Pages:
Author

Topic: Standard accounting procedure (Read 3038 times)

legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1001
October 04, 2012, 10:46:24 AM
#31
The best type of accounting is easy accounting.

The best type of account is accurate, not easy accounting  Wink

NO.

We should be using GAAP or IAS.

Coming up with our own standards will undoubtedly lead to confusion, scamming, and any number of other bad things.

Couldn't have said it better myself.

If you're new to account, take a look at these example financial sheets to get an idea of what it might look like. Organization is absolutely key in your statements.
legendary
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
Quality Printing Services by Federal Reserve Bank
October 04, 2012, 09:21:50 AM
#30
NO.

We should be using GAAP or IAS.

Coming up with our own standards will undoubtedly lead to confusion, scamming, and any number of other bad things.

+10

jborkl, thank you for starting this thread. Smiley
 
Representatives of different exchanges, we need to get you on board  here because the exchange is the only source of real trading activities etc. for managed funds/portfolios etc.


 
kjj
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1026
October 04, 2012, 01:29:41 AM
#29
Also, I very, very, very highly recommend that people stop referring to their fundraising efforts as "stocks", "shares", "bonds", etc.  If you are in the US and a judge decides that they really are stocks or bonds, you'll probably get fucked for violating SEC regulations.  And if the judge decides that they are not securities, you'll probably get fucked by the FTC for fraud.  Replace with other government agencies in other countries, of course.
kjj
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1026
October 04, 2012, 01:26:51 AM
#28
No need to reinvent the wheel here people.  Use GAAP.  It exists for a reason, and there's no reason it doesn't apply to business conducted using Bitcoins vs business conducted using other financial instruments.

The only item in your list that GAAP doesn't apply to is #2.  And to that, I really don't even understand what you are requesting.  Company funds are not to be mixed?  Mixed with what?  Why?

In the real world, mixing personal and corporate funds is called commingling.  It lands you in prison, typically.
If that's what he meant, then I agree, unless the person is on the sole-propriety level of business.  If they are actually incorporated, then yes, the funds absolutely need to be kept separately.  If they are a sole-proprietor or equivalent, they can mix their funds between business and personal.

Sole proprietor means that one person is doing it himself, there is no other entity to mix funds with.  There is no distinction between personal funds and company funds, because the person and the company are the same.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
October 03, 2012, 09:57:26 PM
#27
Who of all the assets currently follows GAAP?
Although I am not a CPA, I believe I have followed GAAP for GLBSE:MPOE.ETF and GLBSE:SS
Note however that MPOE.ETF is now winding down.

And all the other asset operators could learn much by looking at the way you present your reports.
donator
Activity: 151
Merit: 100
Assholier-than-thou retard magnet
October 03, 2012, 09:44:13 PM
#26
Who of all the assets currently follows GAAP?
Although I am not a CPA, I believe I have followed GAAP for GLBSE:MPOE.ETF and GLBSE:SS
Note however that MPOE.ETF is now winding down.

You're also one of the people about whom no one is worried. :-)  (Correlation?)
sr. member
Activity: 446
Merit: 250
October 03, 2012, 09:16:35 PM
#25
Who of all the assets currently follows GAAP?
Although I am not a CPA, I believe I have followed GAAP for GLBSE:MPOE.ETF and GLBSE:SS
Note however that MPOE.ETF is now winding down.
donator
Activity: 151
Merit: 100
Assholier-than-thou retard magnet
October 03, 2012, 08:59:51 PM
#24
None that I see.

I am not asking for gaap, because I don't think its realistic. It varies even from cpa to cpa and state to state to a slight degree.

Real world accounting and proof of work.

Let's start somewhere.

Income
Expenses
Proof of work
Seperate bank account (not so hard on bitcoin, takes like 1 second to make a wallet?)



I'm less concerned about the native btc transactions than the recognition of value when btc must be converted to fiat for expenses.  "FIAT/GOX on date due" is not helpful, given that this forces the asset manager to accept the risk of valuation fluctuation and unrealized gains and losses since GOXUSD or whatever does not transfer immediately.
sr. member
Activity: 246
Merit: 250
Team Heritage Motorsports
October 03, 2012, 08:41:55 PM
#23
None that I see.

I am not asking for gaap, because I don't think its realistic. It varies even from cpa to cpa and state to state to a slight degree.

Real world accounting and proof of work.

Let's start somewhere.

Income
Expenses
Proof of work
Seperate bank account (not so hard on bitcoin, takes like 1 second to make a wallet?)

donator
Activity: 151
Merit: 100
Assholier-than-thou retard magnet
October 03, 2012, 08:39:38 PM
#22
I haven't kept up with the IFRS changes to IAS 39 regarding fair value for non-currency financial instruments.  Anyone have expertise in this area as I suspect it's more universally applicable than GAAP since all the "exchanges" are not in the USA at this time.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
October 03, 2012, 08:25:41 PM
#21
Who of all the assets currently follows GAAP?
sr. member
Activity: 246
Merit: 250
Team Heritage Motorsports
October 03, 2012, 08:14:02 PM
#20
It is a call to action then

When a exchange listed fund can pass a simple group audit and it makes sense I will invest.

Basic common sense accounting and proof of work.

If someone wanted to do it right, it should be a normal part of business anyway.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
October 03, 2012, 07:42:24 PM
#19
NO.

We should be using GAAP or IAS.

Coming up with our own standards will undoubtedly lead to confusion, scamming, and any number of other bad things.

Well stated.
sr. member
Activity: 446
Merit: 250
October 03, 2012, 06:40:26 PM
#18
NO.

We should be using GAAP or IAS.

Coming up with our own standards will undoubtedly lead to confusion, scamming, and any number of other bad things.
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1005
October 03, 2012, 06:34:27 PM
#17
We are getting somewhere here--

The point is we are supposed to be a self regulated community. If someone wants to be taken serious, they should have to submit to some simple community auditing and regulation.

This will reduce scams, increase profit and therefore increase the future value of Bitcoin
Yes, I agree.  I would be very unlikely to invest in a company that is not holding to GAAP standards and is not being regularly audited, or at least very transparent with their reporting.  Unfortunately, most of the community does not hold to those sorts of standards, thus the companies do not feel the need to conform to GAAP or audit requests.  If this thread is a call to action for investors to demand more transparency in these areas from companies prior to investing in them, then I wholeheartedly agree.  Not much can be done besides just talking about it, but hopefully even that will make progress in this area.

The cashflow report should list that in detail.
It is a mandatory part of accounting.

I think you are afraid, that an operator could manipulate USD/BTC to his advantage.

An operator should write his invoices in USD, e.g. if he paid for the electricity in USD.
The company then will compensate him in USD if it has still reserves.
If not the company can convert BTCs into USD and pay out.

If the operating costs are charged on a regular - predetermined date/time, it would also be possible to pay out BTC with a reasonable exchange rate like MtGox/USD from the predetermined date/time.

But that would only be a best practice, I'm not sure if it is reasonable to regulate this so much in detail.
I am not terribly familiar with GAAP in regards to foreign currency, but what you just described doesn't sound like GAAP at all.  I would expect revenues/expenses to be recorded in the base currency (i.e., USD) at the time that the revenue/expense is incurred.  Any further fluctuations between the time that the revenue/expense is incurred and the time that the exchange is actually made to/from the base currency would be accounted for separately, as something like a gain/loss on currency conversion.
sr. member
Activity: 246
Merit: 250
Team Heritage Motorsports
October 03, 2012, 04:19:14 PM
#16
I did mean personal and company funds need to be separate.

Being on a exchange means public company to me, so funds need to kept apart.


If hardware is paid for in USD or expenses incurred in USD then a exchange rate needs to accounted for at the time the expense is incurred.

$80 electric bill being paid for by shareholder operating expenses needs to be $80/Gox last at the time of the bill

If expenses are in Yen, then Yen/GOX.

A mining company should have to report operating equipment and the hash rate it operates at.

What if someone says 100 ghash farm but they are only outputting 80 ghash?

That is not a viable business, that is taking money from the future to pay dividends today.

It is very easy to show what your output is
Yes, I agree.  I suppose I should have just continued with the implied assumption of the conversation being about companies with shareholders.

Regardless, the currency conversion things you mentioned are covered by GAAP.  Companies (even Bitcoin-based ones) should follow GAAP, and shareholders should demand GAAP compliance by companies before investing in them.

Shareholder should also demand transparency (i.e., visibility of hashing power).  Real-world companies misrepresent their actual production figures all the time, and they are kept in check via independent auditors.  Therefore, shareholders of Bitcoin-based companies should demand either periodical independent auditing or reliable ways of verifying that the company is actually producing what it says it is producing.

We are getting somewhere here--

The point is we are supposed to be a self regulated community. If someone wants to be taken serious, they should have to submit to some simple community auditing and regulation.

This will reduce scams, increase profit and therefore increase the future value of Bitcoin
sr. member
Activity: 246
Merit: 250
Team Heritage Motorsports
October 03, 2012, 04:15:58 PM
#15
If hardware is paid for in USD or expenses incurred in USD then a exchange rate needs to accounted for at the time the expense is incurred.
The expense is incurring with depreciation!
There is a cashflow, but that is not an expense!
But that should be easy. When you convert BTC into a fiat on an exchange, you automatically have an exchange rate.

Correct, but what shareholder protection is there in the current system?

Since the exchange rate is variable, what exchange rate is being used- if not specifically stated?

How many dollars did the company get for our Bitcoins?  This is a very big question if a large number of Bitcoins is involved.

1000X11.50? or 1000x12.80?

legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1005
October 03, 2012, 04:13:22 PM
#14
I did mean personal and company funds need to be separate.

Being on a exchange means public company to me, so funds need to kept apart.


If hardware is paid for in USD or expenses incurred in USD then a exchange rate needs to accounted for at the time the expense is incurred.

$80 electric bill being paid for by shareholder operating expenses needs to be $80/Gox last at the time of the bill

If expenses are in Yen, then Yen/GOX.

A mining company should have to report operating equipment and the hash rate it operates at.

What if someone says 100 ghash farm but they are only outputting 80 ghash?

That is not a viable business, that is taking money from the future to pay dividends today.

It is very easy to show what your output is
Yes, I agree.  I suppose I should have just continued with the implied assumption of the conversation being about companies with shareholders.

Regardless, the currency conversion things you mentioned are covered by GAAP.  Companies (even Bitcoin-based ones) should follow GAAP, and shareholders should demand GAAP compliance by companies before investing in them.

Shareholder should also demand transparency (i.e., visibility of hashing power).  Real-world companies misrepresent their actual production figures all the time, and they are kept in check via independent auditors.  Therefore, shareholders of Bitcoin-based companies should demand either periodical independent auditing or reliable ways of verifying that the company is actually producing what it says it is producing.
sr. member
Activity: 246
Merit: 250
Team Heritage Motorsports
October 03, 2012, 04:10:38 PM
#13
Simple screenshot from a pool.

Last 10 rounds

Payout screen

Transactions coming into the company account matching the transaction out from the pool.

I can think of many ways to prove output beyond a reasonable doubt.

hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
October 03, 2012, 04:05:46 PM
#12
A mining company should have to report operating equipment and the hash rate it operates at.

What if someone says 100 ghash farm but they are only outputting 80 ghash?

That is not a viable business, that is taking money from the future to pay dividends today.

It is very easy to show what your output is

If they say they produce 100 ghash and only actually produce 80, then that would be lying. I am not sure how to stop lying? How do you show what your output is to prove it?
Pages:
Jump to: