Topic: Stop blaming bounty hunters (Read 1249 times)
Yea they really blame the hunters for the dump of the price. I don't know why but the allocation for bounty is just a little. Hunters are not causing for the dump how about the early investors which has a big bonus or the team that has billion of supply?..
yes, I agree with you, often the bounty hunter is accused of being a major factor in token dumps but many things can happen. such as investors who throw away their tokens very cheaply or teams that throw them away. but it is always the bounty hunter that is blamed.
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 1028
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
accused accusing it of being a normal thing, now we are talking about facts on the ground if the allocation given to the prize hunter is around 3% how it can affect the price of coins, the cause of all that is investors who hold large funds.
3% will really be a lot for the first phase of the project. Usually they will list at small exchanges in the first phase and those exchanges will not have too much liquidity. And if all bounty hunters sell their tokens, it will cause a serious collapse
accused accusing it of being a normal thing, now we are talking about facts on the ground if the allocation given to the prize hunter is around 3% how it can affect the price of coins, the cause of all that is investors who hold large funds.
3% will really be a lot for the first phase of the project. Usually they will list at small exchanges in the first phase and those exchanges will not have too much liquidity. And if all bounty hunters sell their tokens, it will cause a serious collapse 
The crypto space has experienced so many bullies, and it has been mostly attributed to bounty hunters. Whenever there is a dump; people raise fingers, and attack hunters as the cause of the dumps.
But when you consider most recently hybrix token; the investors got their dividends, and they boldly dumped the token from 3.5$ to 0.5$.
This reinforce claims that no matter how much bounty hunters earn; it is not enough to close down the trade market of crypto coins.
Project team can avoid this if they want, why give out all tokens in the first place if they know that bounty hunters will dump?? They can do the followingBut when you consider most recently hybrix token; the investors got their dividends, and they boldly dumped the token from 3.5$ to 0.5$.
This reinforce claims that no matter how much bounty hunters earn; it is not enough to close down the trade market of crypto coins.
1. Give out limited tokens only, many new projects are giving out 30k to 50k worth of tokens today
2. Send out bounty hunters rewards in batches
3. There is also locks that works for past bounty campaigns
If all 3 steps will be used in bounty campaign, only bots and multyaccounts will join it. Not a single normal bounty hunter wont join a campaign, that has locked altcoins.
What is the purpose of joining, when your earnings are locked? It is like working as a manufacturing, and your salary will only be when the product is sold
The crypto space has experienced so many bullies, and it has been mostly attributed to bounty hunters. Whenever there is a dump; people raise fingers, and attack hunters as the cause of the dumps.
But when you consider most recently hybrix token; the investors got their dividends, and they boldly dumped the token from 3.5$ to 0.5$.
This reinforce claims that no matter how much bounty hunters earn; it is not enough to close down the trade market of crypto coins.
Project team can avoid this if they want, why give out all tokens in the first place if they know that bounty hunters will dump?? They can do the followingBut when you consider most recently hybrix token; the investors got their dividends, and they boldly dumped the token from 3.5$ to 0.5$.
This reinforce claims that no matter how much bounty hunters earn; it is not enough to close down the trade market of crypto coins.
1. Give out limited tokens only, many new projects are giving out 30k to 50k worth of tokens today
2. Send out bounty hunters rewards in batches
3. There is also locks that works for past bounty campaigns
accused accusing it of being a normal thing, now we are talking about facts on the ground if the allocation given to the prize hunter is around 3% how it can affect the price of coins, the cause of all that is investors who hold large funds.
The crypto space has experienced so many bullies, and it has been mostly attributed to bounty hunters. Whenever there is a dump; people raise fingers, and attack hunters as the cause of the dumps.
But when you consider most recently hybrix token; the investors got their dividends, and they boldly dumped the token from 3.5$ to 0.5$.
This reinforce claims that no matter how much bounty hunters earn; it is not enough to close down the trade market of crypto coins.
Yes. bounty hunters like us are marginalized. Although it only accounts for 0.5% - 1% of the total supply, people are still cursed for making the price of tokens plummet. Meanwhile, investors accounted for more than 50% of the total token supply and they are the fastest sellers. bounty hunters are sometimes delayed and don't have the opportunity to sell at a high price. I was really angry when I felt like I was being suppressed and I had no voice. But when you consider most recently hybrix token; the investors got their dividends, and they boldly dumped the token from 3.5$ to 0.5$.
This reinforce claims that no matter how much bounty hunters earn; it is not enough to close down the trade market of crypto coins.
not all mistakes must be pointed out to bounty hunters, when the token/coin starts to be distributed to bounty hunters, investors sometimes panic to sell their tokens for fear of being dumped by bounty hunters, sometimes we don't have to blame one side.
but how will the investors know that ? investors normally buy and go . they will only comeback soon after a long time to see if thier investments have grown or not . their chose project wont also discussed it to them ( i havent seen one tho ) . mostly whats written on thier roadmap are the core plans only and not the schedule of the payments or if they will conduct a bounty . if ever im one of the investor , i will not leave my assets and i will infact monitor it and still acess this forum but i won sell my assets just because of bounty hunters because i believe on the assets that im investing with
not all mistakes must be pointed out to bounty hunters, when the token/coin starts to be distributed to bounty hunters, investors sometimes panic to sell their tokens for fear of being dumped by bounty hunters, sometimes we don't have to blame one side.
Big mistake not from bounty campaign participants but also come from bounty campaign manager, we always trusted with experience bounty campaign manager because they have good ICO coin for promoting but when getting bad ICO I think fault by bounty campaign manager, how ever they give wrong information about some coin project must joining and allow for promoting.
Stop blaming us, we are just bounty hunters. I think the project token will have a good price if the project has big goals or plans and the project team does a great job! It all depends on the ability of the team. Prize hunters just jump around on a project to make a profit. Not those who follow the project like investors or long-term shareholders! Therefore, stop blaming us.
You are right The hunters are not the true source of dumbing there are many other factors involved as some whales want to buy the coin at a low price or some time market sudden crash etc.
Bounty hunters selling off their tokens once trading starts will dump a coin value, there is different between gradual sell off and instant sell off, if the tokens are many it will surely have negative impact on the value but this isn't enough to ruin a project unless the project is already a bad one.
the cause of dumping by prize hunters is only 3-5% because the allocation given to prize hunters is around 1-5%, so I think it has a big effect on coins when dump, maybe because the bonus is too big given to investors so they sell it when it already exists profit.
Yeah, but people would rather break the bounty hunter than their own team. however, all of these ideas originated from his team, so they need to do something so the coins don't dump badly. however, we have realized this a long time ago, but because the dump moment always coincides with the distribution of bounties, the bounty hunter is the main actor in the dumping problem. 
not something new if the bounty hunter is accused of causing dumps in the market, except when there is a dump before the hunter distribution then the hunter will not be blamed. the investor who has full control over the dump is because they sell all the bonuses they get.
The crypto space has experienced so many bullies, and it has been mostly attributed to bounty hunters. Whenever there is a dump; people raise fingers, and attack hunters as the cause of the dumps.
But when you consider most recently hybrix token; the investors got their dividends, and they boldly dumped the token from 3.5$ to 0.5$.
This reinforce claims that no matter how much bounty hunters earn; it is not enough to close down the trade market of crypto coins.
But when you consider most recently hybrix token; the investors got their dividends, and they boldly dumped the token from 3.5$ to 0.5$.
This reinforce claims that no matter how much bounty hunters earn; it is not enough to close down the trade market of crypto coins.
My oponion if that real good project abaout matter components of such things are already in their count without blaming anyone such as the bounthy hunter, example when the price Dump ( in a certain condition) so that the target achievement of a project is maximal. That meaning that if the project is brought up with a mature concept the results are also maximum.
indeed the bounty hunter is not a dump! Coins from projects that are not clear will experience dumps that are common. The team should know that bounty hunters will dump their coins for $, they are ready to pay that's why they introduce bounty promotions right ? Then why blaming bounty hunters? It mean the projects are not good enough, look at many projects that paid this year, they still have good value, tokens that bounty hunters sold have no impact on the price. Cartesi even though tokens are distributed the price of CTSI is still good at binance
Ups and downs are the common scenario for any market. No marker goes in a straight line. There has a maximum and minimum point, between them the market trends fluctuate. In the open market system, market controls itself. No single buyer and seller can control its trend. So the fluctuation in crypto market is also the result of common market mechanism. But when a lots of bounty hunters enter into the market at a time, it some what affects the market but not the real cause for dump.
The crypto space has experienced so many bullies, and it has been mostly attributed to bounty hunters. Whenever there is a dump; people raise fingers, and attack hunters as the cause of the dumps.
But when you consider most recently hybrix token; the investors got their dividends, and they boldly dumped the token from 3.5$ to 0.5$.
This reinforce claims that no matter how much bounty hunters earn; it is not enough to close down the trade market of crypto coins.
Most of the investors blame the bounty hunter which hold the 10% -20% token allocationBut when you consider most recently hybrix token; the investors got their dividends, and they boldly dumped the token from 3.5$ to 0.5$.
This reinforce claims that no matter how much bounty hunters earn; it is not enough to close down the trade market of crypto coins.
But the main issue or root of the dump are the big holder which he can manipulate the price of coin because he can gather all the starting dump price by the bounty hunter and use them to take a risk in selling them in cheap to which it will make the coin go lower and if lucky the huge holder will slowly rise the price of the coin
Jump to: