's be realistic here, everyone plans to sell some coins at some point but then what ways do you think would be best so that a person is guaranteed that they cannot get more than what they own themselves?

For me, I'm all about POS because POW will always create sell pressure on the markets no matter how low the reward so it's simply better not to have it at all. With POS only, all blocks of transactions work like miners on the network, gathering coinage into each of the block until it gathers enough coinage in order to be selected to Stake on the network. Difficulty re targeting then matters alot depending on what your minimum/maximum coinage is along with fees to either be collected or destroyed through stake.

If fees were higher and paid through Stake, then Stakers are paid interest, plus fees of the network that it would be more lucrative to Stake at a lower inflation so it encourages people to Stake their coins. The thing is though that if you have POS only with which you pay fees through Stake is that you can destroy a large portion of coins in one block and have them collected by whoever Stakes the next block, so then does that represent a security hole?

What about if with something like that you could have a massive block of fees destroyed and compensates the entire network evenly over time? Like if say if a bunch of coins are dumped into a tx fee (settxfee) that it adds into the block reward over a month or so, it would work like a share giveback so that when you build infrastructure and transactions increase, so does the rewards. The question would be how to do it properly, possibly fees could be destroyed and then the stake re targets to pay out over time like a floating point number?

Within a PoS network, Exchanges represent one of the largest challenges to overcome as well, the strength of a PoS network rests on reducing the barrier for people to stake their coins over a short period and guarding against exchanges Staking and selling coins and malicious behaviour

I can't say I have all the answers but I am confident that POW is NOT the answer.

This is great. LOL

sorry i don't buy into that stuff..

Spoetnik we need proof of developer

Need an icon set? Hal style!









Edit: Yes I made these icons along with the logo I last posted since you asked about it before but I like SZZT's logo more than the one I made, much cleaner (and cooler).

@Unbelive
I hear what your saying but i would not use my name for the coin i think.. i never really liked that idea.
but your comment would still make sense if i used my name and infamy around here as being an "evil troll" etc to hype up a coin.
so i get what your saying i really do and i appreciate your showing some intelligence here and not just blindly trusting any of us.

sure i'd like to be trusted but i advise you guys not trust me either.. i have always said i would sell out probably.
but would i get the opportunity and what kind would it be ? how tempting would it be ? I think we ALL have a price !!!
Like if some guy came along and said hey Spoetnik gimme your forum account for 100k usd in Bitcoin right now.. i'd say where do i send the password ? deal !! LOL

I hope to be judged on my actions and my track record.

@silvermetal
WOW you don't give up do you ?
Do really need to keep spamming my topic here about that guy ?

Nothing wrong with the person Digitalindustry. He can be a very amicable person.

I only dislike his behavior. He deceives and manipulates people, and he has a serious mental illness. I hope he get some help for that.

When I read the following article, I thought hm..maybe, maybe... (not saying he has this, I am not a psychiatrist)
http://betabeat.com/2013/03/me-and-you-and-everyone-we-know-the-many-many-many-faces-of-internet-multiples/

It is a rather long article, but one quote was interesting:

"For many multiples, the world seems curiously black and white: they are multiple, but do not have multiple personality disorder. They are different, but not sick. It’s incredibly complicated for a reporter to pick through, to discern who is telling the truth, who is lying and who sincerely believesthey are telling the truth but may not be. Without speaking to their psychiatrists—a profession they largely shun—or people in their lives who disagree that they are multiple, it was nearly impossible to determine who to believe. But if they were living happy, healthy, fulfilling lives, did it really matter whether they were truly multiple or not?""

No worries. I understand.
You do however, owe me a PM. 

It is nice idea. But  there some questions that appears when i put more thoughts in it.
Did developers paid some founds to Spoetnik, since they obviously used his name? If they say no, but he agreed to give his name, that would be so noobish. Latter when coin will get huge success, he wil just change his mind and want coin gets renamed or he gets paid well. If devs throw him some peanuts now all would get set since he would get paid and case closed.

There are more questions, but this is already so important that from the devs reaction it will be seen if it is worth to invest your so hard hodled BTC in it.

Yep Bitjohn...you got me
Reminds me to withdraw my coins from there, I thought cryptsy was run by rationale thinking persons with some ethics...naive me.

A collaboration between spoetnik and digitalindustry...bitcoin will fear the most extreme competition (in your dreams)

And finally you are taking over some of my suggestions..
I remember I suggested to collaborate with di in my first post of this thread

Butt...with re-branding hazard will not feel included? You will miss the oppurtunity to have an article about spoetnikcoin written by him.

this was quoted for Mr Obsessed with digitalindustry
and Prime agreed too sarcastically i am pretty sure but he/they support these coins they just added HYP now didn't they ?
pretty sure Prime STILL works for Cryptsy just uses a diff name i'm guessing and you all should know Bitjohn does.
so "silverindustry" there is your ONE guy ;)

and hey silverman because of your nagging & shit i am now thinking of starting one with him LOL

hey guys if a bunch of shady deceitful corrupt cloners can do it why can't i ?
is there a requirement you have to be a fucking piece of shit with a high minimum quota of coins "contributed to" or "experimented" with for "fun & profit" ?

many of you know damn well i am looking at you point blank in the eye and laughing at your raging HYPocrisy LOLOL

and wow for the love of mother fucking god why is that twisted fucker so bloody obsessed with following me around bashing digitalindustry ?
i am impressed how you manage to keep trying to work his name into the topic though it shows real dedication to your TROLLING ahhahah

edit:
@rugrats, I had no idea that guy was involved with the picture, i just thought it was funny and it was ignored here fast.. i almost missed it.

Sorry if people feel like their being ignored here.. the feedback is appreciated, just not the constant accusations of lying about alt accounts i have or coins i made before..
and of course Mr obsessed with digitalindustry.. that crap sure derails the topic hard and fast.. maybe that is their goal ?
hmm...
I wonder if the mods would sticky some info for me ? and that would be..
- Spoetnik never made a coin and has one account.

because the amount of forum comments here that accuse me of it is ridiculous, same goes with the Trust Rating crap jabs.