Pages:
Author

Topic: SPORTS BOOK RANKINGS ~ COMPLETELY USER GENERATED - page 15. (Read 42025 times)

legendary
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
Good, original idea...  Wink haha I like how this thread is basically plagiarism...

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoin-sports-betting-review-best-btc-sportsbooks-2018-customer-feedback-577102

Still active and will be much more active.  I got a little sick of keeping it updated regularly with directbet spamming scores left and right...

I've got more time to work on bitcoin activities including the thread that's been going for a few years.  I'll be testing out all the books myself as well.  Currently and over the past 4-5 years Nitrogen has been the only book I fully trust and has been high quality the whole time.  I keep hoping others can step their game up and compete but it hasn't happened yet.

Anyway, go BTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTC!!!
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1059
"Hello everyone, there used to be a Sports Book ranking that was COMPLETELY USER GENERATED, but now it's gone."

Are you referring to this thread - it seems to be active still - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=577102.1560

There used to be the one, but it's no longer completely user generated (or at least in the same objective way I try to do here).
You can read in the OP the following:

This year we're going to do things a "bit" different.  Independent user scores will be combined with an accumulation of opinions found within bitcointalk to generate a more accurate rank of the best bitcoin sports betting sites.

In the thread I'm managing, only user votes that are posted here are counted. Some users even express their opinion in this thread and don't vote, and I let them know that unless they objectively vote for the sports book (using the voting system expressed in the OP), their opinion will not be reflected in the ranks (simply because I can't express their opinion in a number and calculate an average score).

Not saying this is a good thing or a bad thing, and I'm not claiming that my thread is better than that one or not. Just saying this thread is different from that one, because the ranks showed in the OP are completely objective and user generated (they need to rank it with a number and they need to do it here). I can't search for votes on other threads, because the rank I have here has a meaning that is also explained in the OP, so users need to vote here.

I wished it had more votes, but I can't control that.
I appreciate that you took the time to vote, and please remember that you can change or add new votes any time you want. this is also important in order to try to keep the ranks accurate.

As for the errors you are getting I will check the sites. I just gather the votes, and I don't review them, so maybe they are not working anymore.
I removed directbet because I was aware that they closed, I will do the same with those and list it in the changelog.
Thank you for reporting.



All ranks have been updated until this post.
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1000
"Hello everyone, there used to be a Sports Book ranking that was COMPLETELY USER GENERATED, but now it's gone."

Are you referring to this thread - it seems to be active still - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=577102.1560
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1000
Nitrogensports = 5
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1000
For your 6th rated sportsbook (ranking listed 13 days ago) powerbet.io,  I get:

"404 Not Found

nginx/1.12.2"

Is it already out of business?

No update about this?


For betcoin.ag -

I'm at betcoin.ag and logged in.

I can now access everything listed on the horizontal links at the top of the page, except "SPORTS".

I get the pulsating "Loading", "Loading" and then the page has a message "There was an error on loading offer".

I haven't tried this site for years. It was always garbage technically, and I see it still is.


How do you login and get to the sports pages?
Doesn't work for me. Used to go thru the same nonsense years ago with different errors.

legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1059
Sportsbet.io and Nitrogen sports for me.  The others don't even compare

Hello Flagship11, thanks for showing your support for those bookies, but for that support to be reflected in our rankings table, I need a vote using the scale in the OP. Without that, all we have is your comment, and it will be harder for other users to acknowledge it as soon as it gets "listed behind" by the time we start getting more posts in this thread. So please take your time to rank those bookies, or any others you already know using this ranking system:

 
ScoresMeaning
[1]- Means that you don't trust the SportsBook, and you think users should stay away from it
[1.5...2.5]- You don't like it, but you don't have trust issues with this SportsBook
[3]- Neutral score. It's not bad, but not good either. There is something missing for you to continue making bets there
[3.5...4.5]- Anything from good to very good, but still not excellent
[5]- Means that you consider the SportsBook an excellent place to make your bets, and you recommend it to everyone

So as you can see, you can also leave negative votes, in case you don't trust a bookie.
A lot of users forget that, and think a vote will always means that they support that bookie, but it's also useful to prevent users from being scammed.
full member
Activity: 853
Merit: 144
Sportsbet.io and Nitrogen sports for me.  The others don't even compare
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1059

Noone interested to make a review about 1xbet , which means .... they know the site are so clear have a shady operation.
They avoid it so no wonder there only few reviewer lol , but let me add this as a review i have 0.009 there and not able to cash it out since last year , small amount and they still take it , funny fruegreads really Cheesy .
Cloudbet getting better and i can say they have a lot of live betting that basically what i looking for . I will upgrade my rate for them to 4.

Well but the ranking system provides enough options for users to vote for a bookie in order to say that they don't like it. That's why using the full range of the voting system is so important.

I'm just collecting the votes, so I'm not persuading users to give certain votes, but for instance, you haven't rated 1xbet yet, and apparently you are having a bad experience with them, so maybe it would be good if you voted for them. Don't know if you already consider them a scam site or not, but if you, do you can say just that and give them 1 point.

If anything changes you can still change you vote later, like you just did when you decided to improve your cloudbet vote from 3 to 4.



Edit: All ranks have been updated until this post
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1001
I noticed that 1xbit.com is on the list on second post. That site have an open accusation here in bitcointalk last year and I think it doesn't resolved yet*.

Do you consider removing it even there are votes or you will stick to the "user generated" ideas? (Well other sites too had an open scam accusation anyways).

That's why we have meanings for the scores. 1xbit.com has 4 votes, (5; 1; 3; 3,5). So that vote with 1 point represents just that.
Reading the meaning of the scores in the OP you have:
[1]   - Means that you don't trust the SportsBook, and you think users should stay away from it

So the scam accusation is represented here. The problem is that right now I only show the average of all votes, so that vote with [1] point gets mixed in with the rest, and that is wrong. I already have planned to show the % of votes for each category, but I still haven't found time to implement it. When that update is done, users will see that 1xbit has:

25% of the votes in the scam category
25% of the votes in the neutral category
25% of the votes in the good category
25% of the votes in the excellent category

If I was checking this table I would still be very cautious with this site because the votes are very divided, and there is a scam report.
Of course it wouldn't mean much since there are only 4 votes, but there is a scam alert so I would be cautious.

So yes, I will keep every site that gets a vote in these tables, but I will do my best to show what the votes actually mean. Also if we have more votes, the ranks will also be more accurate.

Another vote for NitrogenSports @ 5. Still haven't experienced any problem to them. My recent withdrawals goes into smooth phase without any problem about confirmation.

And another one, OneHash @ 3. I talked to one of their customer support via Live Chast (I forgot the name) and he is really nice and gived detailed info to my concern.

Thank you for your votes, and don't forget that you can vote for more bookies anytime you want, or change your current votes if your opinion ever changes.
Noone interested to make a review about 1xbet , which means .... they know the site are so clear have a shady operation.
They avoid it so no wonder there only few reviewer lol , but let me add this as a review i have 0.009 there and not able to cash it out since last year , small amount and they still take it , funny fruegreads really Cheesy .
Cloudbet getting better and i can say they have a lot of live betting that basically what i looking for . I will upgrade my rate for them to 4.
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1059
I noticed that 1xbit.com is on the list on second post. That site have an open accusation here in bitcointalk last year and I think it doesn't resolved yet*.

Do you consider removing it even there are votes or you will stick to the "user generated" ideas? (Well other sites too had an open scam accusation anyways).

That's why we have meanings for the scores. 1xbit.com has 4 votes, (5; 1; 3; 3,5). So that vote with 1 point represents just that.
Reading the meaning of the scores in the OP you have:
[1]   - Means that you don't trust the SportsBook, and you think users should stay away from it

So the scam accusation is represented here. The problem is that right now I only show the average of all votes, so that vote with [1] point gets mixed in with the rest, and that is wrong. I already have planned to show the % of votes for each category, but I still haven't found time to implement it. When that update is done, users will see that 1xbit has:

25% of the votes in the scam category
25% of the votes in the neutral category
25% of the votes in the good category
25% of the votes in the excellent category

If I was checking this table I would still be very cautious with this site because the votes are very divided, and there is a scam report.
Of course it wouldn't mean much since there are only 4 votes, but there is a scam alert so I would be cautious.

So yes, I will keep every site that gets a vote in these tables, but I will do my best to show what the votes actually mean. Also if we have more votes, the ranks will also be more accurate.

