It is unlikely that one can say that we are in that position from which we can make some kind of choice regarding the preferred way of calculating payments. Rather, we are forced to choose from what is.
Fixed payments are a good choice when it comes to coins that are already being traded and are worth something, such as bitcoin. The best bounties with payment in Bitcoin have fixed payments.
Topic: Stake vs Fixed bounty allocation - page 5. (Read 7179 times)
The both have their advantages and disadvantages, however, I will personally choose stake bounties over token based bounties. This is simply because with a stake bounty, there is always a great chance of earning more if the level of participation is low. The more stakes you accumulate as a hunter, the greater your earnings and vice versa. This doesn't apply to token based bounties.
The two are basically the same, they are just two words that can be used interchangeably. Bounty mangers can decide to use fixed tokens or stake based. At the end of the day, it is just a way or means to divide or distribute tokens to participants of a bounty campaign.
For me personally, I don't really mind what kind of bounty at I do, as long as the project is decent and it pays out and we can in the end trade the tokens or coins they dish out. If I am doing either a stake or fixed bounty, but the project turns out to be a scam or some crap coin that never ever gets onto an exchange, then it doesn't really matter what I do. I am now just looking for a few very decent bounties to do over the coming months, in the hope that by 2020 bull run or beyond, I have a few decent coins to hold as I believe this is my last chance and year in Crypto to do anything of substance. I lsot my big chance in 2018 so now am giving myself one more go at it. I notice many of the fixed bounties don't give high rewards, but if the project is very good, then it might work out better than a so-called higher-paying stake type bunty, especially if the coin or token gets dumped hard.
Fixed awards bounty campaigns have an advantage because they do not depend on the number of participants and the time duration of the campaign. You also clearly know how many will be your earnings in one week and are willing to work for such money.
There is little difference between the stakes or fixed bounty; the most important factor is the number of participants and the strategy you want to apply
But frankly; I like a stake bounty; it gives you an avenue to work strategically
But frankly; I like a stake bounty; it gives you an avenue to work strategically
I prefer fixed bounty because it won't change after bounty ends. I saw a lot of bounty stakes but until the end of the bounty, the team made the decision to cut stakes if there were few participants.
i think stakes allocation is better than fixed allocation cause bounty payment system with stakes is always in accordance with your hard work. in stakes allocation, if you work harder, you will get more tokens, it means you get more rewards for your jobs. in my experience i never join bounty with fixed allocation payment so i dont know more about that 
. but if i see, all member here prefer stakes allocation than fixed allocation, so i will suggest stakes allocation too 
. but if i see, all member here prefer stakes allocation than fixed allocation, so i will suggest stakes allocation too 
Bounty campaigns with fixed allocation are in most cases less profitable. It is due to low amount of participants in bounty campaigns. I remember when twitter campaigns had around 5000 participants, now most of them have around 200 participants. This makes stake bounty campaigns more profitable.
I would choose also a stake bounty campaign if the reward is in token, but if the reward is in BTC or other coins that have a good liquidity, I might choose it since it's more stable and will assure that I will be getting my reward. Everyone might have different approach when it comes to bounty hunting, when the market for altcoins will be stable again, maybe we will see a number of members here who will choose to join bounties than pays in tokens based on stake than a bounty or a campaign that pays in BTC. What bounty hunters just like is to earn a big amount of reward, so they will also have to adjust.
Stake, or fixed bounty, are the same for me. I don't really care whether the allocation we get is calculated based on the allocation of token fixes, or based on stake because the most important thing for me is a good, reliable project.
I have followed the bounty several times with the fix allocation system, and the project ended in a scam. That certainly makes me disappointed, and I have also participated in several projects with a stake allocation system, and that also ended badly. The point is, whether it's stake or fixed allocation, as long as it is paid and gives good results, I will not complain
I have followed the bounty several times with the fix allocation system, and the project ended in a scam. That certainly makes me disappointed, and I have also participated in several projects with a stake allocation system, and that also ended badly. The point is, whether it's stake or fixed allocation, as long as it is paid and gives good results, I will not complain
So the only thing you are interested in is getting paid? And you don't care if you receive 10$ or 100$?
I prefer Fixed bounty allocation. Because from the beginning you can calculate how much you will receive. While in stake system, multi accounts can turn all your effort to 1$< in the end.
Bounty campaigns with fixed allocation are in most cases less profitable. It is due to low amount of participants in bounty campaigns. I remember when twitter campaigns had around 5000 participants, now most of them have around 200 participants. This makes stake bounty campaigns more profitable.
At least with fixed bounty allocation we know how much "money" we get at the end. Most of them give limitation bounty participant and if you think that not worth to join you can skip whenever you want.
yes of course, when some bounty campaign using stakes based allocation people who join in early time get more reward, and this is more interest than bounty campaign based on fixed allocation even they are giving $5M or more we still get fixed allocation and not have chance to earn more money 
Most of the time stakes allocations on bounties gives you a high percentage earning than the fixed one.
however if you joined some trash bounties that allocation is meaningless you will not gain anything.
so it's the same whether in stakes or fixed allocation if the bounty is bad the stakes are no good.
however if you joined some trash bounties that allocation is meaningless you will not gain anything.
so it's the same whether in stakes or fixed allocation if the bounty is bad the stakes are no good.
Stake, or fixed bounty, are the same for me. I don't really care whether the allocation we get is calculated based on the allocation of token fixes, or based on stake because the most important thing for me is a good, reliable project.
I have followed the bounty several times with the fix allocation system, and the project ended in a scam. That certainly makes me disappointed, and I have also participated in several projects with a stake allocation system, and that also ended badly. The point is, whether it's stake or fixed allocation, as long as it is paid and gives good results, I will not complain
I have followed the bounty several times with the fix allocation system, and the project ended in a scam. That certainly makes me disappointed, and I have also participated in several projects with a stake allocation system, and that also ended badly. The point is, whether it's stake or fixed allocation, as long as it is paid and gives good results, I will not complain
At least with fixed bounty allocation we know how much "money" we get at the end. Most of them give limitation bounty participant and if you think that not worth to join you can skip whenever you want.
Maybe what he meant was the total number of participants who took part in the campaign and that included an all-choice campaign, especially social media campaigns, where there were so many participants. In addition, what we are doing is promoting the product so that with many participants it is likely that the product will be read so that it will attract investors.
But even though many participants promoted up to 2000 participants if the project was not convincing it would not be successful, but hunters now know a lot which is better to join and promote it.
The capability of the project to become successful in order for the rewards paid out to bounty participants become worth the time and resources used is what matters most. Being a stake or fixed allocation does not have major impact on the project. A fixed bounty with limited participants is a good strategy to earn more of the bounty tokens because very limited bounty hunters who are lucky to join get to share the rewards however this is not an assurance to the success of the project.
With stake allocation you can get more tokens based on the stake and how many participants join the bounty but that's that, the reason why I choose fixed allocation over stake is because right from the start you've know how much tokens you will get and the fact is merely looking or comparing bounties from one to another fixed bounty allocation performs better,they pays most times and no single participants is left out,what do you guys say about this?
You will need to doing more calculation to know which one will more profiting.
The most important thing from stake based bounty is the number of participants,
because it will be more profiting if the campaign has limit for participants. It will be better to join fixed based reward campaign if there are too many participants.
If a bounty has more than 2000 participants in each campaign, stake based bounties are making no sense anymore, because everybody would get a tiny bit of tokens. In such cases fixed allocation with limited participation is much better.
i don't think, i'm prefer to join in bounty campaign with stakes based, because is fair, people who join in early time they get more rewards than people just joined in lately time.and the reward is based on our work, but like you said sometime people who not work got their reward and it's not fair
Fixed bounty allocation is better but problem is after distribution when price dump by bounty hunters. For this problem fixed bounty allocation is now below 1 percent. Weekly fixed rewards also good. Without project is getting success nothing is better.
yes, especially since the participants are limited, that's what makes me more interested in fixed allocations, so we can estimate the income we will get. It will be more profitable if the token is already listed in the market. But bounties like that are quite rare, as you mentioned.Well, fixed allocation and stake-based are both beneficial as long as we analyze them to the maximum, work according to rules, and be consistent. After that, good luck comes so the price matches expectations.
Jump to: