Pages:
Author

Topic: SPORTSBETTING : Not for everyone? - page 4. (Read 1726 times)

legendary
Activity: 2030
Merit: 1030
Privacy is always important
August 09, 2016, 02:11:57 PM
#7
Yeah not everyone if you are not making a profit in sports betting and you are making a profit in dice game better to stay in dice game instead. because people are not the same luck if i can make a profit in dice game i will choose other game like sports betting and try my self their if there is a goo result..
And decide where i can stay or not..
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1000
August 09, 2016, 02:07:39 PM
#6
Sportsbetting isn't for everyone. Its a form of gambling just like the others, where you can sometimes get an edge by doing good research on the games. With a lot of resources to do the research before the games helps in getting a small edge on sportsbetting.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 503
August 09, 2016, 01:16:38 PM
#5
I recently made a poll for which gambling game people think has more odds for winning.
I was actually surprised that a lot voted for Sportsbetting, so I read up a bit about it. http://docomocasino.com/pros-cons-sports-gambling.html
I was expecting Dice to take the lead,(I prefer Dice myself), I would like to try Sportsbetting (they say it has highest odds?) but I can't seem to get past the research required to learn about the sports involved, to actually make a bet. Especially since individuals who are not into sports has way worse chances of winning compared to those who are actually interested.
Comments? I'll probably just stick to Dice. lol.
Lol, nothing is actually made for everybody even if some people are told to bet who will score first in a big team versus small team tournament, they will still lose not because they are unlicky just because its not meant for them and I like you for recognising your call and sticking to it. Its a good way as some people can be good in all ways but that even is not meant for everybody... My opinion though...
legendary
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1000
August 09, 2016, 01:11:43 PM
#4
sportsbetting only takes upto a hour or less for me and that's researching player conditions, team histories, and many other stats when determing where to place a wager Cheesy its fast and a winner for many inc me Tongue
full member
Activity: 189
Merit: 100
August 09, 2016, 01:05:50 PM
#3
I don't think betting on sports has to be that time-consuming and research-heavy. If you focus building your knowledge around just a few leagues, then it's pretty easy to continue following those leagues, and you aren't overwhelmed by the sheer number of teams around the world and all the stats surrounding them. Get to know a few leagues very well, and from then on you can trust your gut instinct when betting rather than having to spend hours researching teams or players you are unfamiliar with.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
August 09, 2016, 12:47:56 PM
#2
Sports where a lot easier say 10 years ago before stats and analytics where scoured to a higher percentage for the lines.
Also the factor in a lot sports realizing where the main viewers are coming from,drove games to be manipulated for more excitement.
The good ole days.
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 503
Crypto.games
August 09, 2016, 12:45:05 PM
#1
I recently made a poll for which gambling game people think has more odds for winning.
I was actually surprised that a lot voted for Sportsbetting, so I read up a bit about it. http://docomocasino.com/pros-cons-sports-gambling.html
I was expecting Dice to take the lead,(I prefer Dice myself), I would like to try Sportsbetting (they say it has highest odds?) but I can't seem to get past the research required to learn about the sports involved, to actually make a bet. Especially since individuals who are not into sports has way worse chances of winning compared to those who are actually interested.
Comments? I'll probably just stick to Dice. lol.
Pages:
Jump to: