Topic: STOP COINVALIDATION. (Read 3126 times)
can confirm this screenie is legit, their site exposed their dev environment.
You submit your private keys to CoinValidation and they remove coins from unvalidated addresses and escrows them until the sender validates, automatic in the case you use coinbase.
LOL I you sooo stupid to do it you deserve to lose all you bitcoin one more scam nothing more.... You submit your private keys to CoinValidation and they remove coins from unvalidated addresses and escrows them until the sender validates, automatic in the case you use coinbase.
This is sick. 
So , nobody even considers that this is
FAKE?
FAKE?
It might be. What does it matter? It doesn't make CoinValidation a good idea.
It got a few more people nicely talking about it at least, as needs to happen -- otherwise the first you'd know about it will be the tablet being handed down by the foundation, new commandment etched in the stone...
So , nobody even considers that this is
FAKE?
FAKE?
It might be. What does it matter? It doesn't make CoinValidation a good idea.
So , nobody even considers that this is
FAKE?
FAKE?
What is this zero coin that's being talked about? First I ever hear of it? What will it do to the bitcoin? I am sort of at a loss o_0
Zerocoin is a potential protocol addition for Bitcoin that could anonymize your coins in the most literal of senses. It uses the concept of a zero-knowledge proof of set membership to essentially turn Bitcoins into "Zerocoins" that are indistinguishable from one another. This is different than other privacy enhancers like CoinJoin and CoinSwap that merely increase the complexity of analyzing the transaction history of Bitcoin. It was rejected when first introduced due to being too larger to implement in the blockchain. Now the creators are claiming that they've reduced the size needed by 98% and are going to turn it into its own cryptocurrency. If you care about Bitcoin's future then it's a situation to watch. If the claims of Zerocoin's creators materialize then it's going to be pretty urgent for Bitcoin's future that it implement the technology itself.
It's important to note that it's purely optional too. It wouldn't "do" anything to your existing Bitcoins unless you wanted it to.
What is this zero coin that's being talked about? First I ever hear of it? What will it do to the bitcoin? I am sort of at a loss o_0
stop asking the foundation to solve development issues.
Wasn't foundation created to solve development issues?
They took Gavin abroad for that.
stop asking the foundation to solve development issues.
http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/bitcoin-dark-wallet
http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/bitcoin-dark-wallet
CoInvalidation. Nuff Said.
User with bad rep , posting a screenshot , missing link ....lols?
the worst thing is no hard fork is needed.
...
I'd like to see it kill Litecoin, maybe.
I'd like to see it kill Litecoin, maybe.
For what reason would it stop at Litecoin?
-- I try not to make predictions, especially about the future.
I'll give you a prediction. If Zerocoin truly does launch as a usable system then it will be to Bitcoin what Bitcoin was to the dollar. If interest in Zerocoin doesn't improve then I guess the community will just have to learn the hard way.
...
I'd like to see it kill Litecoin, maybe.
I'd like to see it kill Litecoin, maybe.
For what reason would it stop at Litecoin?
-- I try not to make predictions, especially about the future.
From Bitcoin Foundation:
Quote from this article: http://www.coindesk.com/whether-bitcoin-needs-regulators-going-regulate/
And then, of course, there’s the idea of tying bitcoin addresses to identities, as proposed by Coin Validation. The Foundation itself is unimpressed with the whole idea of making coins more identifiable.
“The Bitcoin Foundation does not support the use of money for identity tracking,” said spokesperson Jinyoung Englund this morning, hours before the Senate hearing started.
Quote from this article: http://www.coindesk.com/whether-bitcoin-needs-regulators-going-regulate/
And then, of course, there’s the idea of tying bitcoin addresses to identities, as proposed by Coin Validation. The Foundation itself is unimpressed with the whole idea of making coins more identifiable.
“The Bitcoin Foundation does not support the use of money for identity tracking,” said spokesperson Jinyoung Englund this morning, hours before the Senate hearing started.
I'd kinda like to see it make a play for its own share of the market...
So you'd like to see a competitor kill Bitcoin?
I'd like to see it kill Litecoin, maybe.
For what reason would it stop at Litecoin?
Is there an official statement from the Bitcoin Foundation on this specific issue? I would like to see it.
Mike Hearn discussion on Reddit:
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1qmbtu/mike_hearn_chair_of_the_bitcoin_foundations_law/
Good article by @dannybradbury:
http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-tracking-proposal-divides-bitcoin-community/
I'd kinda like to see it make a play for its own share of the market...
So you'd like to see a competitor kill Bitcoin?
I'd like to see it kill Litecoin, maybe.
I'd kinda like to see it make a play for its own share of the market...
So you'd like to see a competitor kill Bitcoin?
Jump to: