I'm sorry, this is all bizarre logic. So if the forum gets hacked, individual users are responsible for the hacker's actions? Why should the victim be responsible for damages just because the perpetrator isn't known? Why not hold theymos responsible while you're at it?
Having said that, I don't usually buy the "I got hacked!" routine. The whole Master-P debacle soured me on that, but there have been so many other examples too.
It could be hard to believe for many, but I never stole the cards. Get any real investigation you can, I will bet my money on it.
I have been here for years and will never do this. This is not my game. I also understand what John is going through, but giving $160 is too much.
Most of these Kohl's offers have been linked to fraud.
These are 100% fraud cards.
I entirely agree. Each and every user is responsible for taking the necessary precautions to secure their account. They are also entirely responsible for any illicit activity from their "compromised" account. If this was not the standard, we would have hundreds of users claiming they were "hacked" to steal from users on a weekly basis.
I agree to some extent, but you should always try to
play safe and small. Never trade huge amounts right away.
Now what if I show fake paypal transaction proving I sent the funds to John (fake PP account and everything). Would you guys have believed on that? Come on, think again !
Uhm yeah. I might have negative trust but that doesn't mean I can't add people to my own scammer database. 
