Hm... i only now, when you mentioned this, realized that toomim brothers are a competitor of AsicSpace. Even though the investigation sounds trustworthy... this can hardly be seen as an independent investigation then. I thought they are hardware nerds who can check those things out. But letting the competitor decide if the competition made an error is not really something that comes to mind when one wants an independent investigation about the source of the problems. I dont say anything, i only point out a conflict of interests.
Yes, I have a conflict of interest. Sorry if that wasn't very clear. I'll edit a note of that into my initial analysis.
Edit: It's also worth mentioning that I used to be business partners with Robert and Damir, and my brother and I originally planned to design and fund most of their datacenter for them in exchange for free hosting for our SP30s and partial ownership of the business. My brother and I decided that we did not want to be involved with them (mostly because of Damir), so we broke off and forged on our own. They claim we acted inappropriately and dishonestly, and that our original intent was just to deceive them and use them to find a location to build our own facility. I claim that they were not competent enough to continue collaboration with, and that we didn't realize this until after we were heavily involved with them.
You can read about that history
here.
Interesting, it is good to finally know the rest of the story. Edit- Hmm, found more info I didn't know. Removed negative comment.
truer words have never been spoken. You always come up with the most ridiculous claims and the request for a observatory stance like this is Kindergarten.
Yes, being an asshole to longtime highly trusted members of the community is going to go REALLY well for your war on Asicspace.
Fuck this. Damage has been done, ASICCRAP is not paying up and customers of theirs are not getting reimbursed for the damage.
You might want to review your hosting agreement with Toomim. No hosting company anywhere is going to reimburse customers for miners(according to the contract). They can't. The margins are too slim, and there's too many things that can possibly go wrong with miners, many of which(not all, and not necessarily in this case) aren't under the control of the hoster. Some may reimburse in some situations, but it won't be a standard thing except perhaps with the highest cost providers(at a net loss to their customer base).
For all your kicking and screaming, if you take this to court, you will almost certainly lose.
So your intent as you have made clear is to make Asicspace suffer economically. Might I suggest that if you really want to tarnish Asicspace's reputation, being an asshole about it will only make people doubt your statements? Or did you not notice Toomim's statements, being a stand-up guy(respect): "When I was at ASICSPACE earlier today, the conditions were considerably improved." Are you going to rant and rage at toomim now for saying something positive like you did to SebastianJU for saying something neutral?
For now, you got to live with what is on the table and you either take that or you don't.
Hmm....