But there are stablecoins not pegged to a dollar, but to a gold or some other precious metal. At least their creators say they are pegged. But like with stablecoins pegged to a fiat, stablecoins pegged to precious metals are being audited regularly so there shouldn't be an issue.
But once again that doesn't make them anything special. They're tied to the value of a much larger market with added risks too.
Some seem to believe they solve a financial problem like a proper cryptocurrency. The only one they do solve is trading shitcoins in more shitholes.
No one said (at least not me) that they solve any financial problem. They don't solve anything except giving traders a way to escape to some stable coin (that has less volatility) when they expect price of BTC or any other coin to fall.
I think there are many misconceptions in this discussion.
Stable coins are
private debt.
A company says: "Give me 1 USD and I will give you back a cryptocurrency which, if you bring it back to me I will pay you back your 1 usd with ZERO interest rate".
People who hold stable coins are just lending money with zero interest rate. It is much better to have dollar itself.
The problem is that you don't know if Tether or whaever company
can really pay back that loan.About GOLD stable coins that's exactly the same. Actually, it is exactly the same as buying a Gold ETF.
The major problem is that if you buy an ETF there are much more regulations on them, so you are safer. Do you think any stable coin will spend millions of dollars per year in auditions and stuff like that, such as ETF GLD or IAU?
Of if a stable coin is holding an ETF, which is possible, that is just double risk.
Stable coin idea is really amazing. However, for that to work we really need strong regulation. Otherwise, stable coins issuers will just run away with people's money. Technology is here to stay, so I believe in future even those gold etfs, stocks, etc may use blockchain transactions. It would be cool if GLD or IAU itself made their own cryptocurrencies, for example.