I played dice, limbo and plinko and my bet amount was between $0.2-$0.5 only. When I played dice and limbo, I did not play it with 98% winning chance as per my experience it gives me faster bust than betting flat with 49.5%-80% winning chance. I dont like play flat betting with 98% winning chance because we need a hundred win streak to recover the lose. I played plinko at the same time in a hope to win bigger multiplier so I can recover the other but for sure plinko may give more loses when the luck is not in my side.
Well, I wanted to get my wagering stats up a bit to see if I can get some of the rain that are falling .....so I used the best strategy I knew.. which would be Dice with a 98% winning chance and I did 100 bets at a time to see what results I got. (You need to wager $4000 in 7 days and be active in the chat to qualify for the rain)
On several of the 100 bets.. I lost more than 10 bets out of the 100.
So, is this definitely 98% win chance..? I do not think so. I even swapped strategies to play some Plinko and Limbo in between, but the results were the same. (spend about $50 to qualify for 1 x $0.30 and 1 x $0.50 rain in 5 days)
I will try your strategy to see if I get better results, but I seriously doubt it.
. However, it will also be depending on our luck as we may wager more or wager less than the common calculation of the expected lose. If we start with $5 only, means we need to do small flat bet to avoid lose the all the $5 quickly. It is what happened with me during the past month where I wagered more than $50,000 (to reach plat 2) with around $250 deposit. Luckily I did not lose all my deposit when I finally ranked up to Plat 2. 
