https://ore-mine.org/index.html
Waiting for comment from persons that let this camaign exist without negativ trust.
Edit:
Mostly from "shorena". Don't expect, but will be nice. Thanks.
Topic: Stop Neg-Tagging For Ponzi In a PAID Signature. (Read 3219 times)
-snip-
It is correct, but I'm afraid that this is working only by now. With time there will be farm of Full, Senior accounts with negative trust and will rise red trust sig campaign plague.. Hopefully not.
No worries It is correct, but I'm afraid that this is working only by now. With time there will be farm of Full, Senior accounts with negative trust and will rise red trust sig campaign plague.. Hopefully not.
The ponzies we neg-tag today won't live long enough to see any of their advertisers turn Full Member or higher.
Don't forget, that usually scammers don't stop on one ponzi project. They open new scam every week/month (same persons). They have to change script and website, but they can use same bitcointalk accounts everytime.. Just saying.
-snip-
It is correct, but I'm afraid that this is working only by now. With time there will be farm of Full, Senior accounts with negative trust and will rise red trust sig campaign plague.. Hopefully not.
No worries It is correct, but I'm afraid that this is working only by now. With time there will be farm of Full, Senior accounts with negative trust and will rise red trust sig campaign plague.. Hopefully not.
The ponzies we neg-tag today won't live long enough to see any of their advertisers turn Full Member or higher.
Well they deserve to get tagged if they own a ponzi website. They are clearly Scammers who won't pay out.
It is correct, but I'm afraid that this is working only by now. With time there will be farm of Full, Senior accounts with negative trust and will rise red trust sig campaign plague.. Hopefully not.
The only people joining the campaign are mostly throwaway accounts, the Jr. member accounts that sell for 0.003 each. They'll most likely just take the advance payment never to return 
-snip-
It is correct, but I'm afraid that this is working only by now. With time there will be farm of Full, Senior accounts with negative trust and will rise red trust sig campaign plague.. Hopefully not.
No worries It is correct, but I'm afraid that this is working only by now. With time there will be farm of Full, Senior accounts with negative trust and will rise red trust sig campaign plague.. Hopefully not.
The ponzies we neg-tag today won't live long enough to see any of their advertisers turn Full Member or higher.
Do you still belive that warning users with negative trust that they will get negative trust will work?
YepBut.. We can't do nothing more.
Accepting it, is the first step to avoid making unnecessary drama in bitcointalkAnd we will give those farmed junior accounts neg trust, not only for the reason that they have to be tagged accordingly, but also to keep higher value accounts from joining those campaigns.
We see very few Full/Senior Members, and absolutely none higher, to join those ponzi campaigns. That's one thing those neg-tags have achieved.
Those campaigns only get advertised with member signatures or lower, which are far less flashy than the signatures in higher groups.
It is correct, but I'm afraid that this is working only by now. With time there will be farm of Full, Senior accounts with negative trust and will rise red trust sig campaign plague.. Hopefully not.
Do you still belive that warning users with negative trust that they will get negative trust will work?
YepBut.. We can't do nothing more.
Accepting it, is the first step to avoid making unnecessary drama in bitcointalkAnd we will give those farmed junior accounts neg trust, not only for the reason that they have to be tagged accordingly, but also to keep higher value accounts from joining those campaigns.
We see very few Full/Senior Members, and absolutely none higher, to join those ponzi campaigns. That's one thing those neg-tags have achieved.
Those campaigns only get advertised with member signatures or lower, which are far less flashy than the signatures in higher groups.
Do you still belive that warning users with negative trust that they will get negative trust will work?
YepBut.. We can't do nothing more.
Accepting it, is the first step to avoid making unnecessary drama in bitcointalkFor scammers is easy to make 10 or more accounts and spam around. Giving them negative trust changing nothing. But, what I know..
Do you still belive that warning users with negative trust that they will get negative trust will work?
YepBut.. We can't do nothing more.
Accepting it, is the first step to avoid making unnecessary drama in bitcointalk It looks like sh*t is in the fan:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/doublebot-signature-campaign-best-site-to-invest-1329156
They are getting tagged too, Ecua and sho have been informed of the threadhttps://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/doublebot-signature-campaign-best-site-to-invest-1329156
Do you still belive that warning users with negative trust that they will get negative trust will work?
It looks like sh*t is in the fan:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/doublebot-signature-campaign-best-site-to-invest-1329156
They are getting tagged too, Ecua and sho have been informed of the thread https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/doublebot-signature-campaign-best-site-to-invest-1329156
Everything what you wrote is very nice but now check this thread and look what is going on:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/12dailycoincom-signature-campaign-best-rates-jr-member-staff-open-1322129
People with negative trust are joining this campaign and they don't care.
What then? Only deleting thread by Admins can help. Why they don't do that? Because there is no proof of scam i guess..
I dint notice that campaign but thanks for letting me know. It's sad to see that so many members just don't care about scammers and just care about few bitcoins.
There is obvious proof that the site is a scam and if admins can't take a strict against against these ponzis, then it's best the members do get a negative trust only as they deserve it for knowingly helping scammers. Although, I don's see this working because Jr. Members don't care for their reputation and they must be having alt accounts which should be detected and negated as well.
I'm pretty sure that only negative trust rating will not stop ponzi storm.. But.. We can't do nothing more.
It looks like sh*t is in the fan:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/doublebot-signature-campaign-best-site-to-invest-1329156
People here don't care whether one of their community members get scammed through the ponzi ad they are having in their signature spot. They just care about the earnings.
And those who don't join aren't any better. When you ask them what the reason is for not joining such a signature campaign. Answer. : I don't want to get negative trust. This once again shows no interest in the people that might potentially get scammed. They only care about themselfs.
Then again, as long as the forum allows these ponzi scams to exist, there is not much you can do.
This is a forum based on money, after all, so what do you expect?And those who don't join aren't any better. When you ask them what the reason is for not joining such a signature campaign. Answer. : I don't want to get negative trust. This once again shows no interest in the people that might potentially get scammed. They only care about themselfs.
Then again, as long as the forum allows these ponzi scams to exist, there is not much you can do.
I don't care either way if these Ponzi sig-promoters get negative trust or not. People should be able to decide very quickly if something like that is a scam and I'd say most of them are very obvious just based on promised returns. I'm not necessarily for the tagging of this sort of thing but I won't shed a tear either.
Having said this, if Yobit ever starts pulling a Gox I will most certainly ditch the campaign.
Everything what you wrote is very nice but now check this thread and look what is going on:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/12dailycoincom-signature-campaign-best-rates-jr-member-staff-open-1322129
People with negative trust are joining this campaign and they don't care.
What then? Only deleting thread by Admins can help. Why they don't do that? Because there is no proof of scam i guess..
I dint notice that campaign but thanks for letting me know. It's sad to see that so many members just don't care about scammers and just care about few bitcoins.
There is obvious proof that the site is a scam and if admins can't take a strict against against these ponzis, then it's best the members do get a negative trust only as they deserve it for knowingly helping scammers. Although, I don's see this working because Jr. Members don't care for their reputation and they must be having alt accounts which should be detected and negated as well.
I'm pretty sure that only negative trust rating will not stop ponzi storm.. But.. We can't do nothing more.
Everything what you wrote is very nice but now check this thread and look what is going on:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/12dailycoincom-signature-campaign-best-rates-jr-member-staff-open-1322129
People with negative trust are joining this campaign and they don't care.
What then? Only deleting thread by Admins can help. Why they don't do that? Because there is no proof of scam i guess..
I dint notice that campaign but thanks for letting me know. It's sad to see that so many members just don't care about scammers and just care about few bitcoins.
There is obvious proof that the site is a scam and if admins can't take a strict against against these ponzis, then it's best the members do get a negative trust only as they deserve it for knowingly helping scammers. Although, I don's see this working because Jr. Members don't care for their reputation and they must be having alt accounts which should be detected and negated as well.
I agree with the reasoning of the DT members who leave negative trust ratings for members who promote scam websites in their signatures. They also remove the ratings if the user/s stop promoting those websites and there should not be any reason except earning few bitcoins for wearing those signatures.
1. Promoting a website/company that's a fraud one is as good as being a part of their scam and agreeing with it.
2. The bitcoins one earns for promoting these websites is the money earned by scamming other users.
3. One is encouraging scams and by not participating in such campaigns, these campaigns would stop their scam on the forum.
4. Ponzi websites are 99% scam and they dont give the users the amount they have promised to give. If they manage to explain the DT member/s of how they promise to give the returns to the users, they wont be terms as scam then.
Also, it's high time the forum admins also try to stop the scamming on this forum. Though they have not implemented such rules, there is no need to let these KNOWN scam websites to operate on this forum. With the result, these scam websites would not be eligible to have campaigns here and users wont fall for their promotional benefits.
1. Promoting a website/company that's a fraud one is as good as being a part of their scam and agreeing with it.
2. The bitcoins one earns for promoting these websites is the money earned by scamming other users.
3. One is encouraging scams and by not participating in such campaigns, these campaigns would stop their scam on the forum.
4. Ponzi websites are 99% scam and they dont give the users the amount they have promised to give. If they manage to explain the DT member/s of how they promise to give the returns to the users, they wont be terms as scam then.
Also, it's high time the forum admins also try to stop the scamming on this forum. Though they have not implemented such rules, there is no need to let these KNOWN scam websites to operate on this forum. With the result, these scam websites would not be eligible to have campaigns here and users wont fall for their promotional benefits.
Everything what you wrote is very nice but now check this thread and look what is going on:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/12dailycoincom-signature-campaign-best-rates-jr-member-staff-open-1322129
People with negative trust are joining this campaign and they don't care.
What then? Only deleting thread by Admins can help. Why they don't do that? Because there is no proof of scam i guess..
I agree with the reasoning of the DT members who leave negative trust ratings for members who promote scam websites in their signatures. They also remove the ratings if the user/s stop promoting those websites and there should not be any reason except earning few bitcoins for wearing those signatures.
1. Promoting a website/company that's a fraud one is as good as being a part of their scam and agreeing with it.
2. The bitcoins one earns for promoting these websites is the money earned by scamming other users.
3. One is encouraging scams and by not participating in such campaigns, these campaigns would stop their scam on the forum.
4. Ponzi websites are 99% scam and they dont give the users the amount they have promised to give. If they manage to explain the DT member/s of how they promise to give the returns to the users, they wont be terms as scam then.
Also, it's high time the forum admins also try to stop the scamming on this forum. Though they have not implemented such rules, there is no need to let these KNOWN scam websites to operate on this forum. With the result, these scam websites would not be eligible to have campaigns here and users wont fall for their promotional benefits.
1. Promoting a website/company that's a fraud one is as good as being a part of their scam and agreeing with it.
2. The bitcoins one earns for promoting these websites is the money earned by scamming other users.
3. One is encouraging scams and by not participating in such campaigns, these campaigns would stop their scam on the forum.
4. Ponzi websites are 99% scam and they dont give the users the amount they have promised to give. If they manage to explain the DT member/s of how they promise to give the returns to the users, they wont be terms as scam then.
Also, it's high time the forum admins also try to stop the scamming on this forum. Though they have not implemented such rules, there is no need to let these KNOWN scam websites to operate on this forum. With the result, these scam websites would not be eligible to have campaigns here and users wont fall for their promotional benefits.
is it scamming?
until the second before they run ,it is a No.If they run with the coins, yes it is/was scam.But when you start playing blackjack or slot machine you know the risk. You can win or you can lose. When you lose it means that dealer or machine run with your money? In some way yes, but before you start this game you know the rules.
is it scamming?
until the second before they run ,it is a No.If they run with the coins, yes it is/was scam. Jump to: