I'm not OP, but just let me say some words here.
When they hide all the data, they should not be the responsibles to show legitimacy?
I mean, if you check this website regularly, you can see people with 20m+ dollars waggered in a day, which will convert in a 25k dollars prize in the daily race.
They boar about 1% house edge, so it means, mathematically speaking, that this players have sacrified about 200k dollars to win 25k in prizes.
Sacrifice is not the right term in this situation. I think the better word would be gambled. They gambled 200k dollars yes, but who knows if it was a loss or a win, it is a total wagered regardless of the bet result after all.
All that seems a bit unreasonable, dont you agree with me?
No, I don't agree. Maybe you should dig in more information to support your claim.
I personally dont think someone with this ammount of cash would be dumb.
All that can be just speculations, but after all we have no way to prove that, unless someone get access to their database.
There are lots of people who play with that huge amount. Not because we are not able to bet on that amount, no one can.
I respect your answer.
But you know that what i have said is true in the long run. Every win will be canceled (and a bit more).
"Sacrifice" is not the right term in YOUR OPINION.I also agree with the argumentation that there is alot of people that can gamble huge ammounts, but i cant see a reasonable argumment on how they can do it for long time.
But not entering in this merit, i have problems with their transparency. Its a bit strange how insane ammounts of wagger are made to just catch "small prizes". And i say that because that situations repeats everyday on this site. If a rich person starts to gamble this way, they will get poor in no time. And just to remember, rich people are a small portion of our society.
I have no problems with gambling sites, if they have transparency. Otherwise, atleast in my opinion, its just a sophisticated scam system.
Also, if they hold all the data, they should be not responsible to prove their legitimacy?