in my opinion you are too hard on what people say. being "stable" doesn't mean it is always going to be stable. but it is currently stable. which is the same as having low volatility at the moment but that doesn't mean bitcoin stopped being volatile.
this is a trend before the rise begins.
Topic: Stop calling Bitcoin ''stable'' it's not. - page 10. (Read 1945 times)
When I say it has 'increased stability' I used the word stable, but that doesn't mean it is stable.
Fiat currency are also not stable but have 'increased stability' when compared to Bitcoin.
Less volatility means more stability'.
It's like saying, this bomb is stable because it hasn't exploded yet.
Or saying the bomb has exploded and the dust is now settling down (preparing for another explosion, maybe)
Fiat currency are also not stable but have 'increased stability' when compared to Bitcoin.
Less volatility means more stability'.
It's like saying, this bomb is stable because it hasn't exploded yet.
Or saying the bomb has exploded and the dust is now settling down (preparing for another explosion, maybe)
why would we want it stable when it's so under valued currently 
Low volatility doesn't mean stable. Bitcoin has experienced periods of low volatility many times, however this doesn't mean bitcoin is stable, not even close. We all know it doesn't take much for bitcoin to explode, either up or down. That's absolutely still in the cards, I mean everyone is waiting for the next bull run and some people are waiting for a big crash.
It's like saying, this bomb is stable because it hasn't exploded yet.
It's like saying, this bomb is stable because it hasn't exploded yet.
Jump to: