What screenshot would you want? The screenshot of the 2 void bets?
And is Stunna a person who works for Stake?
anything that shows that the issue actually happened. don't me wrong I am not trying to say that you are lying or anything. it's just that, having a screenshot proving the issue actually happened along with your scam accusation usually helps your case.
also, as stated above stunna is part of their team and is usually active here in the forum.
Okay here we go:
Here you can see I actually placed the 2 bets I mentioned and that they got void:
https://imgur.com/Ww4E5FNThis past night I was watching the MLB odds to get some proof together that the odds I bet on were actually quite normal for a tied game with the home team still half an inning to go. The exact same game was this night as well (Dodgers at home against the Angels) and as you can see the odds were very comparable. As you can see, in the break between bottom 7th, top 8th inning the odds were: 1.35 vs 3,30:
https://imgur.com/rtXYlGCThen after the Angels didn't score in their top of the 8th, and the Dodgers started the bottom of the 8th (screenshot taken a few seconds too late to catch the actual break between innings but you can see in the data that there are no men on base and no outs, so this is essentially the same as during the break. Dodgers are even bigger favourite here with 1.18 vs 5.10:
https://imgur.com/WtVFNmqUnfortunately the Dodgers scored 2 runs in the bottom of the 8th, so I could not take a screenshot of the odds in the break between top 9th and bottom 9th with a tied score, but I am 99% sure they would have been identical to the odds I bet on.....around 1,40 vs 3,10
Then I also took a screenshot of another comparable game. The favourite Padres at home against the Diamondbacks at a score of 2-2, with the Padres still half an inning more to go (break top 7th, bottom 7th) they also have comparable odds as the ones I took: 1.35 vs 3.35:
https://imgur.com/1yFYSLrAnd one inning earlier the odds were basically the same also: 1.35 vs 3.30 with the Padres still half an inning extra to go (break top 6th, bottom 6th):
https://imgur.com/JwdeyldAs you can see, it is basically always the same. If a pre-match home team which is a favourite still has an extra inning to go (which is the case when a top of an inning has been played but the bottom still to go) and the score is tied, you will always see odds around 1.30-1.35 for the home team. In the case of the Dodgers last night even 1.18 at some point. So the odds of 2.95 and 3.20 for the away team were definitely not wrong. If anything they were more too low than too high!
Tonight the Dodgers play the Angels again.....and guess what....odds are 1,29 vs 3,65 right now.....also very comparable again.
I will be watching MLB games closely again the upcoming days and if I find tied games of a pre-match favourite home team I will try to make more screenshots. But I can already guarantee they will look the same as the ones above.
Ofcourse I do understand that Stake does not make these odds themselves and they have an external party for that. But I do find they take the side of the provider way too easily without listening to the other side of the story. You know what I think: perhaps this live trader of the provider gets paid per profit per game and maybe he had a bad game and the underdog winning cost him his bonus or salary of the day. And he decided to just void some bets to make the stats of his trading look better.
Two things are for sure: 1) the odds were not frozen, they were moving in small increments in between 2,90 and 3,20 all the time in a time span of some minutes. So business as usual and no sign of anything wrong.
2) I was not trying to take advantage of wrong odds. If realized I was betting on wrong odds and wanted to profit from it I could have cashed out with a nice profit once the Angels survived the bottom of the 9th and started taking the lead in the 10th. But I didn't.
I truly hope someone at Stake can reply here. Even if the system cannot change the bet from void to won, you can still credit me the missing amounts in the form of a manual bonus. This is only fair. Because especially in live betting you have to be really really careful with voids, cause a bet is won or lost in a matter of minutes at that point. If you void a pre-match bet it's way less impactful as then there is no advantage or disadvantage yet and the user still has the chance to place the bet at another bookmaker, which is something I didn't have the chance for in this case.
In my opinion, voiding should be something really rare (one in 10.000 bets or so) and only to correct clearly wrong odds such a typo's or inversed odds.