Another vote for NitrogenSports @ 5. Still haven't experienced any problem to them. My recent withdrawals goes into smooth phase without any problem about confirmation.

And another one, OneHash @ 3. I talked to one of their customer support via Live Chast (I forgot the name) and he is really nice and gived detailed info to my concern.

Thank you for your votes, and don't forget that you can vote for more bookies anytime you want, or change your current votes if your opinion ever changes.
legendary
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1398
For support ➡️ help.bc.game
I noticed that 1xbit.com is on the list on second post. That site have an open accusation here in bitcointalk last year and I think it doesn't resolved yet*.

Do you consider removing it even there are votes or you will stick to the "user generated" ideas? (Well other sites too had an open scam accusation anyways).



Another vote for NitrogenSports @ 5. Still haven't experienced any problem to them. My recent withdrawals goes into smooth phase without any problem about confirmation.

And another one, OneHash @ 3. I talked to one of their customer support via Live Chast (I forgot the name) and he is really nice and gived detailed info to my concern.
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
looking for information of sportsbook which accepts dogecoin?
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1059
Hello everyone all ranks have been updated until this post.
Betcoin.ag achieved 10 votes and was moved to the main table on the OP. It is now ranked 4th with 3.40. This change was recorded in the changelog in the second post.

I still need to make the update I've promised, so show the percentage(%) of votes each bookie has for each rank interval. This will help to better understand what users think about the bookies they rank, but I still haven't found time to do that. I will try to make it during this next week, but I can't make any promises.

Thank you for your votes, and votes for a good year to everyone!
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1059
1xbet: 4
Cloudbet: 3.5
Nitrogen Sports: 3.5
Betcoin.ag: 2.5
Intertops.eu: 2.5

Note: To me, the most important criteria is the odds. I prefer an untrusted sportsbook with decent odds, over a trusted one with low odds. Betting with low odds, is a guaranteed way of losing your money in the long run.

Hello Ambakay, thank you for your vote. I still haven't "settled" after the Holidays, but I will update the rankings as soon as possible.
Please remember that you can change your votes or add new ones anytime you want, if your experience with bookies ever changes. In order to do so, just make a new post with the new information, so I can update everything.

looking for information of sportsbook which accepts dogecoin?

Hello pnyiaart, right now I'm not aware of any bookies that accept doge. Maybe other users can help you.
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
1xbet: 4
Cloudbet: 3.5
Nitrogen Sports: 3.5
Betcoin.ag: 2.5
Intertops.eu: 2.5

Note: To me, the most important criteria is the odds. I prefer an untrusted sportsbook with decent odds, over a trusted one with low odds. Betting with low odds, is a guaranteed way of losing your money in the long run.
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1059
NitrogenSports.eu. And it's not even close...

Hello xPPx, thanks for participating in this thread, but without a vote, you opinion will not have any impact in our rankings table. So if you don't mind, please rank NitrogenSports.eu, using a number between 1 to 5, where 1 represents that the site is a scam and you don't support it, and 5 means that is an excellent bookie for user to place their bets on (you can use decimal increments).

Thank you.
sr. member
Activity: 531
Merit: 250
NitrogenSports.eu. And it's not even close...
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1059
nitrogensports    rating     :   5

 just the best ever  bitcoing casino and sportsbook i saw


Thanks for you vote Ginos. Please remember that you can add new votes, or change the current one anytime you want. It's important users keep their votes updated if their experience with bookies chance, in order to keep these ranks as accurate as possible. Thank you.



I still haven't done the update in order to display the percentage (%) of votes each bookie has on each rank interval, but I will do it as soon as possible. I just didn't have enough time to do that, and I'm still deciding which will be the bet option to display that new information on this thread.

All votes have been updated until this post.
member
Activity: 116
Merit: 100
nitrogensports    rating     :   5

 just the best ever  bitcoing casino and sportsbook i saw
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1059
Really i am pinned with Fairlay, i have no good acknowldge of other bookmakers, but reading feedbacks are very helpful

Hello shacc, I'm glad to know that you've found some of the feedback left here from other users useful. Since you like Fairlay could you kindly leave your vote in this thread? You can add a small review, explaining why you like them, but leaving at least a vote is very important, so that your opinion is reflected on our Table Rankings (that you can find in the OP of this thread). Thank you.
Pages:
Jump to: