Please explain why you felt it was a good idea to take our private conversation public in a locked thread?
Why did you feel you should be able to make claims when I did not have the ability to respond?
Will you in the future post potential investors PMs in public when they are not happy with the way you operate?
Thank you.
Topic: SRoulette posting PMs in a locked thread. Dishonest person. - page 2. (Read 3510 times)
Whats the problem when this was recognizable as a joke? When you dont read it or dont think its funny its your thing. But you didnt get harmed or something. So i wonder what your interest is in here.
And speaking agains wikileaks... that only show that they are idealists with a backbone.
And speaking agains wikileaks... that only show that they are idealists with a backbone.
Thank you for bringing some reason to this thread.
I (SRoulette) personally do support Wikileaks, I made the mistake of creating the Donation game for our site without clearing it with my other 2 partners.
The concern was raised 3 weeks ago by ThePitHelper and CodeMonkey that we should remain apolitical.
Rather than simply removing the games we decided to remove them from our advertising links at the page footer.
They are still available to play, we plan to wait until the thread several pages deep in the gambling section before disabling the game and manually paying out its current jackpot donation to wikileaks. The same will be done for erowid.
Looks like they removed the game
They shouldn't fold under pressure like that
From me or the US govt? Life in jail I'm sure sucks...
This is quite amusing to see Chaang try and take credit for the games.
We patiently explained our (and specifically my) regret about politicizing our site and the reason why the game had already been removed from the footer, prior to him posting these comments.
I do not think it is a big deal or dishonest. He said that he was only taking positive votes into account.
Let us say that he made a poll about whether or not someone was a scammer. He first had "yes" and "no" options and then he changed "no" to "of course" later to make the accused person look worse. If this were the case, I would say it is dishonest because his intentions were not good.
But that is not the case. The poll was about adding PPCoins to his own website. Changing "no" to "of course" did not hurt anyone and did not help him get more money. There were no good or bad effects of this other than making you mad. Why do you believe he had bad intentions? If his intentions were in fact bad what was he trying to achieve?
Let us say that he made a poll about whether or not someone was a scammer. He first had "yes" and "no" options and then he changed "no" to "of course" later to make the accused person look worse. If this were the case, I would say it is dishonest because his intentions were not good.
But that is not the case. The poll was about adding PPCoins to his own website. Changing "no" to "of course" did not hurt anyone and did not help him get more money. There were no good or bad effects of this other than making you mad. Why do you believe he had bad intentions? If his intentions were in fact bad what was he trying to achieve?
Indeed this was my reasoning for why the joke would have been taken in good humor, oh how wrong I was
My personal opinion was it was dishonest. This was sent to him in a PM. He then posted that PM in a public locked thread and responded to it.
You do not know but there were many PMs going back about a month. We were talking about working together and potentially me buying part of his operation. He took one of many PMs and posted it in a public locked thread and responded there.
He wanted to move this conversation to the public and to do so in a way I could not respond. I felt it was dishonest and explained that to have a reputation that is clean and fair is need in the BTC world, i did this in private!
If you guys think it is funny joke or not does not matter, the context was about my being a partner in the operation and I explained I could not do that if he was not honest and trusted. He is the one who took this out of context and made it public.
I did not start this... This is a warning to anyone who thinks about working with this guy...
You do not know but there were many PMs going back about a month. We were talking about working together and potentially me buying part of his operation. He took one of many PMs and posted it in a public locked thread and responded there.
He wanted to move this conversation to the public and to do so in a way I could not respond. I felt it was dishonest and explained that to have a reputation that is clean and fair is need in the BTC world, i did this in private!
If you guys think it is funny joke or not does not matter, the context was about my being a partner in the operation and I explained I could not do that if he was not honest and trusted. He is the one who took this out of context and made it public.
I did not start this... This is a warning to anyone who thinks about working with this guy...
False Chaang, we have ~ a brief discussion totaling 2 messages from each of us over the space of 1 2 days on the matter and we politely declined you.
There was no ongoing discussion, you had no stake in our company at any time.
Any mod wishing to audit our entire conversation history with Chaang to verify this is welcome to do so if Chaang also agrees to verify we are being factual while Chaang is being deceptive.
Could we get a MOD to verify SRoulette's claims about Goat lying about how much ongoing discussion there was in PMs about being business partners etc. This would expose Goat for the scum he is.
Whats the problem when this was recognizable as a joke? When you dont read it or dont think its funny its your thing. But you didnt get harmed or something. So i wonder what your interest is in here.
And speaking agains wikileaks... that only show that they are idealists with a backbone.
And speaking agains wikileaks... that only show that they are idealists with a backbone.
Thank you for bringing some reason to this thread.
I (SRoulette) personally do support Wikileaks, I made the mistake of creating the Donation game for our site without clearing it with my other 2 partners.
The concern was raised 3 weeks ago by ThePitHelper and CodeMonkey that we should remain apolitical.
Rather than simply removing the games we decided to remove them from our advertising links at the page footer.
They are still available to play, we plan to wait until the thread several pages deep in the gambling section before disabling the game and manually paying out its current jackpot donation to wikileaks. The same will be done for erowid.
Looks like they removed the game
They shouldn't fold under pressure like that
From me or the US govt? Life in jail I'm sure sucks...
This is quite amusing to see Chaang try and take credit for the games.
We patiently explained our (and specifically my) regret about politicizing our site and the reason why the game had already been removed from the footer, prior to him posting these comments.
I do not think it is a big deal or dishonest. He said that he was only taking positive votes into account.
Let us say that he made a poll about whether or not someone was a scammer. He first had "yes" and "no" options and then he changed "no" to "of course" later to make the accused person look worse. If this were the case, I would say it is dishonest because his intentions were not good.
But that is not the case. The poll was about adding PPCoins to his own website. Changing "no" to "of course" did not hurt anyone and did not help him get more money. There were no good or bad effects of this other than making you mad. Why do you believe he had bad intentions? If his intentions were in fact bad what was he trying to achieve?
Let us say that he made a poll about whether or not someone was a scammer. He first had "yes" and "no" options and then he changed "no" to "of course" later to make the accused person look worse. If this were the case, I would say it is dishonest because his intentions were not good.
But that is not the case. The poll was about adding PPCoins to his own website. Changing "no" to "of course" did not hurt anyone and did not help him get more money. There were no good or bad effects of this other than making you mad. Why do you believe he had bad intentions? If his intentions were in fact bad what was he trying to achieve?
Indeed this was my reasoning for why the joke would have been taken in good humor, oh how wrong I was
My personal opinion was it was dishonest. This was sent to him in a PM. He then posted that PM in a public locked thread and responded to it.
You do not know but there were many PMs going back about a month. We were talking about working together and potentially me buying part of his operation. He took one of many PMs and posted it in a public locked thread and responded there.
He wanted to move this conversation to the public and to do so in a way I could not respond. I felt it was dishonest and explained that to have a reputation that is clean and fair is need in the BTC world, i did this in private!
If you guys think it is funny joke or not does not matter, the context was about my being a partner in the operation and I explained I could not do that if he was not honest and trusted. He is the one who took this out of context and made it public.
I did not start this... This is a warning to anyone who thinks about working with this guy...
You do not know but there were many PMs going back about a month. We were talking about working together and potentially me buying part of his operation. He took one of many PMs and posted it in a public locked thread and responded there.
He wanted to move this conversation to the public and to do so in a way I could not respond. I felt it was dishonest and explained that to have a reputation that is clean and fair is need in the BTC world, i did this in private!
If you guys think it is funny joke or not does not matter, the context was about my being a partner in the operation and I explained I could not do that if he was not honest and trusted. He is the one who took this out of context and made it public.
I did not start this... This is a warning to anyone who thinks about working with this guy...
False Chaang, we have ~ a brief discussion totaling 2 messages from each of us over the space of 1 2 days on the matter and we politely declined you.
There was no ongoing discussion, you had no stake in our company at any time.
Any mod wishing to audit our entire conversation history with Chaang to verify this is welcome to do so if Chaang also agrees to verify we are being factual while Chaang is being deceptive.
My personal opinion was it was dishonest. This was sent to him in a PM. He then posted that PM in a public locked thread and responded to it.
You do not know but there were many PMs going back about a month. We were talking about working together and potentially me buying part of his operation. He took one of many PMs and posted it in a public locked thread and responded there.
He wanted to move this conversation to the public and to do so in a way I could not respond. I felt it was dishonest and explained that to have a reputation that is clean and fair is need in the BTC world, i did this in private!
If you guys think it is funny joke or not does not matter, the context was about my being a partner in the operation and I explained I could not do that if he was not honest and trusted. He is the one who took this out of context and made it public.
I did not start this... This is a warning to anyone who thinks about working with this guy...
You do not know but there were many PMs going back about a month. We were talking about working together and potentially me buying part of his operation. He took one of many PMs and posted it in a public locked thread and responded there.
He wanted to move this conversation to the public and to do so in a way I could not respond. I felt it was dishonest and explained that to have a reputation that is clean and fair is need in the BTC world, i did this in private!
If you guys think it is funny joke or not does not matter, the context was about my being a partner in the operation and I explained I could not do that if he was not honest and trusted. He is the one who took this out of context and made it public.
I did not start this... This is a warning to anyone who thinks about working with this guy...
And a warning to people about working with you as well. You wanted to discuss things privately and he made it public. Well boo fucking hoo!
Goat you are probably one of the worst people on here to work with. Go make your millions on those train-wreck investments you keep getting involved with!
My personal opinion was it was dishonest. This was sent to him in a PM. He then posted that PM in a public locked thread and responded to it.
You do not know but there were many PMs going back about a month. We were talking about working together and potentially me buying part of his operation. He took one of many PMs and posted it in a public locked thread and responded there.
He wanted to move this conversation to the public and to do so in a way I could not respond. I felt it was dishonest and explained that to have a reputation that is clean and fair is need in the BTC world, i did this in private!
If you guys think it is funny joke or not does not matter, the context was about my being a partner in the operation and I explained I could not do that if he was not honest and trusted. He is the one who took this out of context and made it public.
I did not start this... This is a warning to anyone who thinks about working with this guy...
You do not know but there were many PMs going back about a month. We were talking about working together and potentially me buying part of his operation. He took one of many PMs and posted it in a public locked thread and responded there.
He wanted to move this conversation to the public and to do so in a way I could not respond. I felt it was dishonest and explained that to have a reputation that is clean and fair is need in the BTC world, i did this in private!
If you guys think it is funny joke or not does not matter, the context was about my being a partner in the operation and I explained I could not do that if he was not honest and trusted. He is the one who took this out of context and made it public.
I did not start this... This is a warning to anyone who thinks about working with this guy...
Who cares about the SRoulette, clearly the dude isn't smart enough to create his own ideas, so he had to badly copy satoshi dice.
Back on the attack I see lol....sounds familiar.
I never even posted in any of his threads or bashed him before so it doesn't sound familiar
Sorry it sounds familiar to what I do.
Who cares about the SRoulette, clearly the dude isn't smart enough to create his own ideas, so he had to badly copy satoshi dice.
Back on the attack I see lol....sounds familiar.
I do not think it is a big deal or dishonest. He said that he was only taking positive votes into account.
Let us say that he made a poll about whether or not someone was a scammer. He first had "yes" and "no" options and then he changed "no" to "of course" later to make the accused person look worse. If this were the case, I would say it is dishonest because his intentions were not good.
But that is not the case. The poll was about adding PPCoins to his own website. Changing "no" to "of course" did not hurt anyone and did not help him get more money. There were no good or bad effects of this other than making you mad. Why do you believe he had bad intentions? If his intentions were in fact bad what was he trying to achieve?
Let us say that he made a poll about whether or not someone was a scammer. He first had "yes" and "no" options and then he changed "no" to "of course" later to make the accused person look worse. If this were the case, I would say it is dishonest because his intentions were not good.
But that is not the case. The poll was about adding PPCoins to his own website. Changing "no" to "of course" did not hurt anyone and did not help him get more money. There were no good or bad effects of this other than making you mad. Why do you believe he had bad intentions? If his intentions were in fact bad what was he trying to achieve?
we all saw the poll change, who the fuck cares.
Its his website and he can add PPCoin if he wants, I dont support it but whatever I don't care. The fact that he changed the poll blatantly when we all saw that it used to be "no" is actually quite funny.
cleanliness is next to Godliness, goat. Being a douche bag doesn't put you on the right path of crypto-currency god.
Its his website and he can add PPCoin if he wants, I dont support it but whatever I don't care. The fact that he changed the poll blatantly when we all saw that it used to be "no" is actually quite funny.
cleanliness is next to Godliness, goat. Being a douche bag doesn't put you on the right path of crypto-currency god.
Your support of his behavior also shows what type of person you are.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1191290 (recommend reading the whole thread)
I see this of yours post as a revenge for my causing your site to be taken down as well for being dishonest and not paying your customers their winnings. You are either a scammer or dishonest and incompetent.
Goat get your facts straight I support him and I'm not "that" type of person you claim Dice is. Dice is an honorable forum member. Completed a recent deal in which he paid first and I ensured the goods he purchased were received by him in a timely manner. If you can't take a joke, then Pirate's joke went WAY over your head in so many ways. LOL!
The thread seems to be unlocked now Goat. You can stop crying now. LOL!
LOL!
His actions are his own. You can not blame me for them.
Whats the problem when this was recognizable as a joke? When you dont read it or dont think its funny its your thing. But you didnt get harmed or something. So i wonder what your interest is in here.
And speaking agains wikileaks... that only show that they are idealists with a backbone.
And speaking agains wikileaks... that only show that they are idealists with a backbone.
The issue is he took a private conversation and then responded publicly in a locked thread.
He is the one who is making the issue here in public, he wanted the drama.
Oh so you are embarrassed by your own actions hence the hissy fit ?
That is understandable, any decent person would be ashamed of your behaviour.
should not trust someone who thinks being dishonest is funny.
And what of someone who thinks being funny is dishonest? It's too obvious to be deceitful.
On the other hand posting private PMS publicly is poor form if it's true.
Agreed, but I can understand the motive - if Chaang is really that abusive and threatening in pm he needed to be outed and I applaud them for calling him on his childish tantrum if not for the manner in which they did it.
The original thread and chaangs reaction is simply crazy - only an unhinged person (or a person with an agenda which I suspect is the real case here) would make such a leap from obvious joke to character accusations, it really is revolting to see.
I hope this does not discourage them - still if a troll like chaang could then you should not be running a business i guess.
should not trust someone who thinks being dishonest is funny.
And what of someone who thinks being funny is dishonest? It's too obvious to be deceitful.
On the other hand posting private PMS publicly is poor form if it's true.
After reading the thread you posted (any accusations of dishonesty directed at gambling operators concern me) I can only assume you have no sense of humour and are just a liar and an unpleasant and bitter dick head.
Stop crying wolf please, the grown ups are trying to gamble.
Stop crying wolf please, the grown ups are trying to gamble.
Looks like they removed the game
They shouldn't fold under pressure like that
It was a good move to remove it
, you know who wikileaks is? Looks like they removed the game
They shouldn't fold under pressure like that
From me or the US govt? Life in jail I'm sure sucks...
Looks like they removed the game
They shouldn't fold under pressure like that
Looks like they removed the game
Seems like a smart move.
Looks like they removed the game
Jump to: