had a few days off. enjoyed a lot of results this past weekend, hope you guys did too.
Nonetheless, I would personally like if you (or other people considering to open a similar thread like this one) could provide some math on their efficacy on predictions and sport-betting, as well as some small proof they have been in sport-betting as long as they claim.
Yeah I agree with you on this very one and you atleast ought to show us some lroves of the 600 thousand bets you claimed to have placed in previous times because that will go a very long way to build ones confidence and trust in you and your predictions because over the time, we've seen some persons come out with claims of longer gears in betting and predictions and just end up giving us mess, please don't get me wrong and I do appreciate your work and I will be looking out for this thread.
Op also mentioned not to get his reward from forum members and I hope that stands for long as this thread is active and not behave like others who claimed their predictions were free but ended up asking people to join some private telegram group and make some payment but I trust op will be different.
QueenVera (& Hispo as well as others), I have the feeling we're not on the same page here. you guys asked me to "prove" my past experience, while I tried to explain to you that in this day in age there's no proofed way through which I could do that. I could post here some predictions I've made in the 2014-2015-2016-2017-2018,etc timeline. and? even if I would post those past predictions, either as text from a database, or images, people could still come and claim that the data is altered/edited/manipulated, etc. therefore I come again with the basic question -
how could I prove my experience to you?secondly, I have started this post on my own, for the challenges I was expecting to get from it. not for profit. not to prove anyone anything. I did claimed to have over 600k predictions under my belt with a decent win rate. still up until now, no one has taken the post as it was meant, and thereby place a match or multiple matches here as a request for a prediction(s). I can understand the level of uncertainty yet no one has tested me so far, right? instead of asking for proof (which again, imo can simply not be provided even if we include blockchain's immutability on the table), you could simply post 2, 3, 5, 10 matches. I'll do my best to give you a prediction on those and I guess afterwards things would move forward. or not.
I don't understand what you mean by this.
harapan, in direct comparison to the (casino) gambling world, in sports betting there are no guaranteed statistical odds set against you. this implies directly the fact that sport betting is skill based more than gambling. and I would like to add a question here for you: is stock/crypto investment gambling?
Italy - England [ over 8.5 corners @1.85 ]
Portugal - Lichtenstein [ over 5.5 goals @1.65 ]
just as I suspected, Portugal did not have the precision to score the 6 goals needed, even though they had 11 shots on target against Lichtenstein. the other prediction was an easy win, and also a very good odd for 9 corners per game. moving further.
I didn't watch this match, but in theory Portugal should be able to score more than 4 goals. because, these two squads have a very obvious gap. Portugal is ranked 9th, while Lichtenstein is ranked 198th. So, these two teams have a very significant gap. and if I refer to the available statistics, Portugal has a lot of opportunities. recorded, they had 35 total shots, 11 of which were on target, 13 shots off target, 11 shots blocked. with this statistical data, Portugal should be able to score more than 6 goals.
Apart from that, it seems that one thing has escaped your consideration, that this match is Portugal's first match. that is, the players need adjustments to the other players. plus, their new coach. however, the results could have been different if the coach had included Gocalo Ramos, after Ronaldo scored in the 63rd minute.
But at least, another bet is as you would expect for the over corner from Italy - England.
you summarized things flawlessly.
I would however argue on the fact that it was Portugal's first match in the qualification campaign for Euro 2024. imo Portugal had something more similar to a training match opportunity against Lichtenstein, and based on the huge amounts of occasions they should have scored a higher number of goals with ease. I did mentioned that I am not bullish on the prediction itself but decided to publish it anyway. in a match with a higher stake and where possibly goals would matter in the standings, I am quite sure Portugal would have scored even double the goals they scored in that match. As for Italy - England, things were peachy!
Adding two selections for today:
Poland - Albania [
Poland to score over 1.5 goals @
1.80 ]
Netherlands - Gibraltar [
over 5.5 goals @
1.50 ]
I expect for Poland to score at least 2 goals against Albania, especially after they lost with Czech Republic.
Netherlands were also beaten by France so they should in theory consider the match against Gibraltar an opportunity to benchmark their potential.
*
Again I will mention that this is not a financial advice and that you are entirely responsible in regards to any decision you might take about the posted matches above.