I could have sworn that I have a 1-0 over my opponent because I checked after the match had ended after about 5 minutes, and it was still recorded as a single shot on goal for Club Brugge, but I had to check again after reading your comment to find it's actually 2 shots on goal, I'm still trying to find the second shot that was counted as on target, because even before their goal, they had zero shots on target, I want to believe to they reviewed every shot later on to decide which should be awarded as on target or not.
I was sure I'm gonna lose that question when they had 0 shots on target in the 80th minute. Still, they managed to get 2 until the end, 1 of them was a goal and they had a shot on target later on.
I used UEFA's official statistic for rating the question,
you can see it here under 'attacking' segment.
Knowing that Club Brugge struggled in the first leg at home, I didn't expect them to upset Benfica in the second leg, but I did anticipate them to go all out offensively because they have nothing to lose. I was expecting them to at least attempt more than three shots on goal in their 104 minutes of play. They attempted 31 dangerous attacks and played the most corner kicks (5), and still made under 2.5 shots on target. poor
Kodus to all the non-chelsea supporters who believed in the team more than I did; as a chelsea supporter, it's incredibly difficult to believe in this team given our performance over the past 15 games.
I felt joy for the first time this year. What is the outright odd of Chelsea winning the Champions League?
The last time we occupy 10th we won the champions league, its happening.